HireVue good or bad for recruiting?
Does talking to a camera really asses a candidate's ability to succeed in a role and interact with others? Would love to hear everyone's thoughts from both an applicant and recruiting perspective.
Does talking to a camera really asses a candidate's ability to succeed in a role and interact with others? Would love to hear everyone's thoughts from both an applicant and recruiting perspective.
+119 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 29 | 3m | |
+70 | Best IB group on the Street | 34 | 23m | |
+66 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 18h | |
+58 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 18h | |
+48 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 23 | 10h | |
+38 | BEING WHITEGIRL IS PARADISE | 11 | 35m | |
+36 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 1d | |
+35 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 3d | |
+33 | Highest Paid Bankers in Toronto? | 51 | 15h | |
+29 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 13 | 1h |
Career Resources
Not necessarily but the advantage of HireVue is that it allows firms to interview more candidates rather than just ivy/target school kids.
Right, but doesn't it reduce the quality of the interviews? I agree it is good that it allows a larger portion of the applicant pool to be reviewed further but it seems like there is a lot of weight on the hirevues
Definitely agree here as someone who graduated from a non-target. In regards to OP, I also feel as if I can convey myself better through a recording versus a 15-minute phone interview. I may have a bad connection over the phone and I also think the interviewer being able to see you helps establish a greater connection.
I'm from a non-target too and I think HireVues are great when they are looked at as a virtual cover letter along with your resume, but I do not feel as though they should be replacing first round interviews. Not having the opportunity to answer follow up questions doesnt allow me to showcase my level of thinking
I think Hirevues are bad for recruiting. Some people are great on camera but terrible in person, and some are the opposite. Are you ever going to be talking to a camera in an IBD role?
Also, I like being able to establish a connection with my interviewer. Chat a little bit, make it feel less forced and more comfortable, and then you also learn more about the bank (by asking questions). Personally, my success rate is far better with phone interviews than Hirevues.
That being said, it makes sense on the employer end. They interview more kids and it takes way less time, it’s all completely standardized, etc, but I hate it as an applicant.
absolutely...i've been on the observation side of hirevue...you can tell a lot about a person...intelligence etc...after watching a lot of them you start to see behavioral patterns...if you are lying or trying to cover up and not be honest, etc...
Ipsam qui aut quo sit dolore. Vitae quaerat sint earum distinctio.
Est quia ab asperiores dolorem ab. Qui qui placeat commodi non reprehenderit debitis. Velit harum eius recusandae totam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...