Direct Method Cash Flow Statement

Okay, so I get confused on when to add or subtract.

Here's an example:

Balance Sheet
2012 2011
Inventory $ 2000 $ 1600
Accounts Payable $ 5800 $ 4000

Income Statement
COGS $13500

Cash Payments to Suppliers
= COGS + Increase in Inventory - Decrease in AP
= $13500 + $400 - $1800
= $12100

Both Inventory and AP increased from 2011 to 2012. So why is there a "+" for increase in inventory and "-" for decrease in AP?

Is there a Rule for when to add or subtract? I really appreciate it

Thanks Monkeys!

 
Febreeze:
It's a CASH flow statement: Increase in inventory = decrease in cash (if AP hasn't gone up) and decrease in AP = decrease in cash.

http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Preparing-the-Statement-Direct-M…

Thanks for your answer, but I am still finding this hard to understand. You mentioned that if Inventory increases, then there is a decrease in cash. So why is it in my example that when Inventory increased, there was no decrease in cash? Why doesn't the same logic apply here for Inventory?

No contract means I have all the power. They want me, but they can't have me. - Don Draper
 
ky0ung:
an increase(+) in an asset is a decrease(-) in cash. an increase in a liability(+) is an increase of cash(+). you can think about it like that and vice versa. in the cash payments to suppliers, shouldn't it be COGS - DECREASE in inventory - Decrease in AP? inventory goes from 2000 to 1600

I agree with you that instead of adding 400, we should be subtracting. I don't get it.

Based on this video, the matrix is clear to understand. And so I am still confused as to why Inventory does not follow this logic? I just don't get it.

No contract means I have all the power. They want me, but they can't have me. - Don Draper
 

Just to clarify further:

Think about it for a second.

You would add an increase in inventory as cash paid to suppliers because that means you bought more goods than you sold.

You would add subtract a decrease in accounts payable as cash paid to suppliers because that means you paid off some outstanding bills from previously unpaid purchases.

So just think about what the term you are adding/subtracting really means, and you will have your answer. No need for a rule.

 
Best Response
Cola Coca:
Just to clarify further:

Think about it for a second.

You would add an increase in inventory as cash paid to suppliers because that means you bought more goods than you sold.

You would add subtract a decrease in accounts payable as cash paid to suppliers because that means you paid off some outstanding bills from previously unpaid purchases.

So just think about what the term you are adding/subtracting really means, and you will have your answer. No need for a rule.

I'm trying to think logically, but I feel that the Rule is the best way for me to understand -If an Asset goes up, then cash decreases -If an Asset goes down, then cash increases -If a Liability goes up, then cash increases -If a Liability goes down, then cash decreases

I just can't figure this out, as to why Inventory is added? It should be subtracted based on this common rule.

No contract means I have all the power. They want me, but they can't have me. - Don Draper
 
analyst1609:
I'm trying to think logically, but I feel that the Rule is the best way for me to understand -If an Asset goes up, then cash decreases -If an Asset goes down, then cash increases -If a Liability goes up, then cash increases -If a Liability goes down, then cash decreases

I just can't figure this out, as to why Inventory is added? It should be subtracted based on this common rule.

Since you are trying to find "cash paid to suppliers", you are looking for cash decreases.

Inventory increased, so an asset went. By the rules, cash decreased. "Cash paid to suppliers" increased and was the reason your cash decreased.

EDIT: Made an error in my first post. You add a decrease in AP; that subtract shouldn't be there.

 

Laboriosam incidunt quibusdam nobis eius explicabo. Corporis molestiae quis corporis optio consequuntur iusto eos suscipit. Eaque quibusdam autem aut et. Nihil autem nobis eos atque tempore porro esse.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”