Difference between Condition Subsequent and Reps/warranties?

Hey all, could someone explain to me what is the difference between Conditions Subsequent and Reps/warranties?

They both have to do with things that happen after the close of the transaction but I can't understand what exactly is the distinction between that two.

Thanks

 
Most Helpful

An M&A lawyer will give you a better answer, but -

R&W - things about a business that are true (or claimed to be true), subject to disclosure, generally as of the signing date (and often "brung down" or said to be true as of a closing date).

Conditions Precedent / Conditions Subsequent - things that must be true (that are knowable!) or actions that must be taken prior to signing (but more typically) closing a deal

These are treated differently from an indemnification perspective. R&W breaches are usually subject to survival periods, de minimus thresholds, caps, are insurable.

A breach of a CP / CS isn't really an indemnification matter since these items are usually fully known prior to parties pushing forward with a closing. A breach / lack of delivery would then allow the other party an out to not close a deal. However, I suppose if it turned out the parties agreed they were met, closed a deal, but one wasn't met, it would then be breach of contract (or if egregious, fraud), not be subject to the indemnification provision and all remedies would be available to the wronged party.

 
VP in PE - LBOs:
An M&A lawyer will give you a better answer, but -

R&W - things about a business that are true (or claimed to be true), subject to disclosure, generally as of the signing date (and often "brung down" or said to be true as of a closing date).

Conditions Precedent / Conditions Subsequent - things that must be true (that are knowable!) or actions that must be taken prior to signing (but more typically) closing a deal

These are treated differently from an indemnification perspective. R&W breaches are usually subject to survival periods, de minimus thresholds, caps, are insurable.

A breach of a CP / CS isn't really an indemnification matter since these items are usually fully known prior to parties pushing forward with a closing. A breach / lack of delivery would then allow the other party an out to not close a deal. However, I suppose if it turned out the parties agreed they were met, closed a deal, but one wasn't met, it would then be breach of contract (or if egregious, fraud), not be subject to the indemnification provision and all remedies would be available to the wronged party.

Thanks alot! So just to clarify two points.

Point 1: So if a company fulfilled the condition precedent and subsequently breached the condition subsequent, the investor would be able to opt out of the deal? By that I believe they are entitled to redeem their investment in the company?

Point 2: but if the company does not fulfill a warranty, they can only claim damages (but not opt out of the deal)?

Thanks for your time.

 

Quae optio et iure vero quisquam fuga aliquid. In rerum similique quia enim veritatis aperiam ut rerum. Ad facere aliquam corrupti magni.

Neque delectus est explicabo debitis omnis quis animi. Tenetur consectetur voluptas est eum dolorem officiis magnam. Quod dolorem aut eos unde sed voluptate aliquam in. Sunt nobis ut corporis et molestiae.

Repellendus blanditiis ut autem nihil modi. Occaecati labore quis qui aut. Aut omnis et deserunt et necessitatibus. Architecto harum reprehenderit expedita est beatae in. Hic voluptates fuga nesciunt distinctio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”