Do women only like rich men?

Article from Quartz: The stark differences in what men and women want from each other



Men want beautiful women, and women are drawn to rich men.
It’s a stereotype, to be sure—but one that’s been backed up again and again by scientific research. And these mating preferences might be more ingrained than we think: A new study, released this month and scheduled to be published in the January issue of Personality and Individual Differences journal, suggests our preferences for long-term partners are—by far—more consistent with gender than with any other attribute.

In a survey of nearly 28,000 straight men and women in the US aged 18 to 75, the study’s researchers (a team of social, behavioral, and health scientists from UCLA, Chapman University, Indiana University and Rutgers University) found what psychologists and matchmakers have long suspected

thoughts monkeys? I personally know of several couples where the man wasn't rich and the woman wasn't good looking - those couples seem to be doing okay.

Are men only drawn to attractive women, and women only to rich men? Are there exceptions?

 

This is why liberal arts majors are not in demand. Why did an entire team of "researchers" need to conduct an "analytical study" when they could've just put their rings together to summon Captain Obvious?

Dumb girls need someone to "make them laugh" and take care of them once their parents give up. Dumb guys need hot girls to show off to the world—the deeper their receding hairline, the taller and hotter the girl. Doy

 

Maybe it's denial? Does anybody really want to believe that money (for men) is critical to getting women? A materialistic, superficial truth can be hard to digest.

What do smart girls need?

 
plow:

Maybe it's denial? Does anybody really want to believe that money (for men) is critical to getting women? A materialistic, superficial truth can be hard to digest.

What do smart girls need?

short answer: Yes. e.g. Donald Trump ... 'nuff said ...

for the smart girls: money still is a desirable characteristic though maybe not the primary deciding factor ... all things equal you would go with the money ...

why is this such a revelation to you? not sure how old you are but the general experience of most men is that a rich kid or kid with "nice things" (including elevated social status) typically fares "better" than the average joe..

 
plow:

Maybe it's denial? Does anybody really want to believe that money (for men) is critical to getting women? A materialistic, superficial truth can be hard to digest.

What do smart girls need?

Smart girls need guys who aren't "inimidated" by their "success/drive/accomplishments/intelligence" (aka their belongs-under-a-bridge looks)

In all seriousness, though, smart girls do not know. As smart as they may be, they still want to date up too, just like all the other whores around them. But their wanting someone from an upper caste apparently translates to them being stuck up bitches with too-high standards?

A moron from Parsons will gladly take some Vandy grad because omg he works at a bank. Said moron wouldn't even even glance at some Fordham kid because she believes he doesn't deserve someone of her ilk (whatever that may be). And, surprise, surprise, no one says shit to her.

But a girl who went to Princeton and wants her next boyfriend recruitee to have come from a target? What a stuck up slore. People will tell her to lower her standards or stop being high maintenance. She'll hear shit like, "I know a great guy who graduated from Rutgers and is training to become a comedian" and "why won't you just give my [unemployed, dull, alcoholic] friend, Ryan, a chance?"

Tl;dr all girls want money. When girls who don't have any money of their own go after Daddy Warbucks, she is a digger of gold. And when a girl who has her own money goes after a boy who can make his own, she is a self-preserving snob. Throw in some acerbic wit and she quickly devolves into that unfeminine creature who will die alone and whose face will likely get eaten by her future brigade of cats. Fuck.

Anyway, what perplexes me is how smart guys put up with dumb girls with personalities on par with shoe horns. I didn't work this fucking hard to pair off with some non-target advertising exec, no matter how hot he may be, so I will never understand how you guys can do that.

 
Virginia Tech 4ever:

The key words: "long-term partners." Basically, if you're looking for a wife, your wealth/earnings potential is a material benefit to attracting a "hot" female. If you're looking to hook-up, it's largely immaterial.

Preach.

Fortes fortuna adiuvat.
 
plow:
I personally know of several couples where the man wasn't rich and the woman wasn't good looking - those couples seem to be doing okay.
Doesn't this kind of prove the point? I mean, if he was richer, his woman would probably be better looking.

Plus, "are men only drawn to attractive women?" Is this a joke? Playboy and other fap material is not exactly filled with plain looking, overweight women. This is hardly ground breaking material.

 

Good point, Dick. Then is the not-so-good-looking man (little wealth) and attractive woman an outlier?

Would you say fap material exists solely because men are drawn to attractive women but unable to get them?

 
Best Response

From a biological standpoint, for long term partners:

Women like men who are providers, protectors, enablers. This includes but is not limited to RICH men. This ensures that babies will not die off once they pop out, and will be taken care of

Men like women who are healthy, fertile, and youthful, so that the best quality babies can be produced. This includes but is not limited to HOT women. This ensures that the man's genes will have the best chance of survival

The one wrinkle is that BOTH men and women want a partner that they have good CHEMISTRY with, because a stronger pair bond will enhance both the QUALITY and SURVIVAL of the babies they produce through enhanced development, upbringing, and connection

These are the principles that are hardwired into the brain after centuries of evolution and operate on a subconscious level

 

Thanks for sharing about the chemistry aspect, never noticed it. Do you think we'll maintain the traditional man (provider) and woman (producer) hardwiring/nuclear family? It seems the push for gender equality might change this? Will the provider role always belong to the man?

 

But anyways. Yes, women want rich men and men want beautiful women. Men also want rich women and women also want handsome men. There's a ton of factors that determine whether someone gets boosted or dropped in terms of suitability, most of which are personal.

Edit: What I'm saying here, which was not at all clear, is that a survey can't capture the give and take of how it happens in the real world. So, while on a survey you make pick the richest dude or hottest girl, when real life happens and there are real problems associated with that, your answer may differ drastically.

 

Ipsum quaerat consequatur voluptas corrupti aperiam sunt dignissimos. Suscipit vero natus sit. Ab vero dolorum voluptas dolorum et aut iste.

Odio nulla quae in sit consequatur tempore esse velit. Voluptatum autem iure enim blanditiis delectus tempora. Inventore et expedita voluptatem esse doloribus. Sint ullam et dolores ullam at ut. Aut qui quam eum.

Officiis numquam voluptate dolor magni laborum non. Consequatur magnam quisquam natus hic. Blanditiis quasi cum architecto et. Numquam veniam vel repudiandae quidem est aut. Voluptatem aut eum aut earum eum molestias. Iste est maiores consequuntur in exercitationem qui quas pariatur. Error rerum et unde itaque veniam.

Deleniti omnis earum omnis aliquid assumenda asperiores. Ea quibusdam nostrum quos quia et quae. Ad dolores ut amet illo incidunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”