DRW vs. BB S&T

I'm interested in hearing people's perceived difference between FT positions as a trader at DRW (or similar places like maybe SIG) and BB S&T.

My perception on some of the differences
1) People outside of the industry won't know about DRW
2) More money at DRW if you are good (how much though? 1 year out / 5 years out?)
3) Better hours at DRW
4) Chicago vs. NYC

Would appreciate any input, thanks.

 

If you give a shit about people knowing about where you work, the majority of props aren't for you, because NOBODY will know anything about your firm. Outside of maybe Citadel, you can expect 0 people to know any prop firm at all--that is just how it goes. In fact, you will probably hear crap from people back home, who know nothing, asking you about why you didn't work at Merrill like Johnny Gofuckshimself from HS who is doing PWM at the local branch. A friend of mine from work left an engineering gig at a F500 gig to work for a prop. He makes way more money than he ever did in engineering and, more importantly, enjoys his work and lifestyle more. He still hears to this day from people back home about how 'dumb' it was career wise to leave such an 'amazing' position.

How much difference in compensation? Besides the fact that you're most likely in Chicago versus NYC (massive cost of living difference), some top props pay better salaries on top of the substantially bigger bonus Potential. You get paid a % of your PnL and you'll trade earlier at a prop firm... possibly with greater risk as well. There is no hard and fast number as it depends a lot on you.

Hours are no comparison. I don't know of any bank desk that has better hours than any prop. The only problem being that you may have to do overnight at some prop firms.

Chicago vs NYC--your world. A good buddy of mine does IBD for GS in NYC and he would be the first to tell you that both offer a lot and that there are pluses and minuses to both and anybody with a hardon for one of the other probably doesn't know what they are talking about. For me personally I will say that the money you will make will go a hell of a lot further in Chicago and it offers most of the same benefits of any major city. It isn't and will never be NYC though.

 
new_era:
massive cost of living difference between chicago and nyc? WRONG

You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about - son. He's not at all wrong- the difference in cost of living between NYC/Chicago is, without question, undeniably, MASSIVE.

 
International Pymp:
new_era:
massive cost of living difference between chicago and nyc? WRONG

You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about - son. He's not at all wrong- the difference in cost of living between NYC/Chicago is, without question, undeniably, MASSIVE.

NYC is MUCH more expensive than Chicago. First, the rent in NYC is just outrageous. Here in Chicago, you can get a really nice 1-bedroom in a luxury highrise for like $1600/month; that same place in NYC would easily be $3000/month. Then you have higher costs for almost everything plus the 4% NYC city tax. Making $50K in Chicago is equivalent to making $100K in manhattan.

 

lulz.... go look at the price of any comparable apartments in Manhattan to pretty much any spot you want in the city of Chicago. You're going to pay half as much for a nicer place in Chicago. And if you're going out to bars/clubs/restaurants for at least part of your entertainment, you can do the same math there.

 

yeah I think it's obvious that chicago is a lot cheaper than new york, we don't really need to debate that. more questions: what's the firing rate like at DRW? do HFs want to take people who were successful traders there and are there any other exit opps? I know everyone says if you do well at DRW you don't need exit opps but I'm curious anyway.

 

Firing rate? There is high turnover at all trading firms.... for all sorts of reasons. Some more than others,. I don't think DRW fires more than any others.

If you're worried about exit opps, look elsewhere or do a search. Seriously, dumb questions that you didn't spend any time researching, obviously.

 

Chill jerome. I don't know what to make of your last sentence, and I disclaimed the exit opps question more or less trying to indicate that I understand what you're saying I don't understand, apparently I did a bad job

 
T3h:
Chill jerome. I don't know what to make of your last sentence, and I disclaimed the exit opps question more or less trying to indicate that I understand what you're saying I don't understand, apparently I did a bad job
I am quite chill--just letting you know that you are asking questions that you know are stupid. What I'm saying is that you didn't bother to research the question to begin with and the fact that you 'know' these thing, yet still ask the question indicates a degree of ignorance. A lot of the questions you have are about prestige (people knowing about the firm) and exit opps and I'm being honest with you that if those are big concerns for you that a lot of these firms are not for you because there is little prestige in the sense that people outside of trading are unlikely to have ever heard of any of these firms and the exit opps include.... other trading jobs (it is a fairly specialized skill set and experience). If you bothered to take a minute to search, there are plenty of people that move in between hedge funds and props, but if that is your concern, again, you probably aren't going to be happy with it because the exit opps are going to be limited in scale by the nature of the job.
 

And while you can earn more at most props, there is quite a bit more 'stability' in having a job at a bank with a very solid paycheck, you have the name brand recognition outside of trading circles (perhaps if your goal is b-school), and it is a more obvious 'path' for some. Going by your posts, that might be better for you because you will likely have more options after your analyst stint than after a few years of trading at most props--if only because people outside of trading will have heard of your bank and may give you a shot doing something else.

 

thanks, those are much more helpful. i think you're probably right, the fact that I'm asking these questions may be the answer to my questions and banking might be a better route because of its long term flexibility/stability

 
trader 8:
thisdude:
take DRW Trading. Same money starting out, more potential, much lower cost of living / taxes. DRW is great and well respected - who knows you could move up to Jane Street with that on your resume.

not everyone would agree with you that Jane Street is better.

lol FAIL

I'm not claiming to be an expert or anything. But most people seem to put GETCO/JSC above DRW. DRW/Optiver/IMC/Jump are all great shops.

 

I would say DRW is a better place to start off. As long as you remain within the Capital Markets world, vast majority of people will know of DRW and its prestige. Who cares if the average joe on the street has ever heard of you company or not. I am pretty sure there are tons of top 50 of F500 companies that you have never heard off. 2 years sown the road you will see that DRW would have been the better choice. I chose a BB over D.E. Shaw two years ago, not in S&T and I regretted it.

 

It doesn't depend on us. It depends what YOUR ultimate future goal is? We can't make that decision for you.

DRW- Prop trading Citi S&T - Flow Trading

Not sure which desk you are placed in, which would matter as well in where it will take you in the future. So why don't you tell us what you want to do. Chicago vs. NYC should be your least of worries.

 
juked07:
jayhawk83:
not even close. take the NYC BB. heard half the analyst class quits by the end of their first year. a lot of unhappy jr ppl.

This sounds very different than most experiences I have heard about. Can you substantiate that at all?

this also sounds totally off to me. i was there just this weekend and everyone seemed much happier than at banks and they were, like, real people. also they told me a retention rate much higher than 50%...

 
jayhawk83:
not even close. take the NYC BB. heard half the analyst class quits by the end of their first year. a lot of unhappy jr ppl.
Where the heck are you getting that information from prospective monkey?? A lot more people are happier at these prop shops then the BBs. Your chances of being axed at a BB is way much faster then a prop. I have worked at both BB and boutiques I can tell you.
 

DRW seems like it would have a similar retention rate because it pays first year analysts the same as BBs and does a year of education so you'd think they are more invested in their trader assistants than possibly other props. any more comments would be much appreciated, what would y'all do between DRW and mid tier BB?

 

DRW DOES have a good retention rate among TAs and does a great job training them (that is one of the things they are known for). And people here think BBs have good retention rates? Hmm.... people primarily go to BBs (even in S&T) with the intention of leaving within 2-3 years. Considering there are some props with training programs of over a year, I would think that retention is the last thing you're worrying about. If you blow a lot of money once you are trading, you are probably more likely to get axed quickly at a prop though.

If you are sure want to trade, go to DRW. If you want to do something else or aren't sure about trading, then don't go to DRW. You'll most likely make more money there (on top of cheaper cost of living) and have a better environment, but those aren't everyone's primary reasons for choosing a place of employment.

 

I don't think your point 2 (more money at DRW) is necessarily accurate. I think that is true in the short run (while you are an analyst/associate at the BB), but in the long run I'm sure that an MD at a BB makes more than nearly anyone at DRW.

 
Best Response
anontrader:
I don't think your point 2 (more money at DRW) is necessarily accurate. I think that is true in the short run (while you are an analyst/associate at the BB), but in the long run I'm sure that an MD at a BB makes more than nearly anyone at DRW.

Are you sure you're "sure"? Sounds like you're just speculating. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if MDs at BBs do make more than 90% of DRW, as you've suggested. But I also wouldn't be surprised if the top earners at DRW are way ahead of BB MDs. Certainly the partners (who are already ~2-3% of DRW) are probably doing better than a typical MD.

 
juked07:
anontrader:
I don't think your point 2 (more money at DRW) is necessarily accurate. I think that is true in the short run (while you are an analyst/associate at the BB), but in the long run I'm sure that an MD at a BB makes more than nearly anyone at DRW.

Are you sure you're "sure"? Sounds like you're just speculating. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if MDs at BBs do make more than 90% of DRW, as you've suggested. But I also wouldn't be surprised if the top earners at DRW are way ahead of BB MDs. Certainly the partners (who are already ~2-3% of DRW) are probably doing better than a typical MD.

I don't think that's a fair comparison. Sure, the partners probably do make more, but that's like saying a BB's shareholders make a lot of money. True, but not relevant to working there. You aren't going to ever become a partner at DRW, that is for the few guys who started the firm. I have spoken to people both at a top BB and a top prop shop, and I think people largely agree that an MD is doing better than nearly anyone even at top prop shops, but the junior folks are doing better at the prop shops.

 

DRW is a top trading firm in chicago..they trade huge volumes on the ED. If you do have an offer from them I would def. take it compared to working at a BB. If you bust your ass at DRW and make some heads turn you will have a nice and stable career there.

 

The only real difference you will notice in the prop firms is your degree of freedom to an extent and the financial capabilities of the firm. The firm itself will have very little impact on how you preform. It has been said before it doesnt really matter where you trade, if you are a stud you will get noticed.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

If you really want to do fixed income futures, DRW is one of the best places to receive training and work at. BB S&T would probably give you exposure to a wider variety of products, and it's probably better for networking as well. A junior trader would have a much higher quality of life at DRW, since their first-year base is around $75k and you're living in Chicago.

 

I would be more inclined to do DRW, but then again I'd rather trade than be a Quant.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Interesting, if thats the case it sounds like a pretty good deal.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Citi in their Quantitative Analysis and Trading Program is a very elite group of people. If you succeed and get into their full time program, you'll be earning a lot at citi. Also, everyone in pretty much all industries know what citi is. DRW is a great company, but there are lots of interviewers from BBs that have not heard of it before.

 

In reference to a couple of the posts above, I don't think the traders at DRW are looking for exit opportunities, so that isn't really relevant for them. People on this forum have observed (correctly) that good traders from banks can go on to join prop trading firms. It is assumed the reverse is not true, that is, one would be hard pressed to go from a prop trading firm to a bank. I think the missing piece is that people at prop trading firms are not going to want to go work at banks, because if they are good they can make more money where they are. As a result, I dont think any of the traders at DRW care whether BB recruiters know what the firm is (this was mentioned in a post above).

 

I don't think the risk averse person would choose either of these options, you're confusing relatives with absolutes.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Depends on what you want. If you want the resume builder then go with Citi but if you want a more relaxed atmosphere with a lot of upside go with DRW. I've worked/traded with both and they're pretty far apart culturally. I'd be more inclined to go with DRW b/c you'll get a lot of hands on training without all the BB bullcrap. Not too mention your dollar will go alot further in Chicago. (Don't underestimate that, especially when your NYC taxes come due. This place ain't cheap.)

Little pigs get fed, fat pigs get slaughtered
 

Autem rerum quam nemo dignissimos quam. Aut dolore quis voluptatum suscipit maxime velit.

Quasi eligendi est laborum optio omnis. Non voluptas sed dolorem quasi. Repudiandae omnis rerum dolor asperiores modi. Perspiciatis qui enim neque ut.

 

Ratione consequatur molestiae dolorum sunt placeat et. Voluptatum minus at magnam. Corrupti provident quidem ut tenetur sit sint sint. Autem quia dolorem qui mollitia et eos corrupti. Corporis est minima quo quos consequatur.

Sapiente atque sint blanditiis totam iste rerum nobis. Sit et asperiores architecto doloremque quia perferendis modi voluptas. Modi et sint quidem consequatur eum.

Asperiores sint exercitationem id tempore qui. Quos voluptas recusandae dolorem eligendi ut sunt vitae. Veritatis excepturi quia praesentium quae. Commodi culpa non iusto. Dolorum at repellendus doloremque aliquam aspernatur enim. Sit est fugit tempore temporibus facere provident sint. Odit quidem nesciunt voluptas qui quos vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”