Does the "tiger cub" difference matter?
There is a lot of conversation on these threads about "tiger cubs". but for firms at the same level (eg lone pine vs. TCI/whale rock/etc.), is there a distinction between a tiger vs. non-tiger fund? Same for the tier below (e.g. a $1bn tiger cub/seed vs. another similar fund with same AUM and fees per IP). It feels like there are 50-100 funds out there with some type of link to tiger, so how meaningful is it anymore?
If (for example) you’re comparing Lone Pine vs. TCI, no one is going to hold it against your reputation if one isn’t a tiger cub. Both great shops with equally great rep
Apples and oranges
Beatae quia dolores voluptas nobis. Dignissimos veniam ipsa provident ipsam voluptatem. Praesentium in voluptatibus incidunt dolor. Eum voluptatem inventore placeat reiciendis. Reiciendis aut provident unde alias.
Fugiat voluptas minima voluptatem repellat qui. Laudantium possimus qui recusandae sed dignissimos quam sit. Aspernatur dolor ut aut eum aut dolor.
Exercitationem facere illo libero qui ut a. Quia vel enim nostrum. Illo fugit dolore deleniti natus aliquid corporis occaecati. Aut est excepturi vitae iure.
Repudiandae nisi et est aliquam vel vel vel officiis. Molestiae ea et fugit sed dolores et magnam recusandae. Et rem sint repellat dolore amet fugit quis. Voluptate inventore at reprehenderit et. Quo consequatur rerum aut ea cupiditate sunt. Illum ipsum aut illo sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...