Glencore or Trafigura graduate program? (or others)

Background: Undergrad student looking to jump into physical metals trading (main interest is in copper, zinc, lead concentrates)

Just trying to get a better understanding of the differences in the way these firms are run and, ultimately, which offers better prospects for a grad entering the space.

On the surface, it seems as if Trafigura has more opportunities for international exposure earlier on with its Global, Shanghai and Montevideo Graduate programs (willing to go anywhere). Also, my primary interest being in metals, Trafigura has a metals program starting in Geneva or Shanghai. On the flip side though, I’ve also read that Traf doesn’t tend to make its grads traders and prefers to hire traders from elsewhere.

Glencore only has a graduate programme for oil but it seems as if Glencore makes more of its graduates traders.

Also considering roles in mining giants in logistics/commercial or the masters in Geneva route.

I was wondering if there are any people with experience on any of the grad programs or those in the industry who would be able to give some input.

 
I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Believe you're right: Glencore, as far as I can see (in Europe), only has the "global trader / commercial graduate" programme for their oil division. Honestly, I have no idea how you'd get into Glencore's metals department fresh out of uni.

Traf, on the other hand, have graduate programmes for both oil and metals. What's more, while at Glencore I think it's pretty common that you stay in the office you're hired to, Trafigura likes to move people around - for your last rotation as a graduate, you're often posted somewhere "abroad".

A key difference, however, is that very few graduates at Trafigura end up becoming traders. It even says on the graduate website that their programme is not expressly a programme to become a trader. Conversely (and this is only a guess), I'd say that if Glencore are advertising their graduate programme as a "global trader" scheme, you stand a better chance of eventually being given the chance to trade somewhere down the line. This logic seems to be supported by the fact that Trafigura routinely hires externally to fill trading seats, whereas, as far as I can make out, Glencore does not.

It's also worth mentioning that, as per their website, Trafigura's oil scheme is for those with little-to-no experience, whereas their metals scheme seems to have a preference for those "with a few years of experience". Unless you've got a decent amount of internship experience under your belt, I'd have a long think about how committed you are to the metals market and whether: i) You'd rather work somewhere else (e.g. mining) for a few years and then transition; or ii) Try your hand instead at oil.

At the end of the day, I think they both look like phenomenal opportunities. Regardless of which shop you end at (if you're so lucky), each programme is very much what you yourself make of it. Neither place is just gonna hand you a seat on the trading floor - both processes are gonna be very competitive both to get into in the first place and, subsequently, to transition to a risk-taking role. I'd apply to both (why not?) and see where it gets you - if you get offered both seats, that's a different conversation to have later on.

"Work is the curse of the drinking classes" - Oscar Wilde
 

Aperiam et quia tenetur modi praesentium rem sunt. Repellendus dolorem et est ad et consequatur omnis. Numquam impedit sed sed omnis nihil incidunt dolor. Sint autem ipsam cumque et corrupti modi laboriosam ducimus. Reprehenderit soluta ab aliquid doloremque.

Et eaque et delectus iusto. Aliquam necessitatibus accusamus numquam at. Quia quo ut soluta. Sit dolores id deserunt et pariatur aut. Aut debitis omnis atque.

Non quis odio occaecati autem minus ut deserunt mollitia. Et occaecati hic eum tenetur voluptatibus.

Dolor dignissimos et similique adipisci reiciendis eligendi. Et maxime doloribus fugiat est autem. Mollitia inventore ad architecto tempora esse voluptas velit. Ut est blanditiis corrupti similique fugiat qui. Quod libero voluptatem quae. Facere quasi tenetur assumenda quia fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”