Equity Research sell side: how do you think the buyside should do better to interact with you?

going to be starting in equity research at a mutual fund. i'll be be covering companies and so wanted to ask the wso community (specifically those working on the sell side) what are the characteristics of buyside analysts that you like to work the most with? what is your ideal relationship with buyside clients? what do you wish was different? what do buyside analysts do that annoy you most?

 

Just an intern, but I've heard that when buyside analysts really just string sell-side analysts along and use them just for their research - with no intention of trading with the firm - is super annoying. At some point, the sell-side analyst will just cut the buy-side folks off if they don't end up doing any business with the bank.

 

I think so, because it's not like the buy-side shops will just pay out a certain sum of money to each sell-side guy they decide at the end of the year was helpful. It's a very grey area, right; I've heard stories about how some sell-side traders/analysts simply need to remind buy-side folks, "Hey, I've helped you out right? Quid pro quo", and the buy-side guy might have honestly forgotten and will then send a trade our way. Other times, the buy-side people may not like our trader or knows a better trader elsewhere on the Street, there are just a lot of factors going into it.

Of course, this table's going to be flipped over with MIFID/unbundling, so who knows what your experience will be like. In that scenario, I'm sure the broker-voting system would work quite well because you're deciding exactly how much each sell-side analysts' thoughts are worth to you.

 
Best Response

This is an interesting spin given the question is most often asked in reverse (e.g. how can the sellside analyst be more helpful?). Buyside after all is the client in this relationship. I do think we're at the cusp of a huge shift in the sellside research model, and there will probably be 1/3rd to half as many firms in this business in the next five years.

I personally couldn't care less whether the conversation is "two-way". Frankly the Street has no business knowing what my true views are on a business, industry, etc. I'm paid to develop and share those views with my firm, not the broader market. They ultimately will be able to interpret things and make an educated guess based on the names that we own and what we are actively trading, but usually they aren't going to know in real time. There are a few sellside analysts that I know well, have traveled extensively with, and have a great relationship who will obviously be more familiar with where we are actually spending time, but the goal is for these guys to not be force feeding information about our positioning to their long/short clients.

But yeah, generally try to be respectful, don't pretend to know everything, and take care of them in the vote and you should get good service.

 

Interesting but i'm gonna have to respectfully disagree. I have friends on the long-short side who cover the same industries and they'll jump at any chance to discuss how I'm actually thinking about a name, what we own and in which portfolios, are we "active" anywhere etc. I've even had guys keep tabs on which 1x1's i'm going into at conferences by spotting me in the hotel hallways (which is a terrible strategy btw because we tend to meet with everyone.) I work for a large AM complex so perhaps it's asset dependent? But for example, I am certainly keeping tabs at what my peers at Capital/Fido/TRowe etc are doing on the names I care about. That's the shit that actually moves stocks in the medium term, not the quarterly noise out of the pods.

 

Two-way conversations. Not "hey what are your ideas for this quarter, who's going to beat, etc. I'll hang up and listen". More of "hey what do you think of this company and this potential issue, I think xxxxxx, etc.". Also don't be a jackass, whether you are right or wrong.

 

I worked a couple of years in the buyside and just moved to the sell side. There are several biasesin ss research and you should not pay that much attention to the price targets and valuation. You should focus on the reasoning behind the investment thesis of the ss analyst. The easiest way is to not annoy the ss analyst too much on his valuation but instead discuss deeply on the reasoning and the events that might affect the company.

You will enrich your thought process much more this way. At the end ss analyst are rarely right on their targets. However nobody knows a stock and the management better than ss analysts. Thats their job.

 

Having been on both sides of th table here is what I think.

Don’t waste time with an analyst, i.e. request a call with a stock you hate and aren’t prepared to change you’re mind. Always be open. Things change and the sell side gurus are deeper into some names you aren’t. Respect their knowledge and understand their reasoning. Makes for a fruitful conversation even if you don’t agree (sometimes you tell them sometimes you don’t; it isn’t a two way street. I’ll keep my views from SS until I have built a full position then I might try to change some minds).

If you are going to call for a 30,000 ft view on a stock in a space you don’t know tell the sales contact and let them know what you want and don’t ask for one of these calls in the middle of earnings unless it is urgent.

As you get to know various research providers you will gravitate to a few. Build the relationship with update calls on the space and top picks.

If they participate in II voting make sure you let your PM know who you feel has helped you the most with research, models, or idea generation. If you give them a vote let them know. This is important.

 

Ea ut laborum non maxime iusto. Eveniet hic molestiae et.

Voluptas harum distinctio et ut. Repudiandae dolorem rerum quod rerum. Non quia in ad maxime tenetur debitis. Consectetur alias ratione voluptas voluptatum aut qui. Sint et voluptas placeat dolorem non. Quia tempora qui autem sit. Temporibus architecto delectus voluptatem quaerat est ex sunt.

Officia magni quam at voluptas. A est sit voluptates iste. Nobis eveniet nobis quidem. Tempora quia aliquid quidem et sint excepturi. Aspernatur in voluptate iure itaque amet. Magni labore tempora ut cum.

Created a 1-step skincare solution for men. Purchase + reviews appreciated: www.w34th.com

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”