Effect of celebrities?

Was just scrolling through twitter when an article about Rihanna causing a $800mil slide on snap's stock popped up. Turns out an ad on snapchat took the piss out of her domestic abuse case and in turn she told people to delete snap. Kylie Jenner apparently also sent a tweet before dissing snap, eventually causing $1bil lost in snap's market cap.

How much of an effect do celebrities or "opinion leaders" actually have on the stock market?

Imagine getting a whole bunch of celebrities to tweet shit about a company, wonder how that's gonna turn out hmmm..

 

Based off that example, I would say a lot.

Celebrities are great "influcencers" (sic), mainly because people are feel they identify with them based on one or two aspects of their life. That's why they are used for advertising, or voice overs in movies where you can't even tell its the person. Think about all the stuff people won't buy or watch if it was the exact same show or product without the person. Would "The Voice" work with random producers?

Case in point, remember the Shark Tank episode where the guy was trying to sell the rubber band or hold your money, but called it the broccoli band or something. Catch was, the presenter had one of the Sopranos guy as the spokesman. Barbara bought into it, solely on changing the name to the Vinny Wad.

 
Best Response
Jusmonkey:
Was just scrolling through twitter when an article about Rihanna causing a $800mil slide on snap's stock popped up. Turns out an ad on snapchat took the piss out of her domestic abuse case and in turn she told people to delete snap. Kylie Jenner apparently also sent a tweet before dissing snap, eventually causing $1bil lost in snap's market cap.

How much of an effect do celebrities or "opinion leaders" actually have on the stock market?

Imagine getting a whole bunch of celebrities to tweet shit about a company, wonder how that's gonna turn out hmmm..

I think you have to keep the context in mind here. If Kylie Jenner says she's never driving a Ford again, I don't think $F moves at all. Snapchat, however, is a social app. That's all it is. You follow your friends, and if you care about these things, celebrities. So if a celebrity quits an app or talks poorly about a business where they have an outsized impact on that business's success, it has an actual impact on stock price.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Has relatively little to do with it in my opinion. Rihanna saying Snap sucks, is the equivalent of Buffet saying the balance sheet of company X sucks. The average age of an investor is higher, yet the impact of Buffet will probably be much higher. Pretty interesting for an audience which is supposed to be more intelligent, independent, mature and rational than the average snapchat user.

 

You guys are too naive. It's more likely than not that a (huge) short seller paid Jenner to post negatively about $SNAP. They profited massively, and kicked some back to her through the use of 3rd party accounts / moles.

Learn to be slightly more cynical. You'd see the truth more often.

 

Just making sure: this sort of market manipulation is illegal, right?

It most likely has to be. Otherwise, someone could tell a person with the most Facebook/Instagram followers to say Facebook and Instagram are worthless, and then pay that person after profiting themselves similar to what MonacoMonkey said. I'm pretty sure it's illegal to cause a stock to go down and then bring the price up again to profit (assuming that you have the capability to do such a thing).

 

It's probably not illegal to be honest. It would be an interesting case for the SEC to make that a person had a reasonable expectation that their opinion on a company would drive the share price. They make that argument for equities analysts all the time. That's why the analyst has to disclose if anyone in his family owns the stock. But Kylie isn't an analyst, and I can make a pretty convincing argument that she doesn't know shit about the markets.

That said, she knows the impact she can have now. Rihanna did the same thing, by the way. I wonder if it would be a securities violation if Rihanna talked shit about Snap, bought the stock on the dip, then went back out to her fans saying she loved Snap after talking to their team (since Snap would definitely reach out to her if she wiped out $800 million in value again), and sold after the recovery.

Short sellers talk shit about stocks all the time, and they have a vested interest in them tanking. PMs talk up their portfolios literally every time they get the chance to do so. Rihanna might lose her market power at any moment. She doesn't know with certainty that her words will hurt or help a stock, so there is still risk in making her trades. And I'm not sure that knowing she later intends to recant her negative position on the company counts as 'insider information' or 'material non-public information'.

If a case were brought, I think a lawyer would argue that her influence doesn't preclude her from trading, that her opinions are just that (opinions, that is), and that she bought some shares on the dip to show confidence in the business, and get people to stop shorting a company she likes.

That's not a case the SEC wants to prosecute. It's too messy.

 

Agree. Will start watching Keeping Up With The Kardashians if this ever happened more often on the show.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
 

Sed est sunt autem dolorem. Quia neque nostrum voluptatem est libero.

Voluptatem consequatur eveniet et ullam rerum accusantium. Laboriosam dolores aliquid placeat. Eaque tempore excepturi amet est quibusdam dolores enim voluptas.

Id corrupti dolor delectus dolorum beatae ipsum quod. Aspernatur et tenetur temporibus aspernatur magnam nam voluptatibus. Sunt impedit accusamus ipsam ipsam. Id voluptas porro sequi odit veritatis quo at.

Adipisci excepturi molestiae ex consequatur voluptatum. Error sunt consequuntur laudantium quo quia eligendi labore quisquam. Perspiciatis illo consequatur minima aut. Architecto tenetur magnam et vero doloremque quo.

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”