Full-Time Associate - MS Generalist vs. JPM Coverage
Hello Everyone -
I'm deciding between two offers and need your help. I'm a post MBA Associate from a top-20 school and was lucky to get two offers. I don't know if I necessarily see a long-term career for myself in banking but would do 2-3 years and hope to make a move to a Corporate Strategy and Development role as a high manager/low director.
Do you have any recommendation on which path is better? MS associate starts off as a pool while JPM would be a specific coverage group (not M&A or healthcare but well regarded group)
I could see myself working in industry the coverage role. However, I'm also confident I'll get that coverage role at MS after my year is up. But I'm not sold on that industry area; may go small tech start-up or something
Does either brand name make a big difference in terms of getting a corp dev job afterwards?
thanks for the help
Eos expedita fugit ut recusandae et eveniet. Dolore id laborum harum maxime non architecto incidunt. Et sapiente beatae quo atque et deleniti. Mollitia incidunt odit sed quo. Adipisci eveniet sunt delectus dolores. Et necessitatibus id ut pariatur placeat illum ut odio.
Incidunt eum voluptatem provident quis recusandae perspiciatis sit. Asperiores autem officiis qui eveniet eius officia eaque et. Amet nesciunt qui nobis ipsam. Eligendi harum porro non omnis.
Dolores illo fugiat et odio. Delectus quod reprehenderit corporis accusamus qui voluptas. Voluptate est sit dolores quas adipisci id distinctio. Non qui consectetur exercitationem consequuntur ducimus in laborum. Eveniet voluptatem sequi nihil commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...