Deal Size Matter in Real Estate?

Is deal size crucial in terms of experience quality in underwriting properties? I am assuming it is much more preferable looking at larger, sexier properties rather than class B - C properties in tertiary markets, but does it make a huge difference in terms of future opportunities in underwriting positions? If so, could someone explain why there may be a difference? More complex lease structures? Thanks in advance.

 
SuccessIsRevenge:
I believe other than maybe more complex lease structures, but is there anything else I am missing?
Personally, I agree with you, but you will want to emphasize the bigger and more complicated deals on your resume. The deals at the bottom end of the spectrum can sometimes get so pathetic and simplistic that an analyst is not even needed. If your experience is limited to assets that are owned and managed by a guy who sits on the porch with a shotgun whose financial reporting consists of receipts in a shoebox, then it might be hard to hit the ground running at Invesco acquiring $500m office towers.
 
prospie:

If your experience is limited to assets that are owned and managed by a guy who sits on the porch with a shotgun whose financial reporting consists of receipts in a shoebox

Hilarious! In all seriousness, I think the distinguishing factor is institutional (pension funds, endowments, hedge funds, banks, extremely high net worth individuals) vs. non institutional as opposed to deal size, asset class, product type, or location. The institutional players of the world allocate capital based on their risk aversion / fund type (core, core plus, value add, opportunistic).

You want to be a member of the institutional players club, not the club that receives their capital from a few family members, neighbors, and best friend.

 

I actually find that the smaller deals are the harder deals to underwrite (lack of good comparable information, poorer sponsors, etc.) and are much more likely to cause financial loss. I would just tweek your resume for the type of position you are applying for. If applying for a multifamily capital group then emphasize your multifamily work; if applying for a Class A developer then emphasize your larger, sexier deals.

 

I've done my fair share of underwriting of RE assets and my 2 cents would be that deal size does not matter in this case. My experience has been with properties ranging from $5 million to over $1 billion in a multitude of varieties in terms of number of leases/tenants, lease structures (NNN, Gross, Full service, etc.) and markets. There is a whole number of combinations of complexities at any given price. I wouldn't discount a "cheaper" property and call it less complex than a more expensive one. The differences in price would primarily be location and quality of the asset. It may sound sexier to work on a $1 billion deal b/c it likely gets a lot of attention, but doesn't make it any more difficult.

 
Best Response

I think "difficulty" is a subjective term. For example, if you're buying a fully-marketed property from a pension fund where the broker is providing detailed, categorized information in an online war room (e.g. lease abstracts, roof warranties, 10-year capex history) you really just go down your due diligence checklist. You have more boxes to check in this "institutional players club", but for the most part the Seller already did them and is just relaying the info. Not really that difficult, but yes it's a skill set other institutional buyers will look for in acquisitions.

Buying smaller properties from private owners is a whole other story. We're 25 days into DD with a private owner who did little maintenance on historic buildings for the last 10 years, with little documentation on what he did do. It's been a pain in the ass going through handwritten notes and then finding out you need $5MM for the elevators/roofs/HVAC. I would argue doing this regularly would make one "more valuable" primarily because you're not running on autopilot (or at least this is how I would spin it during an interview).

Fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds of run. - Kipling
 

Voluptatum consequatur ab facere asperiores quaerat doloremque. Numquam et rerum nihil dignissimos quidem enim voluptatum. Earum ducimus possimus suscipit veritatis nihil voluptatum labore. Ut hic aspernatur et culpa id amet quae.

Voluptatem ut ratione qui ipsam. Consequatur aspernatur laboriosam alias pariatur consequuntur qui. Quo quo quisquam eligendi ea consequatur voluptate aperiam.

Tempora error quia quidem eos aspernatur aperiam. Autem et nesciunt est molestiae eos. Qui omnis molestias consequatur dolorem sunt doloribus. Ut aspernatur et omnis et optio non non. Omnis non mollitia incidunt voluptas voluptatum labore. Maxime vel aspernatur accusamus.

Est dolore eaque quia. Est illum et aut sit perspiciatis. Saepe praesentium in cum. Hic omnis harum pariatur accusamus est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”