It's automated. Not a lot of money in it, obviously its all about the flow and nothing else.

Life is easy, pay is lot compared to Eq. Deriv's but all the same its a good gig.

Highly likely to be told a computer is replacing you someday. You'd be better off going to buy side fund management if interested in cash eq

 
iambateman:
there is a huge prop component now which is a driving factor in the growth of the desk

thoughts?

People on a desk will try to sell you on that desk, in general. Google "consistency bias" or read Cialdini's book.

I've never traded equities except in my personal account. In my mind, its a pretty pure trading role. You have to be able to gauge the market. You have to have an idea about how it's going to trend. And yes I can see it having a goodly prop component.

I think if you don't want something very quant, it could be a good fit, if you like the people on the desk. You'll make good cash, and the trading skill will be transferrable to other desks if the automation ever comes through.

Earnings potential (this is idle speculation) will probably not be huge with a capital H, but you'll make more than enough to live comfortably on.

 

pros: awseome atmoshphere, everyone rocks and likes to party and hang out, hours are great, I see some of the more senior guys leave as soon as the bell rings. It can be very exciting. And hate to say it, I know most people on this boards think equities is beat, but look at the senior management ranks of any bank on the street, odds are there will be a handful of ex equity traders very high up in the bank.

cons: pay is slightly lower than some other desks (but not as much as some of these anti-equity guys might think). There is a risk of automation, but its still pretty far away. not much travel. communication with the buyside is limited to their traders, not their research analysts or PM's who actually create the trade ideas.

 

Because..if you're doing fundamental value work...and equity HF is by far the easiest HF to start, and economics are tremendous:

The appetite for seeding deals and HFs in general is tremendous. Get seeded to start a long/short fund with your buddy, get a prime to "lease" you space in one of their "hotels" (minimal overhead), run even a small amount ($50m) .. if you make 25% on that, at 2 and 20, it's $3.5m in revenue. If you grow to $200m, it's $14m in revenue. Then it's off the the races...talk about potential...

Not only that, but also these business are incredibly scalable in terms of fund size but do not require big infrascture or big teams. It's a gold mine for equity guys with little risk..even if you go for it and fail, you just go back to your little seat on the equity desk you came from..

 
HoyaOnBothSides:
Because..if you're doing fundamental value work...and equity HF is by far the easiest HF to start, and economics are tremendous:

The appetite for seeding deals and HFs in general is tremendous. Get seeded to start a long/short fund with your buddy, get a prime to "lease" you space in one of their "hotels" (minimal overhead), run even a small amount ($50m) .. if you make 25% on that, at 2 and 20, it's $3.5m in revenue. If you grow to $200m, it's $14m in revenue. Then it's off the the races...talk about potential...

Not only that, but also these business are incredibly scalable in terms of fund size but do not require big infrascture or big teams. It's a gold mine for equity guys with little risk..even if you go for it and fail, you just go back to your little seat on the equity desk you came from..

I think of greater concern would be the ease with which one would be able to raise HF funds. Where would you begin to tap for that initial deposit?
 

Hoya, how sustainable of a model is that:

The S&P Long/Short index is (correct me if I'm wrong, don't have all of my access) projected to yield about 15% this year. Massachusetts is investigating UBS gifts and low-rents to HFs (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118298981733850848.html?mod=2_1154_1), and even though they are a little more commie than most states, others could follow suit. Also, how long is the 2/20 cartel going to hold up, particularly without spectacular returns.

Newer in the industry than you, but looks like that sort of plan might be a thing of the past couple of years. Do you mind if I ask what you see out there that can help this continue?

Glory of working in equities, notice I am posting this from home at 7:30.

 
Best Response

Randomwalk,

Your points are valid, but I still think my argument holds water nonetheless for a few reasons

1) you're right - with S&P has been strong of late - but it's apples and oranges. HFs have a long and short side - the common saying in HFs is "you earn your performance fees in up markets and your management fee in down markets." A fund is supposed to earn returns only after protecting capital. Not only that, but in down markets is when you will raise assets - if the S&P is down 15 and your long/short fund is flat, money will pour in.

2) HF hotels have been going on for years - I don't see anything explicitely wrong with them, especially for a small fund.

3) 2 and 20 isn't going away anytime soon, especially for top funds. Not the 20% incentive fee anyway, which is where most of the money is made. FoHF fees are falling, but top and midde HFs are turning away money left and right there's so much demand. Institutional money is drueling over this stuff. What will change first are liquidity terms, then fees, if they ever do change.

4) I'm not arguing this is perfect, or things won't change. I'm just showing the upside to an equities background, as opposed to an ibanking one. The upside, I'll argue, is in fact far higher and more easily (though still very very difficult) attainable at that, without killing yourself and wasting your 20s.

 

Ratione corrupti aut voluptate qui minus nemo distinctio similique. Est blanditiis ducimus dolor nihil nam inventore. Ut qui minus unde officiis eum ratione sint. Quos repudiandae eaque amet. Qui suscipit possimus consequatur recusandae voluptates vel qui corporis. Doloribus repudiandae provident consequatur labore impedit voluptates.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”