i do think this will be the trend going forward. it's the policy at other banks too...restricted cash and claw back. the actual cash paid out this year is going to have an extremely low ceiling. it is a very dangerous time for people who need a minimum bonus of x to cover their expenses.

unless you're really passionate about it, consider your options

 

there will be lawsuits unquestionably. don't look at them to succeed. the same way the courts looked the other way when bear shareholders tried to sue, they'll look the other way now. if it's viewed as for the good of the economy and necessary, courts can be surprisingly flexible.

good to hear you made it through the 10% massacre jimbo (assuming you're at MS)...i thought they'd shut down a lot of their prop groups, but apparently you're still kickin.

personally, i think that these clawbacks are a good thing. in some way, shape, or form, senior executives need to get the partnership mentality back into wall street firms, where the capital being risked is their capital. you think the goldman partners wouldve risked all their money on stuff they didnt understand back in the 80s because some trader said it was a good idea?

 
xqtrack:
there will be lawsuits unquestionably. don't look at them to succeed. the same way the courts looked the other way when bear shareholders tried to sue etc etc, they'll look the other way now. if it's viewed as for the good of the economy and necessary, courts can be surprisingly flexible.

good to hear you made it through the 10% massacre jimbo (assuming you're at MS)...i thought they'd shut down a lot of their prop groups, but apparently you're still kickin.

personally, i think that these clawbacks are a good thing. in some way, shape, or form, senior executives need to get the partnership mentality back into wall street firms, where the capital being risked is their capital. you think the goldman partners wouldve risked all their money on stuf they didnt understand back in the 80s because some junior guy said it was a good idea? didnt think so.

I couldn't agree more with that last part...It sucks for the indivual employee, but there's been such a huge disconnect between manager interest and shareholder interest...hopefully this will fix some of that.

 
Best Response
xqtrack:
there will be lawsuits unquestionably. don't look at them to succeed. the same way the courts looked the other way when bear shareholders tried to sue, they'll look the other way now. if it's viewed as for the good of the economy and necessary, courts can be surprisingly flexible.

good to hear you made it through the 10% massacre jimbo (assuming you're at MS)...i thought they'd shut down a lot of their prop groups, but apparently you're still kickin.

personally, i think that these clawbacks are a good thing. in some way, shape, or form, senior executives need to get the partnership mentality back into wall street firms, where the capital being risked is their capital. you think the goldman partners wouldve risked all their money on stuff they didnt understand back in the 80s because some trader said it was a good idea?

Remember the arbitration clause we all signed when we were hired? No lawsuits. Ultimately, though, I'd bet arbitration would work out for employees better anyway.

Look for these changes to become part of the employment contract, though, nullifying even arbitration.

 

"good to hear you made it through the 10% massacre jimbo (assuming you're at MS)...i thought they'd shut down a lot of their prop groups, but apparently you're still kickin. "

i am not at ms. this is the bonus style for most firms going forward as far as i am aware

 

Any suggested readings on the subject of what you call the "partnership mentality"? I was debating with one of my professors last week on this exact subject, she seems to think that protecting shareholders interest keeps execs conservative and personal capital investment by execs pushes firms to increase risk. Which clearly isn't the case, my argument was based on logic with no references for backup. Any suggestions?

 
HypeCycle:
Any suggested readings on the subject of what you call the "partnership mentality"? I was debating with one of my professors last week on this exact subject, she seems to think that protecting shareholders interest keeps execs conservative and personal capital investment by execs pushes firms to increase risk. Which clearly isn't the case, my argument was based on logic with no references for backup. Any suggestions?

i dunno. i posted a link a week ago in the ib forum from Michael Lewis where he is blaiming it on the end of the wall street partnership.

maybe your professor was talking about a study where if management owned more than 50% of the company, they historically under perform the market.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/sac-capital target=_blank>SAC</a></span>:
But..but...what else can we do that pays even close ?

What is it that you do that is so unique that you deserve to make that much money? What value added service are you providing that differentiates you and in turn your firm that you deserve to be paid so exhorbitantly high? What contribution to society did you make that merits such a compensation? What did you accomplish for the greater good of mankind?

Just trying to add a bit of color to the dialogue :-)

Alright... back to my dunkin donut coffee... had to switch from Starbucks... you know, tough economic times and all. The thing is it turns out I like dunkin donuts coffee better! Who woulda thunk it? I'm not such a snob after all!

 

it's all about short term risk for employees, and all about long term risk for employers...this is one of the very few solutions where you can link both present and future risks. a clawback linked to the general perf of stocks or company's end year results shoudlnt be that complicated to implement actually.

Pacio Break into finance - Learn the best tricks http://www.ibankee.com

Break into finance - Learn the best tricks http://www.ibankee.com
 

Has anyone else considered that the clawbacks will become a new profit center for firms?

They're basically going to set up a new department in each firm called "Blame Assignment". It will be this department's function to figure out who fucked up and punish them accordingly. My guess is, part of this department's bonus compensation will be based on the amount of money "clawed back", providing them with a huge incentive to look for ways to get their filthy dick-beaters on YOUR bonus money.

Paranoia? Perhaps. Just remember: people are never reliable, but money makes them predictable.

 

Assumenda sunt qui et aut aliquam quia. Eos officia vitae quam nesciunt eius. Occaecati dicta et et cumque. Accusantium quas omnis aspernatur sit nisi.

Provident quia rem voluptas nobis repudiandae mollitia. Accusantium provident accusamus occaecati repudiandae dolorum in.

Explicabo quo recusandae quam qui distinctio eius ea. Dicta quia nemo rerum est.

Veritatis quaerat fuga earum officia. Vel voluptas explicabo laboriosam beatae minima quia pariatur. Sed officiis dolor dolor tempore. Reiciendis beatae et non ut. Voluptatem sed cupiditate quas consequatur assumenda consequatur est corrupti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”