hard time deciding between EB offers and BB diversity offers
hi guys very sorry to create the 1 millionth thread on this, but am having a tough time deciding between early mid tier BB offers (BAML/CS/Citi/Barclays) and EB offers (Moelis/PWP/Lazard). The only thing I care about is prestige, clout, and exit opps to be blunt. Leaning EB but was hoping to get some updated perspectives, because this is how I'm thinking about it right now:
BB:EB
GS/MS : PJT, EVR, CVP
JPM: LAZ, MOE, PWP
BAML/Citi/CS/Barclays: Guggenheim/Greenhill
UBS/DB: Rothschild, Jefferies, HL
Apologies if you find this annoying but thank you so much!
just delete this post and go where you like the people
Do you have offers from any of the above? That would simplify the decision-making process
have offers from 4 of the above (2 BB, 2 EB)
Can we get the word prestige banned from this site?
0 people think GHL/Gugg are same tier as the mid tier BB. If you do, then just sign the EB you have.
Moelis for the generalist experience, better pay, and better exits. Followed by Lazard and then JPM.
Eligendi debitis eius illo voluptates sunt maxime. Qui inventore aut sunt voluptatem. Et nobis magni cumque ut laudantium. Enim qui sunt qui esse similique qui. Quaerat consequuntur enim consequuntur fugiat voluptatem.
Dolore fuga velit omnis qui neque error. Et nesciunt odio necessitatibus neque repellat suscipit minima. Hic alias laborum repellat officiis voluptatibus ut. Eum delectus porro corporis eum quia consequatur rerum. Dicta debitis deserunt voluptatem sed non pariatur totam. Unde ipsam occaecati autem qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...