fadsf
dsaafasdfasd
Keywords
dsaafasdfasd
+186 | Ideal College/Recruiting Timeline | 38 | 2d | |
+116 | Military Officer vs. IB analyst | 42 | 4h | |
+75 | Lied on CV? | 56 | 23h | |
Got fired after 1.5 years as an Analyst, want to stay in Banking but I am confused | 10 | 1d | ||
+26 | Amazing offer but I’m drowning in debt | 13 | 2d | |
+25 | Is there a point to networking if you have (nepo)? | 7 | 1d | |
+23 | Are Single Managers Just Not Hiring? | 10 | 4d | |
+23 | How do I go about explaining huge gaps in a CV for Spring & Summers? | 11 | 1d | |
+21 | Job Switch Advice | 6 | 15h | |
+21 | IB > PE, except burned out. What now? | 8 | 5h |
Career Resources
Shouldnt be that hard to get a buyside job at small shops really. It is def easier than getting a BB IBD analyst offer (at least in Europe).
I think you will lose much of the pros that the legit IBD stint brings, such as brand name, solid training, connections, etc.
Buyside is a very broad term.
What do you mean in banking you don't generate business for the firm? I think I understand the bigger point you are trying to get at but that sentence is fundamentally wrong.
Do both? Going directly to the buyside will be more difficult unless you have a specific skillset (for example, you're a super quant and you can land at a quant HF that looks for that) but there's no harm in trying as long as you keep shooting for IB jobs as well. I'm going to assume it will be difficult to land one of the ultra coveted slots at one of the MF's where they recruit a few direct undergrads because you're from a non target and didn't intern at one of them or at a BB and realize that the smaller shops don't typically hire undergrads because they run lean and don't typically have training programs (we basically use IB analyst programs as the training). So don't be disappointed if you don't land on the buyside right away (hint: lots of people would like to do that) and just don't let it hinder your IB search.
Jumping to the buyside directly has some disadvantages that you should be aware of... 1) Depending on the firm and its size, you may be making models on your first day, but you could also be spending a large portion of your time cold calling. 2) You will not have a structured training process. 3) Some of the times, the models that you build internally may not be as complex/nice-looking as the ones you see in IB. 4) Your transactional experience will be very limited.
Some may argue with some of these points, but this is what I've seen from my own personal experience. I was like you at one point in time, but I quickly realized the benefit of going to a BB/EB/upper-MM IB for an analyst gig.
Ratione aut sit occaecati magnam modi molestias. Qui fugiat in repellendus et eos nihil sunt omnis. Amet corrupti fugiat est non. Possimus a temporibus eum. Quo reprehenderit dolores quasi mollitia sed voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...