Does interest rate vol impact bond prices?

Was thinking about this the other day and haven't been able to come to an answer. If there are any rate traders on here would love to hear your perspective:

If I owned a vanilla bond that had natural convexity to interest rates, it feels like I would almost want high IR vol, as I would have the opportunity to "delta" hedge duration risk and capture the gamma over time.

Obviously, there is no ir vol input into classic PV bond prices. So how is this dynamic considered in the pricing?

 

yes, vol comes into play with MBS pricing because of prepayment models...but vol is not a pricing component for standard fixed rate or floating rate bonds such as US Treasuries or corporate bonds...unless the bond has an embedded option (semi-common for high yield bonds) which then requires you to price the value of the option to get a total price for the bond

 

You're like, technically, correct, but 'pricing a treasury' is a silly/rote exercise. Really pricing a treasury, practically speaking, means something more like 'where do you think this par rate should be' or 'how do we want to trade these tenors' and some of the models you use to answer those more substantive questions will 100% include a vol component.

 

I think generally pricing for a given asset class is around the simplest realistic/reasonable model of expected cash flows where you are not missing anything critical (ex: you need to account for prepayment for mortgages, and volatility for options rather than just current payoff).

Convexity is beneficial (regardless of whether or not you are delta hedging), but to quantify this you'd need some assumption about realized volatility etc. and I don't think it has enough of an impact to matter that much for most bonds (of shorter tenor).

 
Most Helpful

Short answer - yes!

Longer answer - In simple English, positive convexity is beneficial to you, so you pay for it (by accepting a lower yield). Negative convexity is harmful to you, so you get paid for it (by receiving a higher yield). This is why, say, Agencies will trade at a spread above the comparable tenor UST, and why the magnitude of that spread will be a function of rate vol. You can imagine that if the curve becomes 'fixed' overnight, the benefits of convexity disappear (you hug that yield spread on your agencies tight), whereas at the other extreme if the curve starts realizing some silly high level of vol, that +ve convexity mints you pnl, while that -ve convexity would be bleeding you out.

Anti Ilmanen's classic series on the curve provides a gentle introduction to a more formal treatment, starting with 'convexity bias' in the long-end (i.e. why the curve is humped and not linearly increasing) if you want more.

 

Consequuntur impedit nesciunt eos consequatur nisi id quae. Occaecati harum exercitationem aut exercitationem rerum est et. Qui laudantium beatae et exercitationem consequatur accusantium eveniet. Aliquid exercitationem ea doloribus minima non. Tempora vero sed beatae qui officia.

Rerum a voluptate molestias neque eius voluptate. Autem qui commodi consequatur laborum quis. Aut eum quia aspernatur libero non.

Sit omnis tempore suscipit. Autem accusantium ut minus qui non numquam. Illum laudantium dolore et. Ipsam suscipit nisi deserunt accusantium. Ut aspernatur omnis quaerat ea exercitationem vero earum id. Dolor nobis occaecati omnis excepturi velit molestiae non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”