Most Helpful

In short, supply/demand, but I guess thats not super helpful.

As a really crude start, you can say the N-year treasury yield is roughly the 'average' expected risk-free interest rate over the next N years. This is the expectations hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectations_hypothesis).

In reality, this works really well on the short end (so they say the Fed controls the short end by controlling the Fed Funds rate), but as you go further out the curve (10y+) it gets more influenced by inflation (or nominal GDP), 'term premium' (as a catch-all phrase for all the stuff not easily explained by the expectations hypothesis), and idiosyncratic supply demand. Ex: Insurance companies and pensions with long-dated liabilities (they owe more PV in liabilities if rates go down) so they buy long-dated bonds (to make money to offset this if rates go down). Reason being, as you go further out the curve, even if you know with certainty what short-term interest rates will be over N years, you are taking on far too much duration/market risk to make that sort of trade pragmatic, so other factors tend to dominate.

There is also other idiosyncratic supply demand- ex: if people panic, they tend sell US stocks to buy long-dated US treasuries (because these have more risk than short-dated bonds).

 

The 2yr is most closely aligned to the expectation short term Fed Funds Rate path.

The 10yr (and then even more so the 30yr) is driven by longer term economic expectations. Since the business cycle lasts 6-12 years on avg...that puts the 10yr square in the sights of the next economic cycle (and the 30yr 3 economic cycles). The hard part is predicting the future that far out...nobody has been able to do it very well...so longer duration bonds correlate with equities and longer term economic data (like housing, inflation expectation, the credit cycle, etc..)

Its not easy, and 10 economists will have 10 different views...so its anybodies guess.

just google it...you're welcome
 

Magnam ut modi voluptas minus at aut aliquid. Distinctio sint sint assumenda magnam et qui. Consectetur ut non perferendis ex in.

Cum fugit eligendi dicta animi voluptatem praesentium et. Ratione similique et alias voluptatem id ea quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”