Trending Content
+138 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 33 | 3s | |
+73 | Best IB group on the Street | 35 | 6h | |
+66 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 1d | |
+58 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 1d | |
+49 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 23 | 18h | |
+38 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 2d | |
+35 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 3d | |
+34 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 13 | 9h | |
+26 | Very ridiculous interview feedback | 13 | 8h | |
+26 | Got RBC offer but I have cold feet accepting. | 34 | 11h |
Career Resources
Moelis LA/NY > Moelis SF
.
finally. an original post!
finally. an original comment!
Deleted
Deleted
deleted
Deleted
Bump. Curious as well. Thinking of lateraling.
All these groups are pretty weak..compared to rbc NY and db jacksonville
Worked at a BB in SF before lateraling to NY. Lazard: Laz RX is stronger than M&A, and RX is run all out of NY. NY's pretty sweaty, since some of the senior folks might still be stuck in the old-school Laz culture. SF does healthcare and tech. Tech has good connections with Google, but I heard from some buddies that they were disappointed from the lack of M&A work, as they do mostly consulting work for clients they have on retainer. Believe it's non-transaction ongoing advisory. HC did the Amgen/Onyx deal a few years back, which was huge. HC has good dealflow, though they cover specific repeat clients (Gilead).
Moelis: LA>NY>SF. LA is Moelis's strongest office, given its renowned rep on the street for exits and prestige. Of the SF/LA shops you mentioned, Moelis LA is the only one where you'll be able to get to NY for buyside later, if that's a concern. NY does most of the RX work and have been advisors on some big RX clients, but still sweaty. SF does tech. Most of the senior people in SF are BB rainmakers who brought their clients over. Heard SF has good culture, nothing like the sweatshops NY or LA are made out to be. Heard some wild things from my friends at Moelis on the WC though, like paid trips to Vegas and that they take the LA interns to play poker with the team at Ken Moelis's house.
CVP: CVP has 2 notable offices in California (SF, which does HC, and PA, which does tech). Had a buddy in one of the WC offices transfer to CVP NY after a few years, which is a good move. SF HC is huge in the biotech space (tons of public co sell sides) but is non-existent in other areas like devices and services. HC did Gilead/Kite and CVS/Aetna, so you can imagine that they're big players. One of the partners in SF used to be pretty senior at BAML. Since CVP prides itself on advisory, you'll get some consulting / operational strategy experience.
From a prestige standpoint, I'd argue the NY offices are much stronger than the SF ones. Since you're asking in terms of exits/prestige, would say CVP NY/Moelis LA/Laz RX NY will get you similar looks and are top on the street, though if you're looking specifically for buyout exits, Moelis LA is the strongest if you don't like CVP's three-year's commitment (not a concern imo, but lots of people here seem to hate it) or the fact that Laz RX will have more distressed buyside exits. All three are top tier EBs and would ake them over GS/MS anyday imo. Moelis NY is a tier below, then Laz SF/CVP SF/Moelis SF. I'd say the SF shops will make it hard to lateral to NY for PE/HF later on, and traditionally analyst exits have geared less towards buyout PE and more towards VC or growth, which makes sense given the Valley. This was a large part of the reason why I moved over to NY. The SF shops are also overshadowed by other big names like GS TMT or Q in SF tech banking, whereas everyone knows Moelis LA is the top shop in LA or CVP is one of the biggest M&A players in NY.
at a SF shop and would say this is spot on
Thank you for the really helpful insight, SB'd
Where would Evercore stack up in this? I know they have an office in Menlo Park that does Tech and Healthcare.
For tech, EVR is probably the best EB in SF (excluding Qatalyst). They just led the Grubhub deal a few weeks back and exits are strong. Laz is comparable but also a different model (consulting vs tech M&A).
Voluptates quidem repellat tempora temporibus doloribus. Aliquid earum voluptatibus itaque sunt distinctio et. Repellendus non nemo error non optio sapiente quis. Tenetur quia ex optio corrupti nulla ea.
Similique et iste nisi. Accusamus deserunt ex quam enim.
Molestiae ducimus reprehenderit expedita nam soluta et. Totam dicta et rerum distinctio officia accusantium aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...