Healtcare.gov

I just watched the hearing on the Obamacare website fiasco. It was comical to see 80 plus year old congress people talk about websites and other congress people try to figure out what scale-ability means. The whole thing makes me think we would all be better be off beating ourselves over the head with a pan.

 

How about we require that anyone making rules about computers actually know how to use one. Personally, I think that humanity makes progress each time the last elders of the old generation die off. Because grandpa doesn't know what an interwebz is, the legislative process has to grind to a halt? How about ship them off the the home, they've outlived their usefullness.

LOL at all the contractors passing the buck around. Are there any big kids at this thing? Jeez, how about just hire some whiz kids from Silicone Valley, this shouldn't even be an issue.

Get busy living
 

We've spent $600 million on a website that doesn't work while issuing a no-bid contract to a Canadian IT firm. The Obamacare supporters like UFOInsider aren't going to weasel their way out of this thing by laughing at old people. The fact is, this website fiasco is demonstrative of exactly how completely incompetent and corrupt our government is. This isn't even a surprise to me. Only to left wing liberal Democrats has this level of incompetence come as a surprise.

 

What's hilarious is that we've actually got idiot journalists like Ezra Klein debating proper software development methodology. Are you fucking kidding me...

I would bet my first, second, and third-born children that the author of this piece hadn't heard of "agile development" until 12 hours before she had to write this article:

"The better way to do things is a school of software development called Agile -- it's been around since the 1950s, was basically codified in the early 2000s, now has a whole non-profit devoted to it, and is the dominant form of software design in teams. Rather than moving from one static stage to the next, it emphasizes constant iteration and testing, with prototypes building on prototypes so the endpoint is something that works. The only problem, from a government perspective, is that you need to be comfortable with not knowing exactly that they will look like." via The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/21/the-way-gove…

No wait, they should be using "polymorphism" instead:

"Sure, big projects require more code than small ones. But my programmer friends tell me a number like 500 million suggests the Healthcare.gov contractors may be writing their own code in many places where they'd be better off relying on open-source external libraries. They may also be solving problems via copy-and-paste rather than more elegant programming techniques such as inheritance or polymorphism." via Slate: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/10/21/healthcare_gov_probl…

 
LBJ's hair:

What's hilarious is that we've actually got idiot journalists like Ezra Klein *debating proper software development methodology*. Are you fucking kidding me...

I would bet my first, second, and third-born children that the author of this piece hadn't heard of "agile development" until 12 hours before she had to write this article:

"The better way to do things is a school of software development called Agile -- it's been around since the 1950s, was basically codified in the early 2000s, now has a whole non-profit devoted to it, and is the dominant form of software design in teams. Rather than moving from one static stage to the next, it emphasizes constant iteration and testing, with prototypes building on prototypes so the endpoint is something that works. The only problem, from a government perspective, is that you need to be comfortable with not knowing exactly that they will look like."
via The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/20...

No wait, they should be using "polymorphism" instead:

"Sure, big projects require more code than small ones. But my programmer friends tell me a number like 500 million suggests the Healthcare.gov contractors may be writing their own code in many places where they'd be better off relying on open-source external libraries. They may also be solving problems via copy-and-paste rather than more elegant programming techniques such as inheritance or polymorphism."
via Slate: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/10/21...

Not bad sir, shitty day and I got a laugh out of it.

Rarely will any of my posts have enough forethought/structure to be taken seriously.
 
DCDepository:

FYI, Ezra Klein is a "he", more or less. Thought I'd correct that.

Yeah he wasn't the author of that piece. Some girl wrote it for Klein's "Wonkblog" though, so I still blame him for it.

 

Y'all can be as hung up on your political views as you like, I'm buying HC insurance stox. The point of our jobs is to make money, not be so hung up on our ethical preferances that we pass up profitable opportunities. The finance folks that can't see the upside here are the same type of dolts who have been selling off for the last three years and missing out a bull market.

You disagree, maybe find another job, I don't know what to tell you.

Get busy living
 
UFOinsider:

Y'all can be as hung up on your political views as you like, I'm buying HC insurance stox. The point of our jobs is to make money, not be so hung up on our ethical preferances that we pass up profitable opportunities. The finance folks that can't see the upside here are the same type of dolts who have been selling off for the last three years and missing out a bull market.

You disagree, maybe find another job, I don't know what to tell you.

Who said anything about profiting or not profiting? There's an entire thread with you sucking the proverbial c*ck of Obamacare just a few weeks ago. The government is too incompetent to build a website that could have been built with a pdf matrix and a GoDaddy account for $50 and yet you think the government should control the healthcare system with 10,500+ pages of rules and regulations that were not even read or understood by the authors.

I want you to man up and admit that the American federal government is too incompetent to manage the system well and that this healthcare law isn't "reform" at all.

 
Best Response

If they can't fix this, you're right. I'm somewhat confused how the contractors they hired are having such a hard time to build this. However, I see the conceptual part of this as superior to the current arrangment. I see the HC industry approaching the levels of efficiency and cost effectiveness of the auto insurance business with this system. People can oppose this on ideological grounds, but even that baffles me considering these are the same people that liked the system Romney set up. Personally, I'm apolitical and basically interested in ethics and the actual policy more than who gets credit for what and what "brand label" of thinking is out there. Capitalist, socialist, anarchism, liberal and libertarianism (both from the Latin "Liber" ironically)....all these ideologies are just frameworks of thinking that weak minded people cling to out of their lack of ability to understand the real world.

If it works and makes improvements to our country, I'd expect you to equally 'man up'. But I don't know you and probably won't be here in a year or two from now and therefore don't care. Think what you want dude, but this program is going to be here for a while and you'd be better served learning how to profit from it instead of whining about it all the time. If the gov't can run the mightiest military on earth, I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to allocate payments for pills and whatnot....it's a function of will.

I'll agree with this part for sure: they need to hire some better programmers.

Get busy living
 
UFOinsider:

If they can't fix this, you're right. I'm somewhat confused how the contractors they hired are having such a hard time to build this. However, I see the conceptual part of this as superior to the current arrangment. I see the HC industry approaching the levels of efficiency and cost effectiveness of the auto insurance business with this system. People can oppose this on ideological grounds, but even that baffles me considering these are the same people that liked the system Romney set up. Personally, I'm apolitical and basically interested in ethics and the actual policy more than who gets credit for what and what "brand label" of thinking is out there. Capitalist, socialist, anarchism, liberal and libertarianism (both from the Latin "Liber" ironically)....all these ideologies are just frameworks of thinking that weak minded people cling to out of their lack of ability to understand the real world.

If it works and makes improvements to our country, I'd expect you to equally 'man up'. But I don't know you and probably won't be here in a year or two from now and therefore don't care. Think what you want dude, but this program is going to be here for a while and you'd be better served learning how to profit from it instead of whining about it all the time. If the gov't can run the mightiest military on earth, I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to allocate payments for pills and whatnot....it's a function of will.

I'll agree with this part for sure: they need to hire some better programmers.

You're "apolitical". Right. Maybe I should quote you're far left wing rantings. What I can tell you is that you're disingenuous to the highest order when you say that we supported Romneycare. What we support has ALWAYS been FEDERALISM, that is, the right of sovereign states to be run as they see fit. If the people of Massachusetts want a clusterf*ck of a healthcare system then that's their prerogative.

I don't see how a rational person can read about the absolute nightmare that Obamacare has morphed into in the last 3 1/2 years and say that he believes the new system will be superior to the now-former system. Obamacare was sold as a "net cost savings" at $900 billion over 10 years. That number has morphed into $2.6 trillion. Obamacare promised to be universal healthcare. 30 million people will remain uninsured and as many as 20 million will lose their insurance. Obamacare was supposed to save the average family $2,500 per year. Forbes estimates that it will actually cost the typical family of four $7,400. Obamacare was promised to be an egalitarian system; now it has morphed into a system where Big Business, Big Labor, well connected cronies, and Congress are exempted, often by executive fiat. And I could go on.

Oh yeah, and the thing I like best is how Obama PROMISED that if you like your health insurance you can keep it. Thousands of people (myself included) have received letters saying that if we got our health insurance after March 1, 2010 then we would not be grandfathered in and we would LOSE our insurance! We would have to switch over to an Obama approved plan! It's breathtaking!

 
DCDepository:
disingenuous to the highest order when you say that we supported Romneycare. What we support has ALWAYS been FEDERALISM, that is, the right of sovereign states to be run as they see fit. If the people of Massachusetts want a clusterf*ck of a healthcare system then that's their prerogative.
The level of cognitive dissonance in this statement is staggering. It's not at all disingenuous to say that as a former Republican (as in, I worked for the GOP for years) it blows my mind that people that voted for Romney are against the structure of ACA. That's some Grade-A bullshit dude and you know it. How about take a good long break from the brainwashing and then revisit national and international affairs with a clear mind. Maybe then everything outside the universe of right wing thought won't look so bizzare, you'll actually be able to weigh a thought on its own merits and THINK FOR YOURSELF. There's not just right/left, there's a ton of other ways of seeing things....this ACA is a hybrid state/corporate joint venture. Not sure why half the country has their panties twisted in a bunch, other than they've enslaved themselves to a way of thinking/voting that they haven't really stopped to really think about.

Dude, the shutdown was ALL on the republicans, and barely anyone really thought they'd even do it. It's just all political posturing. If they really gave a damn, maybe consider that because of what they did tapering had to be delayed...that's the GOP's fault. In a year or so the debt will come front and center, even hardcore liberals are starting to worry about it, but in the meantime perhaps consider that you are not seeing things clearly.

Look at it this way: Chris Cristie will most likely be president in a couple of years, and if the kinks aren't worked out on this by then, it will likely be dismantled. In the meantime, it's kind of hard to get anything done when one party basically turns every.freaking.thing into a political football. Honestly, I have yet for you to even address any of what I've ever said directly, you just fly into a rage and start spouting talk show crap. Seriously, I can't even waste time debating you in your current state, let alone communicate any ideas to.

Get busy living
 

My biggest issue is how the Dems and Obama refused to push this off for one year for individuals (as Republicans asked), basically being as pig headed as they were, and shut the government down and pushed the US to the brink. Then the Republicans back down and we are hearing about Democrats and Obama talking about extending deadlines and pushing dates back.

Seeing all the issues with Obamacare I don't think it is unreasonable to give it another year to roll out and work out the kinks...Just as the Republicans wanted. I suppose that wouldn't satisfy political goals though.

So in the end the Dems are just as much, if not more to blame for the whole shut down and debt ceiling crisis. And even worse, this is a program pushed entirely by them, force feed to the public and now it is an epic cluster fuck. Just like most shit involving the government.

 

I really don't see how anyone can honestly say the shut down was all Republicans. I seem to remember the President saying how he wont negotiate. Since both sides have to compromise whatever side refuses to negotiate effectively causes the issue.

And what did Republicans want? Obamacare delayed a year for individuals as it is being delayed for businesses. Seems fair. And what is happening right now? Looks like it is going to be delayed for individuals because it was half assed and rolled out improperly.

Just wait until all the people lose their insurance and see sticker shock when they go to buy insurance. And god forbid them don't buy it. You have people thinking the fine is just $95 bucks. Wait until the 1% of income fine hits their ass.

 

"Even if the Senate had agreed to House demands, President Obama threatened to veto any bill that would delay the Affordable Care Act."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/10/24/democrats-waver-…

I 100% am against any delays at this point. If people don't sign up the get fined, done.

They voted for him. They wanted Obamacare. They got it now they own it. Enjoy getting fined and losing your insurance. Just as everyone said would happen.

Put your faith in the government and this is what happens. Never mind Bengazi, never mind the endless NSA debacle. Never mind the IRS going after political groups. Never mind the ramp up of the IRS auditing small businesses and everyone else as a way to milk every penny from people.

 

I just learned some new information.

From sources inside the company that provided the backbone server management. The initial hardware setup of the servers had a major issue. The techs plugged the fiber line into the wrong port on the internal routers. This essentially caused the system to do a DDOS attack on itself.

Not to mention that the government purchased piss poor equipment and had to repurchase quality hardware.

Oh one more thing, they had no back-up at all. As in they didn't think it was necessary.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

Et necessitatibus reiciendis unde rerum. Nobis possimus asperiores consequatur alias nisi libero. Magnam quae veniam ipsa et sit fugiat culpa sed. Vitae nesciunt temporibus necessitatibus aliquid consectetur vero. Saepe beatae qui fugit autem ullam tenetur eum. Aspernatur ut soluta et et non impedit.

Modi laborum voluptatem iusto ab est id sequi. Consequuntur dicta eum alias pariatur aspernatur quo. Amet voluptas sunt ad est ab quis.

Architecto voluptate et iusto voluptatem perspiciatis enim dolores. Dignissimos necessitatibus mollitia consectetur earum. Aspernatur culpa eius pariatur omnis vel recusandae. Officiis incidunt non quae est.

Voluptatem quia corporis aut nobis illum est. Veritatis asperiores ullam reiciendis voluptatem. Vel est sequi corrupti est repudiandae. Asperiores est iusto rerum suscipit harum.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

Placeat sint delectus sint maiores molestiae et. Dignissimos ut non aut minima et odit dolorum.

Eum doloribus nam commodi mollitia aut a nihil. Doloremque consequatur aspernatur doloremque est voluptas repellendus dolorum. Deserunt et omnis repellat qui. Occaecati ipsa commodi saepe voluptas aut. Quod iste id ex unde.

Ut cupiditate error excepturi reiciendis animi nisi. Ex impedit dolorem culpa suscipit ea. Qui rem qui molestiae. Aut quasi eum unde nemo. Labore laboriosam quisquam qui rerum eum quis id placeat. Cupiditate dignissimos assumenda id animi delectus sit.

Rerum culpa sint veritatis dolore. Qui nemo ut ex ducimus. Et quaerat rem soluta ut magnam itaque.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”