Mine is with Jeff Evans (#977) who was a rescue climber on Mt. Everest.
What are yours? I've just recently started listening to him and they're great.
On a real note: I enjoy that Joe is allowing politicians (Andrew Yang, Bernie Sanders, Dan Crenshaw etc.) to be on the show to discuss policy issues at length. I'm hoping in the future that we'll get away from the sound bite-esk types of debates that the Networks currently hosts.
| +90 | GF doesn’t care about her looks | 57 | 13h | |
| +60 | Affair with my Associate… In Desperate Need for Advice | 23 | 1d | |
| +51 | How to sound more eloquent? | 19 | 7h | |
| +40 | 400k/year in HVAC sales? | 26 | 2d | |
| +37 | WSO Ranking On Resume??? | 9 | 5h | |
| +37 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 13 | 15h | |
| +33 | Would you rather live alone in an outer borough or with roommates in Manhattan? | 23 | 3d | |
| +28 | Why do people listen to Jim Cramer Investing Advice? | 11 | 13h | |
| +27 | Carnivore Diet | 12 | 14h | |
| +26 | Is my boss gaslighting me? | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I love all my kids equally
you should start a podcast
It's on the list, but getting the technical shit set up is my hinderance and I have a lot of irons in the fire. That's so funny, I was just thinking about this while driving like an hour ago. If somebody came and set up the software end of shit for me, I'd do it for sure. It would be like 25% real estate interviews and 75% whoever I find interesting or funny.
probably ron miscavage. He is an ex scientologist who speaks out against his son David Miscavage who runs the church. Anyway scientology has brainwashed and extorted people, yet members of the church will blindly obey everything. Long story short I live in manhattan and one day I was kinda of drunk getting on the train and I notice this lady reading an L ron Hubbard book. So I was like you realize your reading a book by a plagairist? And she immediately goes on the defense starts arguing I need to go visit an actual church. I than bring countless bits and pieces of information about scientology hurting people and she says its all lies to make money. I than say that people usually dont actually make a lot of money off digital journalism. Finally she got really angry at me and called me a religious bigot and I decided to leave. I def wouldnt have done that sober but I was curious to see how she would react. I could def sense that there was a cult like aspect and response to her beliefs much like Miscavage said.
Definitely not an asshole move bro
Why did you dig into her un-asked on the train? Scientology is a destructive organization sure, but it does seem a bit much to call her out on it on the train no? Kind of her business...
Both Theo Von episodes, Dominick Cruz, Mike Tyson, Bobby Lee, both David Cho episodes, Georges St Pierre, Firas Zahabi, Hannibal Buress
Oh dude that episode where Hanibal got drunk and decided to get into an intellectual debate with Sam Harris was gold.
Despite him being a huge piece of shit I found the last Alex Jones episode hilarious.
Why do people hate him? I only know him from Rogan where he gets drunk and says hilarious shit. So I'm not at all upset by this fella.
He doxed Sandy Hook families. Meaning he said their addresses on his show.
well, do some research on the guy and we'll talk. He's a national embarrassment
Dan Bilzerian one has got to be in my top 3
Paul Stammet the mushroom guy
Dude you know about microdosing then quit bluffin' Didn't he discuss that shit extensively?
maybe I missed that part. Besides where am I actually supposed to get mushrooms anyhow? Will be in Cali next week, but still... Marijuana is at least legal and with bonafide ADD I bet I can get a prescription
yeah! super interesting
Naval Ravikant was probably my absolute favorite. Outside of that, listening to Alex Jones’ conspiracies was pretty hilarious.
Alex Jones speaks metaphorically because he cannot speak overtly about certain cabals/cartels.
He could speak however he wants, I still found it hilarious. It’s like 4chan became a living person.
so you believe his cabal rants?
this one was really good
Naval Ravikant off the top of my head.
The one with Adam Conover. Adam does ruin everything, including his credibility on this episode.
Fuck that guy. And fuck the Stuff You Should Know guys. I got in a heated email confrontation with one of them. They do this bullshit tertiary amount of research on serious subjects that matter a lot to some people that some people know a lot about. About topics that matter to the world. And this bullshit tertiary research pulls up a bunch of bullshit misconceptions and straight up falsehoods that would be revealed as such if they actually sunk their teeth into a subject. They haven't tasked themselves with creating new ideas. They are just regurgitators. And they suck at that even. 'Oh, but Goldie, they don't have time.' OK, then go work at a radio station. Maybe this task isn't up your alley. So I got in a heated debate over their UV radiation episode. I sent them some facts and sources contradicting a lot of what they said and they replied with a bunch of soft emotional garbage and finally, in all caps, wrote some shit about 'TELL THAT TO MY AUNT WHO'S DYING OF MELANOMA'. Just reeked of incompetence and emotional frailty.
And that Adam asshole, or his team of 19-year-old gender studies majors or whoever, does even less research than them and speaks with even more annoying, arrogant, self-important, and most importantly - completely manufactured - confidence.
Oh but anyway, the reason I came here: How come Rogan and Tim Ferris have never done a podcast together? Is there a beef?
"How come Rogan and Tim Ferris have never done a podcast together? Is there a beef?"
pretty sure they did do a podcast together
I've enjoyed the recent pods with politicians (namely Dan Crenshaw and Bernie) where both have time to get into policy/world view in details, and in turn, come off far more thoughtful and less bombastic than their stump speeches. I've never been a Bernie fan but he was far more composed and coherent than I expected
Really? Bernie came off like a completely out-of-touch man of fairly average intellect and above-average hubris. He has no business leading men.
And Dan Crenshaw said it's easy for regular citizens to disarm someone carrying an AR-15, but yes Bernie is out of touch because he says healthcare is a human right in every developed country except this one.
I agree that he has no business being a leader of men. I did think that his proposal to tax high-velocity security trades to forgive certain student loans is an interesting idea with merit.
Why though? Why do traders have to pay for Bernie's bullshit?
It's not Bernie's bullshit, it's America's bullshit - this will become the taxpayer's problem. $1.6 trillion in student debt and the average student loan is 60% greater than 15 years ago while the real median household income has barely budged. 25% of all student loan debtors cannot keep up with payments - this is expected to hit 40% by 2023.
https://www.newsweek.com/2019/08/23/student-debt-loans-truth-facts-cove…
So you want me to pay for your education is what you're getting at. I paid for my own. You should too. But you think you're entitled to an education and I don't agree.
I have $0 in student loans. However, I realize (as you should too) that the student loan burden is crushing a middle class which already is experiencing little to no real wage growth and declining career opportunities due to automation and offshoring. The plutocrats in this country have benefited immensely from a rigged system - leveling out the playing field a little through a relatively benign
Nobody was coerced into their student loans. A lot of people made a bet, based largely off of the desire to conform and a lack of foresight, and that bet is playing out poorly. Myself and a lot of other people made bets in other directions that are playing out much more favorably. Myself and a lot of other people chose sensible degrees at sensible public schools and worked all through high school and college to afford it. We're better off for it in many ways. It's not logical at all that people who choose to trade financial instruments should be taxed to uplift the wealthiest, most self-entitled middle class population in the world. Even if these people were starving to death, which they are far from, I'd say let them. Maybe their kids won't be such idiot conformists.
Let me ask you a two-part question: Do you believe in personal responsibility? If so, to what extent?
Also, would you rather pay for it? American taxpayers WILL cover these defaults if we don't create a policy to handle it. Do you realize most of the loans are backed by the Federal government i.e you and I? It is inevitable that the American taxpayers are going to be left holding the bag which includes you.
I totally agree that many of these people made stupid decisions and financed themselves through school including their living costs without considering working. I empathize with how frustrating this must be to those like yourself. However, the cat is out of the bag and YOU will be left cleaning up the mess is nothing is done. Instead of the middle class again taking the hit, just like when Obama bailed out all the investment bankers with TARP, we need to offload this onto people who can afford a small tax.
Made it through 20 mins of the Bernie one. Turned it off when he failed to go into the history of why we have the lobbying aspect of the political system, since that is one of the main tenets of his whole philosophy.
Joe Rogan is very entertaining, and I love how he's open minded about having a wide range of guests on. Sometimes however he really fails to do even basic research and talks out his ass, when even a casual Google search could have clued him in. Examples: saying Patrick Baboumian didn't have a European record and just measured his weightlifting in the backyard. The dude holds multiple European and global titles. Examples: half the sh*t he says about diet is totally off, and shows a total lack of prep, and just quoting pseudo-science / bro-science. Still, most of the time he's quite entertaining and he won't shy away from having a wide range of guests on, and that's really admirable. He's also really good at getting people to open up. So, props.
What do you disagree with him about on nutrition? He doesn't do his own research, but he curates guests who are mostly extremely on top of shit in the fitness and nutrition department. You don't like what Rhonda Patrick has to say?
He also makes no claim to be an educator or even informed on anything outside of martial arts and comedy. Unlike the Stuff You Should Know dickwads or Adam Ruins Everything. He doesn't even pretend he's an expert in bowhunting while being a 99th percentile hunter. He gets together and bullshits with his buddies. You can't stop to google shit all the time while having a free-flowing, hilarious conversation. And Jamie is pulling shit up all the time. He does have experts on but you can't be upset at the guy for speculating about shit. Speculation is fun. We get together with people and laugh and speculate about shit. That's what humans do.
"What do you disagree with him about on nutrition? "
There's a ton of stuff he states as matter-of-fact about nutrition that is either highly debatable or just empirically wrong. Bascially, I have the same issue about him as you have about Adam. I could go into specific cases, but that's not the point - the point is the overall lack of prep or adherence to easily researchable facts.
It's entirely possible that they are all my favorite episodes... it's entirely possible.
IBankedUP pull that shit up
I will, Young Jamie.
So many great episodes with celebrities [Henry Rollins, Joey Diaz, Bill Burr] and journalists [Tim Pool, Michael Pollan, Abby Martin] that I enjoy and admire, but every episode with Gad Saad [evolutionary psychologist] or Chris Kresser [investigative medicine and health] are eps that I have listened to more than once, because of all the insights and information on the topics discussed.
Bill Burr's rants on Joe Rogan are some of my FAVORITE internet pieces ever. Dude just brings out the old man anger every single time and its hilarious.
duncan trussel
The video thing on this site makes no sense. But Rogan fans are missing out.
Both Alex Jones episodes, Elon Musk, and Andrew Yang.
Can’t do any better than a high Alex Jones rambling on about inter dimensional child molestors.
Eos optio totam corrupti et voluptatem. Ad aliquam omnis est delectus dolorum nulla delectus sint. Debitis id incidunt excepturi odio voluptatem ex est. Reprehenderit perspiciatis omnis et magni ipsa et perferendis voluptates. Voluptatem et magnam quo saepe rerum et consequatur. Iste labore laboriosam magnam ipsa.
Et suscipit voluptatibus sunt dolores nihil iste aut sint. Ut expedita nulla beatae officiis. Temporibus doloribus eaque consequatur animi consectetur est deserunt.
Maiores impedit eveniet quidem et sed cum. Nobis sit impedit voluptate voluptate non animi.
Iure hic et tempore a sit. Autem voluptas et doloribus alias eaque fugit dolores expedita.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Consequuntur in at est iste. Ut veritatis et et vel aliquam. Officiis ut similique ipsa aliquam nemo quasi cupiditate. Neque repellat rerum id facere dolores aliquam. Debitis nihil ut dignissimos ut. Minima quia laudantium facilis sunt. Non dicta non deleniti.
Odit consectetur amet alias qui ab dolores est. Eos omnis distinctio distinctio nemo et. Iusto vel ut sunt et facere velit nemo.
Eum reprehenderit quia dolor doloribus. Corporis voluptatem soluta et commodi quia aut vel.
Soluta et qui fuga rem. Aut eos ut dolorem et non saepe. Soluta vel facere consectetur vel voluptatem. Ipsam autem nobis quia. Animi quaerat et sunt dolorem dolores. Quo repellat dolor deserunt ut. Occaecati aperiam et et dicta.
Sint possimus excepturi omnis deleniti nam quod. Natus sed ullam dolores sunt unde inventore tempora. Ipsa eum numquam placeat corporis necessitatibus a aut. Cumque corrupti sint quo quia tempora impedit quia.
Voluptatem non molestiae enim ea. Earum qui enim omnis quibusdam culpa quos deleniti. Numquam non repellat excepturi est veniam repudiandae pariatur. Modi quaerat repudiandae maiores dolores.
Magni totam ut illum aspernatur qui nihil sit. Reprehenderit similique excepturi eaque error asperiores quia. Fugit adipisci et aspernatur dolores amet.
Dolores velit nobis adipisci autem ratione in. Sint similique rerum ut dolorem. Repellendus non praesentium soluta dolor molestiae dolorem.