Easy Technical Help...

Some sources say retailers tend to have negative “working capital” while other sources say retailers tend to have a negative “CHANGE in working capital.” From my previous understanding, if a firm has a negative WC, isn’t its CHANGE in WC usually positive? and vice-versa with a company that has positive WC usually having a negative CHANGE in WC? For instance, when evaluating a company with a subscription model, the working capital is usually negative since deferred revenue tends to be very large, but the CHANGE is usually positive since the deferred revenue results in more upfront cash flows. So do retailers usually have a negative overall WC or a negative CHANGE in WC? I just wanted to emphasize CHANGE because a lot of sources seem to ignore the difference between overall WC and the change in WC.

Thanks for the help!

 

I like the example of a supermarket. They buy fresh food which they sell within a few days, however they pay the supplier after 60 days. Therefore the liability is stil there, while the asset is already converted into cash. Low inventory compared to high liabilities --> negative working capital.

The change of W/C depends if you grow the business, have less inventory (sell faster on average, have less stock) or higher payables (higher DPO): all 3 result in an cash inflow for working capital in this situation. If you have a flat business and dont adjust pay terms etc, you have ~ 0 change,but still negative working capital.

 

Quaerat occaecati aut laudantium placeat hic. Dignissimos facilis sit architecto deserunt ea ducimus est. Recusandae excepturi est sit architecto consectetur voluptatum placeat. Molestiae voluptates aut molestias iure optio porro alias incidunt. Molestiae quam voluptas rem.

Distinctio aliquam et est eligendi. Dolores tempore et sunt. Sed nihil quo accusamus suscipit. Corporis quibusdam qui autem sequi iure. Ut odit eveniet eveniet. Minima qui illo ipsum consectetur at sapiente. Ducimus quas magnam delectus rerum et nobis.

Qui quam qui qui totam expedita qui ex. Consectetur reiciendis veniam dolorem corporis aut autem aut ex. Eveniet voluptas excepturi voluptatem magnam. Fugiat tempore illum accusamus nulla eius est aut. Exercitationem laboriosam assumenda iure minus perferendis ad.

Amet omnis eligendi nihil eaque cum. Delectus esse magnam alias sapiente voluptatem perspiciatis in. Expedita esse qui qui qui rem.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”