Trending Content
| +82 | Ex Apollo Associate Q&A (But I Actually Answer) | 123 | 2h | |
| +61 | Q&A - Anything about PE / MBA / Life | 65 | 3s | |
| +45 | How to Model SaaS Projections for Interviews | 51 | 6m | |
| +37 | [Technical doubt]: Cash sweep and mandatory amortization | 10 | 6h | |
| +26 | Partners Group Long Term | 8 | 1d | |
| +24 | Is internal reporting at most funds really so Excel & PPT heavy still? | 8 | 16h | |
| +23 | European Megafunds (based on PEI 2023) | 17 | 2d | |
| +18 | How much thematic work / industry research do you guys do? | 1 | 11h | |
| +18 | Advent NYC Culture/WLB - 2024 update | 9 | 6h | |
| +18 | How is your life in PE? | 12 | 9h |
Career Resources
same here, my firm has replaced bloomberg with ciq for like a year or so, i personally like FactSet more though, cuz I think it does look more user friendly lol
Go for CapIQ + Thomson Reuters + Mergermarket
Exactly what my old shop had, but it still isn't Bloomberg
I am a CIQ person myself, but I think it depends on whichever you have had the most experience with in the past. Generally speaking, they are the same, but learning new excel plugins would be a huge pain.
Depends on your needs. Factset has a friendly UI and can pull CapitalIQ data. But, CapIQ has the best fundamental data and is the only thing I really trust on equities.
Who cares - they both suck
IMHO, Factset is much much better then Bloomberg for IB. Only my friends, who are FX traders like bloomberg for their chats. CapIQ sucks.
Asperiores eaque impedit quia dolores nostrum hic. Rerum voluptatum ullam eius ut. Sed eligendi enim tempore sapiente eum quasi. Earum reprehenderit qui ut non qui dignissimos molestias. Reprehenderit laborum dolorum esse quas sequi ullam dolores maxime. Explicabo ipsum atque harum magni omnis possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...