Fixed Income Research

I was recently talking to a hedge fund manager about career paths and the qualities he looks for in hiring analysts for his fund. Before the conversation, I had always discounted fixed income research as a career stepping stone. However he made an interesting comment about fixed income research vis-a-vis equity research. In his opinion, Equity Research Analysts, while they are very knowledgeable about an industry or a company, are largely concerned with earnings growth, price targets, and the next product. On the other hand, a fixed income research analyst largely focuses on weather the investor will get his money back. As a result, the fixed income analyst will do a much more thorough analysis of a company's balance sheet, income statement, and other SEC filings compared to an equity research analyst. While the fixed income analyst is largely concerned with preservation of capital, the equity research analyst is much more focused on EPS growth and catalysts for stock price appreciation.
As a result, this hedge fund manager views a prospective hire with experience in fixed income research as a major plus. Indeed, he requires all his analysts to do a rotation on the fixed income research desk in order to gain that experience. The focus on a company's credit worthiness and financial strength acquired through fixed income research seems to be a valuable one.
On this site, for better or for worse, there seems to be a predetermined path that is recommended for all of the aspiring John Paulsons and David Teppers. While this is just one person's view, I wonder what you all think about it?

 

1) It is unlikely that he is going out there and hiring 50 jr sellside fixed income research analysts - so WGAF? He will continue to hire ex IB analysts. If it is a distressed/credit fund PMs will value restructuring, lev fin and other credit intensive IB groups 10x the value of a random FI research guy. 2) That's very simplistic. The analytical rigor in credit analysis is very limited compared to equities. I'll leave that statement as a teaser to see if anyone disputes.

 
DurbanDiMangus:
That's very simplistic. The analytical rigor in credit analysis is very limited compared to equities. I'll leave that statement as a teaser to see if anyone disputes.

I work for a large traditional AM firm, have worked in a quant fixed income research group and recently switched into a fundamental equity research group. I strongly disagree with your statement. It's actually the opposite. I find my work in FI research much more intellectually demanding than equities research.

You are probably gonna say, well, it's QUANT FI vs FUNDAMENTAL equities, of course the quant stuff is more complicated, but that's exactly my point. Quantitative research is the bread and butter of FI research, just like fundamental research is more useful than quantitative research in equities. So I think the "analytical rigor" is higher in FI than equities just because of the nature of the asset classes.

Now if you are just talking about researching credit worthiness, then yea no shit I agree with you. That's like rating agency work and what kind of sophisticated investor actually trust them?

 

Wouldnt the level of balance sheet analysis really befall on the specific shop? I mean, lets say you're a deep value fund, you'd be analysing notes and the numbers to do see if they are accounting irregularities you can exploit either in the short side or the long side.

 

True... I once worked for a PM at a very large hedge fund. He remarked that his interest in hiring me vs. others was that I had fixed income experience (coincidentally he worked for the Fed) before going to B-school and then the hedge fund.. Just my $.02 worth...

 

old-line asset mgmnt: higher base salary, lower bonus ... unless high flying like a HF ... maybe the chance to become a PM in 9-12 years if you work hard, stay with it, get a CFA.

you'll need to read your 10-k's and q's. lots of individual prospectuses. you won't have to build great models, but you'll have to build and maintain some -- sell side will give you their models, I think. you might get an industry-sector to cover.

role obviously depends. what do they do? do they present themselves as a great asset manager & way to get beta + a little alpha to corp bonds as an asset class? they own a portfolio for their investors like a mutual fund?

most importantly, be able to tell a story about how you'd look at a bond

e.g. junk bond co

it's a host of issues: -legal, any covenants to cover you? where does the particular issuance fit in the capital structure? what claims does it have? -organizational, do you like management? do you like direction of the company? how it is set up? are the strategic choices smart? who are the other owners on the co's cash flows?
-finance, can the co COVER ITS PAYMENTS? can the co return principal/roll when it'll have to? what is the rating? duration? convexity - are there embedded options that'd let the co refinance giving negative convex? or is it puttable? is it convertible to equity? -trading, liquidity of the issue?

alternatively, think of the risks, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-yield_debt has a good start list. get some books, the kinds you'd find in a b-school library.

knowning option adjusted spread might start to set you apart, dunno ...

 

credit is considered to be a bit more quantitivate than equity - this is largely a function of the product itself. equity research will often incorporate the issuer's "story" - which may not be necessary for credit.

credit is divided up into sectors and HY and IG i.e. there may be a senior analyst that covers IG retailers AND another senior analyst that covers HY retailers.

Comp is pretty similar to equity - may be a little higher than ER depending on firm.

 

FI research is not only about bonds. No you don't come up with a credit rating and compare it with historical spreads, your analisis needs to be much deeper. You do pretty much the same as an ER analyst, and you analyze the country macro data instead of the cash flows, ebitda etc if you are talking about govis. You come up with reasons why you think the market has mispriced something. For example you can look at correlations between different assets. As an example many people saw, over the summer Italian bonds were overprized compared to the Spanish ones, since the risk of Italy going bankrupt was much higher by pretty much any metric. However the risk premium was much lower. So many people went long Spain and short BTPs, which payed off pretty well until the ECB intervention. You also prepare possible scenarios for different results in macroeconomic releases, auctions, central bank interventions and things like that. You take a position on whether you think they are going to move rates or intervene the currency or they are going to get screwed in the next auction and why.

As for the report itself, the outcome generally is a target entry price and a target exit price.

 

It is at a PWM firm if that helps with your question. Therefore I assume its investment grade since it is trust related, however like I said before, I have limited knowledge to that is just my answer based on what I know as of now.

 

Depends on the group, but you're probably looking at 7-7:30 or 8 on average.

Obviously, that can vary..and there will definitely be nights that you are in the office well past 8, but I'd say 13 hours a day is probalby in the ball park.

Weekends...depends on the group; but i don't think its common to be in on every saturday.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”