Thank you, that’s very helpful! One of my friend’s roommate is an analyst at CVP and has said that (obviously won’t elaborate more to preserve his anonymity). I personally really loved my conversation with the Evercore people, but interviews aren’t all that helpful given everyone is always in their sales mode

 

That is a wildly hot (read: inaccurate) take on Centerview's deal flow. My roommate works there and has been grinding, and they are bringing everyone back into the office in June as a result. A good number of CVP's deals also don't get publicly announced (I know first hand of several large transactions where they were involved), so public information is not the best source. 

As for the main point of this topic, I'd say CVP = EVR > LAZ in this case. With the deciding factor between CVP and EVR being whether you are willing to do the third year. Both CVP and EVR will give you any exit you could want, but if you want to get to the buyside as fast as possible, the 2-year path at EVR might make the most sense. If you are interested in the buyside but are willing to put in another year in banking (while getting paid on par with PE associates), hard to beat CVP.  

 

Gonna be at Evercore this summer and had an offer from Lazard. Unless you're interested in getting placed in Lazard RX, which I believe is better than Evercore's, the choice should be between Centerview and Evercore given comps and culture (I felt I made the right decision after seeing nothing substantial was discussed Lazard's recent townhall). 

If you want a career in banking, Centerview takes the cake, but otherwise, Evercore should provide better opportunities for the buy-side (supportive for recruiting).

 
Most Helpful

As others have said, I would nix Lazard and decide between EVR and CVP. Really comes down to culture and and if you’re willing to stay on for three years. If the thought of staying 3 years doesn’t turn you off, I would go to CVP personally. On par with EVR for prestige and scale of transactions, but has a stronger emphasis on mentorship and actually viewing junior bankers as team members that are worth investing time in (this might seem like a crazy concept, but a lot of places just treat juniors like a resource and don’t take the time to bring you into the deal process or actually explain the rationale behind what’s happening). 
 

As far as deal flow, I find this pretty hard to believe. I don’t work there, but have seen them across the table on many major transactions. They have a lot of rainmakers... CVP staffs on an “account” based model I believe, so your friend’s accounts probably just aren’t very active right now (essentially as an analyst you cover client XYZ, so whenever there is a deal or meeting for client XYZ, you are responsible for it. This is nice because you can really get to see the lifecycle of the client relationship and develop a deep understanding of their business, but can lead to some weeks being brutal and other weeks light).

 

Would love more understanding on this as CVP’s account system seems identical but when discussing with bankers at both firms about it my intuition pulls me to think that it’s slightly different.

Do you take on more one-off requests as part of “strategic advisory”? Maybe CVP sells it better but their emphasis on it leads me to believe perhaps they’re more involved on accounts outside of the deal than EVR.

Would love more color on this!

 

Dolore ratione aut molestiae provident. Eos facere quia molestiae amet. Ut neque quasi quos. Ut ut quia fuga consequatur explicabo pariatur et in. Animi assumenda ipsa inventore sint dolor voluptatem quasi.

Inventore quos omnis magni voluptatem quo. Adipisci saepe quae et et ea voluptate. Quos laboriosam dolor et. Voluptas exercitationem nulla fugiat a corrupti quas sunt. Qui consectetur voluptas corrupti officia. Rem voluptas ab ex ea neque id rerum.

Dolorem temporibus consequuntur ut in est earum excepturi. Maxime et cupiditate ut consequatur. Dolor cupiditate mollitia nobis perspiciatis. Eos minima modi qui eius voluptatem consectetur doloremque. Id maxime sed impedit corporis accusamus. Rerum hic impedit odit consequatur eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”