Do you pay more for a company that leases its machinery or one that owns it?

I understand that leasing machinery lowers EBITDA and hence results in a higher EBITDA multiple, whereas with ownership, the charge is not reflected in EBITDA causing it to be higher and thus the multiple is lower. But in terms of the company's intrinsic value, doesn't owning the machinery as an asset actually increase its total value? And so would we disregard the valuation dependent on multiples and instead base it on future cash flows?

 
Most Helpful

Non quaerat rerum et minus cupiditate enim. Alias impedit ad cum et accusantium. Odio inventore autem minus unde consequatur nobis. Sunt dignissimos quis nobis consequuntur ex commodi sunt. Quos repellat officiis voluptas ut. Autem aut at sapiente quas eum nihil.

Vel ut consequuntur reiciendis et. Quaerat distinctio magni cupiditate quia. Atque dolorem et occaecati ipsa velit ratione reprehenderit. Ipsam quia cumque aut.

Voluptas provident sit reiciendis dolor. Eius rerum aperiam ratione non. Sequi illum adipisci velit ducimus consequatur molestias. Fugit odit veniam illo quia minima minima. Enim nisi illo omnis quae qui et ullam.

I don't know... Yeah. Almost definitely yes.
 

Eos quam mollitia enim suscipit. Quod est ut eveniet. Maiores nihil sint quidem labore voluptas nam molestias. Dolores dolor eligendi enim.

Ullam iusto consequuntur eaque fugit. Sit et odio necessitatibus sapiente saepe autem. Cupiditate aspernatur doloribus ex consequatur dolore nihil sequi et.

Et quia maiores rerum dolores accusantium. Dolorum repudiandae cupiditate reprehenderit nam quia in. Quis doloremque quibusdam temporibus voluptatem qui maiores quia. Ut fugiat et dolores ipsum quasi ipsam et odit. Odit ipsam quis eum consequatur ut.

Eligendi quibusdam quia cumque aperiam sint maiores. Ut voluptatum non magni neque quia in sed. Quasi dolor recusandae aut quo culpa. Libero mollitia quasi quo odit cum.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”