Does pre LBO debt matter when screening for potential LBO candidates

Hi,

I am about to write my master thesis from a PE firm perspective and I am looking for potential LBO candidates.

I have come across many threads where it is stated that one of the desirable characteristics of a LBO candidate is a low pre-debt levels. I need to find some good sources that could shed some light on this matter. I hope you have some good books or articles that I can use.

I am basically trying to figure out if this does matter and if so how high debt levels should be acceptable. D/E ratio of 10%? 30% etc.

Thanks

 

Leverage is usually considered from a EBITDA and FCF perspective (ie measure of ability to deleverage) rather than D/E.

When I look at equity's share of purchase price funding, it's more as a sign of how much the PE firm stands to lose, hence had incentives to do a good deal. Also, equity share is partly a function of how much debt the business can bear, which takes you back to my first point.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

Pre-LBO debt matters if there is a ton of it, there are heavy call protections, and you can't refinance it in the current market. I don't think there's a set percentage or number for acceptable pre-LBO debt levels -- this depends on the company and the market. For example, you can't LBO First Data today with with $21bn of debt, but you can LBO Air Medical and boost leverage from 5x to 7x (which KKR just did).

 
Best Response

Hey,

in my understanding the debt level itself does not matter as most sponsors refinance the existing debt and put their own financing on the company anyway, thereby making the pre-acquisition financing structure irrelevant. This refinancing is regularly not a choice the sponsor can make on his own, but is more a result of CoC (change of control) clauses of the credit facilities' contracts.

You could argue that extremely high leverage also increases the early repayment fees the sponsor has to pay in case of a transaction.

In my opinion, however, you could also argue that a company with historically higher (!) debt levels can be more attractive as a LBO-candidate

(i) The company is known to the leveraged finance community, i.e. it can be easier and cheaper to secure external financing (likelihood of existing financing parties to engage in new transaction is pretty high as well) (ii) The company/management is used to and capable of managing the company with high debt levels (iii) In order to serve the high debt levels pre-acquisitions, a higher levered company is more likely to show strong, consistent cash flows, a highly desirable characteristic of LBO-candidates (iv) ...

Just to give the discussion a slightly different school of thought ;)

 

Aside from the potential breakage fees (which should rarely, if ever, be enough to turn away from a deal), pre-LBO debt is irrelevant when screening for potential targets - remember, you as a PE firm are buying the net assets of a company (i.e., the equity, which is equal to assets less liabilities including any debt) - if there is a lot of pre-LBO debt which can't be refinanced (rarely true) or you don't want to refinance it (you rarely have a choice due to CoC provisions), the purchase price will be smaller (since the proportion of liabilities to assets will be higher). If you buy a company on a cash free/debt free basis (most common), the purchase price will be higher (since the proportion of liabilities to assets will be lower). Either way, theoretically, you should end up with the same post-LBO "enterprise value" and amount of leverage in both cases (unless the pre-LBO debt can't be refinanced for some odd reason and covenants prohibit you from adding more leverage... but I have never seen such as scenario).

It's much more useful to look at the required purchase price of the net assets and how much equity vs. debt you can use to finance that (if there is existing debt that can't be refinanced for some odd reason, you won't have to "pay" for that anyway - it just rolls over).

Does that make sense?

 

I would say the pre-LBO cap structure is irrelevant, as is the D/E ratio. Its probably silly to think that the pre-LBO cap structure is a statistically significant driver of post-LBO EBITDA & FCF generation.

There are certainly some fringe benefits that ILikeDistressed outlined, but to think it is a material driver is completely flawed.

The point that was made about having too much leverage making buyouts difficult also has merit. If the call premiums on pre-existing debt is too high, then it simply becomes more expensive to buy a company. This wont be reflected by a D/E ratio, however. You will have to read individual indentures to tease this info out.

Array
 

The amount of leverage a company has historically taken on can be a sign of other things.

For example, if a firm has been significantly over-equitized further investigation could show that it's a business that has large swings in cash flow due to the nature of the business, so they keep it deleveraged with a cash pile to deal with that (completed contract project based businesses, for example).

Didn't we just talk about this a couple weeks ago?

 
Khayembii:
Didn't we just talk about this a couple weeks ago?

Yes, although it may have been a few months. @87aronkjart - do some digging through old threads in this PE subforum and you'll find more discussion on this point.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

Thanks for the comment guys. Big help! I will look more thoroughly through older posts next time before posting.

I have to admit I do agree with most of your points that pre-LBO debt should not matter in most cases. That is why I thought it was a bit puzzling that I was reading many comments and posts online where most of them stated that "a desirable characteristic of a LBO target is low or no initial debt".

If you do know any good books or academical papers which address this please let me know since I have not found any rock solid sources so far. Can´t really use this forum as a source at such a high academic level :P

Cheers

 

Take a look at Levered Financial Markets by Maxwell and Shenkman. A lot of that book is about process, terms etc and not directly on the points you're looking for, but it should help get you up to speed on the industry and jargon and it does, to some extent, touch on the stuff you're looking at.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

Sunt laboriosam et dolor quis nemo officia voluptatem. Qui earum non eos et autem. Deserunt aspernatur suscipit suscipit impedit aut consectetur quidem. Unde libero sunt nobis consequatur sapiente quo. Pariatur et similique ullam consequatur architecto et. Aut maxime non officia reprehenderit et autem. Deleniti pariatur nihil fugiat rerum sint est.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”