Future of REPE

I currently work in acquisitions at a mid-market REPE fund investing in all asset types.

Curious, is anyone concerned about the future lucrativeness of the business if office real estate becomes less important in our lives? Of course multifamily and industrial are hot, but I wonder about the viability of continuing to raise institutional capital compared to other strategies (corp. PE, VC, debt fund, etc.) if the value of office properties tanks from systemic change in use. 

 
Most Helpful

Not really going to comment on the value of office part of the question beyond noting that the "smart" money is betting on the sustained value of the asset class (I am not about to bet against). I mean, do you really want to be the dude sitting in your living room/basement on zoom when most of team is in the conference room?? As soon as FOMO kicks in, I think this debate will end, especially when the gunners get back to doing what they must for promotion in all the white collar industries that rent office space.

To the question of "future lucrativeness" of the private real estate business, I think the big question has little to do with COVID, but all do with the maturation of the industry. I mean first things first, most institutional investors have increased and/or recommitted to real estate allocations in 2020, so availability of capital not likely to be the issue. The issue, if there is one, is fee compression and competition. As the big LPs demand lower and lower fees, the smaller one's will want the same deals and are going to continue to band together to make it happen. Plus, expect more and more LPs to open up direct platforms and thus negate the need for fund managers (CalPERS is a good example), or they will just use the PE shop has a "front" for small fee (this is basically what SMAs are/have become). This will reduce the profitability of the fund managers, and thus the big bonuses they have been able to pay this last decade. 

This shouldn't be a surprise, the area of mainline financial management (i.e. stocks and bonds) has been dealing with this for decades. Wall street firms do not have the same advantages when anyone can and does get a Bloomberg terminal these days. Luckily real estate still has the advantage of being far more complex and nearly impossible to commoditize to the point it can be keyed into a Bloomberg for easy trading. So, real estate operators and investment managers will still have a place, but being simple "middlemen" and "fund aggregators" is going to get more and more commoditized. 

Thus, expect more "private equity" type ventures (not just RE, but PE/HF types also) to look for more "public money". That's the next frontier, getting vehicles approved and fitted for 401k/403b/IRA style accounts that give access to the asset class but have the liquidity/framework for small investors (non-trade REITs/BDCs and Interval Mutual Funds are doing this already). The crowdfunding space will continue to get explored by big institutions, but that world has still be set for accredited investors. 

Should note, all this activity should be good for creating more and more jobs at various places (like on direct real estate platforms at institutional investors). 

 

No worries. Real estate has had crashes before. Prices adjust. People become willing to take risks. Office square footage may right size with assets being redeveloped. It’s a market and equilibrium will be found. Sure, firms focused on office might have issues, but other firms will pop up to take its place. If anything, the feds are pumping more liquidity into the system. If benchmark rates stay lower for longer, pension funds etc will need somewhere to place capital and they may allocate more to real estate. 
On the other side of this, we’ve begun to see some large tech companies expand into more space through this and start looking at the hub and spoke model of office using. In 24 months companies could be upsizing as they come back wanting larger footprints. No one really knows how the cookie will crumble. 

 

Omnis expedita dolores aut repudiandae libero voluptatibus quasi. Sapiente qui nobis earum nisi aut. Animi distinctio autem illum iste quam praesentium dignissimos.

Consequatur nesciunt voluptas et voluptatibus vel est. Non sed est atque veritatis. Harum eveniet et ullam aliquam distinctio recusandae. Qui laudantium eius libero nesciunt repellendus voluptatem et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”