Understanding Markets and Economies

Hey WSO,

I'm interested in learning how financial markets and the overall economy work together. For example, I'd like to better understand the fundamentals of all markets and their relation to the overall economy.

I have been trying to gain an intuitive understanding of how economies work, but there are too many books to choose from and many don't seem to talk about the interconnectedness of all markets in an economy.

I have read some of Ray Dalio's "How The Economic Machine Works," its main point is debt cycles and I have become familiar with his thought process. Essentially, I want to start thinking like a hedge fund manager, being able to understand securities and their relations to the overall economy.

Are there any books or articles, that are great starters for someone trying to get familiar with all aspects of the economy. For example, books on debt, stock market, how markets function in general, commodity markets, economy's main driving points and their relation to investing.

Thanks for any feedback and considerations.

  • Al
 
Best Response

Hi GTBAHFM,

While not a book, I recommend bookmarking PIMCO Insights and check in every now and then.

https://www.pimco.com/insights

PIMCO is known for developing rigorous macro views, and its PMs publish their thoughts on economic drivers and their effects on the markets.

Howard Marks at Oaktree is also an avid blogger, and you can find his materials at:

https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/howard-marks-memos

Kelvin

 
Kelvin Jiang:

Hi GTBAHFM,

While not a book, I recommend bookmarking PIMCO Insights and check in every now and then.
https://www.pimco.com/insights

PIMCO is known for developing rigorous macro views, and its PMs publish their thoughts on economic drivers and their effects on the markets.

Howard Marks at Oaktree is also an avid blogger, and you can find his materials at:
https://www.oaktreecapital.com/insights/howard-mar...

Kelvin

Howard Marks' memos are excellent.

 

Here's what I would recommend, just dive in. Read everything you can find, nothing is 'bad' at this point. To start thinking like folks in the markets, you need to fully immerse yourself in them. I could give you a bunch of recommendations, but I don't think that is particularly helpful in this case. Read white papers from all the major banks, think tanks, etc. Most importantly, however, watch the markets. Read the news and always be thinking in relation to what is going on. There is literally no source, white paper or news story that you shouldn't be reading.

Here's one recommendation I will give you: Read older finance books and books about financial history. There is one called lord's of finance, for example, which gives you a great perspective on central banking throughout the early 20th century.

 

Thanks it's a goal of mine to read everyday for a couple hours. I've purchased the Lord's of Finance and am reading it.

Do you know of any white papers that are great introductions into the concepts of supply and demand, inflation, deflation, credit cycles, monetary and fiscal policies? I feel like these are sort of the top macro concepts that guide the overall direction on markets.

-Alex

 

Read "The Next Decade". It sums up the last few years and frames them in the context of how the general trajectory of the next decade or so looks. For the larger geopolitical overview, you only need a couple of books given the major powers have already baked in a certain amount of decision making. Start with "The Grand Chessboard".

As for the recession itself, everyone is trying to wrap their heads around it and although I follow it obsessively I haven't found a concise resource that sums it all up. I don't think one has even been written and there's still a LOT that isn't really obvious yet.

Get busy living
 

I think your best option is to read economic blogs to really get a variety of view points. The issue macro economists have is they treat macroeconomics like a science by sticking to one ideology to explain why something happened. When it is most likely a combination of their ideologies. I think Ray Dalio's video The Economic Machine very practically covers the crisis and stagnation that followed at a high level. Two blogs worth looking at are marginalrevolution(.com) and themoneyillusion(.com). MarginalRevolution focuses on many different aspects of economics; however the authors are very practical, and cover a lot of the information that you want. Also, the links they provide are often as good as the blog posts.

The second blog, themoneyillusion, is much more focused on US monetary policy. The author is biased towards the fed implementing NGDP targeting. Monetary policy likely will never implement the rule the way the author wants; however he does make some really good points that show how monetary policy contributed to the crisis, and until recently, the stagnant recovery. Also, he does spend a lot of time on China, and is one of the few economists that I have read that is arguing that they will continue to grow rapidly.

If you skim these blogs semi frequently you will have a good idea of what is going on in the economy. Also, they both have search functions tied to past posts that will allow you to see their views on stuff that has happened in the last 3-5 years.

Finally, the professors that write MarginalRevolution do offer free video based economic classes at MRuniversity. These courses break the material down into short videos allowing you to only watch the ones that interest you. They do have classes on The Eurozone Crisis and the American Housing Finance Sector.

 

A BBC documentary released in 3 episodes named The Love Of Money could eventually shed some light on the answers you are looking for. It focuses first on the fall of Lehman Brothers, then on the Macroeconomic context which led to the crisis to conclude with the analysis of how the world's key players battled to avoid the worse.

It is focused around the crisis itself but can provide you with some great insights on the period, some of the very people who had a role in all the covered events are interviewed and I found it to be interesting and a good way to refresh my memories.

Hope it will help you out

 

read:-

the world bank reports,

imf reports,

the economic outlooks,

the Basel 3's impact on the financial world: KPMG and others have analyzed the Basel 3

Reports of the Basel Committee

focus on China: their excess capacity problems since 2005, the interbank assets & related debt & city infrastructure, their interbank rate, the temporary slow down of their exports and expenditure

focus on Japan: Abenomics, deflation and their excess debt and the value of yen

focus on India's gold buying and then capital outflows

the financial crisis, the US dollar, the US mortgage market, Fed's activities

focus on Cyprus

countries trying to switch away from the dollar and the SDRs (Special Drawing Rights)

Commodities such as gold (who was buying, why, how much and for how long: iran, china, india), oil, etc

read Lazard's reports they are usually global in nature and are based on investing

check the CFA webcasts, podcasts

there is no book that can help you summarize all at once but books like The Currency Wars might help

find different articles that cover 2008 - 2013 http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/04/12/the-worst-four-years-of-gdp-growth-in-history-yes-we-should-be-worried/

 

Something that helped me when I got started was and is finviz's news section. It's a news aggregate, brings together reuters/barons/wsj etc. and then you can skim headlines to find articles that pique your interest. It was pretty easy for me to keep track of oil and fed rate progression over the last year with minimal effort. They also incorporate blogger content which I have found informational at times.

 

Let's be real all macroeconomic events in this age are controlled by politics. When you look at the situation in Greece you will realize that even when national governments themselves are faced with economic crisis, there is a larger institution that can significantly alter the way things should have played out. I say study politics first to understand macroeconomics in the 21st century. Economic theory is not fully applicable to market forces; no matter what your professor might tell you.

 
jktecon:
study politics first to understand macroeconomics in the 21st century.
Yes

Market forces will always assert themselves, but the political / cultural overtones will indicate WHERE, WHEN, and HOW MUCH so. Read the Economist to get a general framework of thought

Get busy living
 

If you can take/audit a college class in Intermediate Macroeconomics or any kind of topics class (Asian Econ, European Econ, Financial Market Econ, etc.) that would be best. I think MIT Open Courseware might have some econ classes but they're all really calculus-heavy which is pretty useless for someone wanting to just understand macro events.

Honestly I've found the best thing to do is just keep reading WSJ, Barron's, Economist, etc. and if you want to know how something works, just google it. For example google "Greek Debt Crisis Explained" or "How Credit Default Swaps Work" etc.

I actually have a chart from one of my classes that shows how interest rates and trade deficits affect FX rates...PM me if you want me to send you the chart.

 

I think theres a lot of bad information in this thread so far. The macroeconomic fundamentals are a basis for understanding what politicians SHOULD do. Understanding the implications of actual policies also relies on a solid economic foundation.

Theres certainly an important intersection between politics and macroeconomics but if you're intention is to understand macroeconomics, learn that first, and then learn political implications.

Macroeconomics isn't so easy to get at first (not necessarily a natural way of thinking). You should buy yourself a solid intermediate macroeconomics textbook if you're actually dedicated to learning.

 
jsmort11:
I think theres a lot of bad information in this thread so far. The macroeconomic fundamentals are a basis for understanding what politicians SHOULD do. Understanding the implications of actual policies also relies on a solid economic foundation.

Theres certainly an important intersection between politics and macroeconomics but if you're intention is to understand macroeconomics, learn that first, and then learn political implications.

Macroeconomics isn't so easy to get at first (not necessarily a natural way of thinking). You should buy yourself a solid intermediate macroeconomics textbook if you're actually dedicated to learning.

Sorry I dont quite understand the point of studying what someone should do if they never reach that outcome. All you macro analysts are the guys who are late to the party without a clue. I guess my problem was that I assumed he was looking for market insight. Didn't think this was just about studying an abstract social science that is an afterthought of real decision making.

 

Vague and Meaningless? Are you suggesting that you can use macroeconomic news to take directional positions in the markets? You are in fact late to the party. News travels faster than that magazine you just received this morning. If this gentleman wants to use macro analysis to get a better grasp on market sentiment than the majority, then he needs a divining factor. If you are reading it off of a bloomberg article or the Economist wouldn't you assume someone (the writer's friends, family of people in the story and everyone in six degrees of seperation) might have processed that news already?

His only hope is that he understands politics to such a capacity that he can translate his untimely macroeconomic information into future government action before the market can realise his discoveries.

 
jktecon:
Vague and Meaningless? Are you suggesting that you can use macroeconomic news to take directional positions in the markets? You are in fact late to the party. News travels faster than that magazine you just received this morning. If this gentleman wants to use macro analysis to get a better grasp on market sentiment than the majority, then he needs a divining factor. If you are reading it off of a bloomberg article or the Economist wouldn't you assume someone (the writer's friends, family of people in the story and everyone in six degrees of seperation) might have processed that news already?

His only hope is that he understands politics to such a capacity that he can translate his untimely macroeconomic information into future government action before the market can realise his discoveries.

The same can be said about discounting cash flows, ratio analysis, and any other market forecasting method. If you would like to lecture me on the efficient market hypothesis then I'd like you to know that I also was a senior in high school once. If markets are truly as efficient as you claim, and pure macro analysis is useless, then they market would have already handicapped the potential political ramifications as well. These political events of uncertainly would already be priced into the value of securities making your "divining factor" useless.

You know this forum is going to hell when people suggest learning macroeconomics is useless.

 

IDK why you keep spewing these increasingly negative words, no one ever claimed macroeconomics was useless. The ramifications of forming a market analysis based strictly on macroeconmic theory is, however, pretty ignorant. No one is talking about forecasting methods here to my knowledge. You are talking about news, plain and simple. Information that everyone has access to and forming a conclusion based on what the best outcome you think should happen because you are the brilliant economist hardly seems profitable.

Leave it to the macro guy to make a sweeping generalization about the whole forum based on one post. That's why no one listens to you.

 
GoodBread:
Just because everyone has access to the news doesn't mean it's instantly priced in or the market gets it perfectly right every time. The big moves happen thanks to secular trends and interest rates which direct money flows from very large institutional investors. That's not an instant process by any means.

Agreed. At the same time, the news might have been anticipated and priced in before it's even officially released and hence people start fading the news once it's confirmed. I find trading the concept of trading the news quite difficult to grasp and hence I usually refrain from doing so, although few of my eminent trades have been primarily based on trading the news or the broader market hysteria.

I win here, I win there...
 
jktecon:
Well goodbread don't leave us tempted, how do we use our macro analysis to notice these obvious market inefficiencies. Who do we study, what stories are we looking for to realize when the market hasn't priced the economic news properly.

You have to figure that out on your own. Market "inefficiencies" are never obvious but if you spend time scenario-building and something suddenly seems out of whack you could be on to something. Fading the news like someone mentioned is a good example. With good risk management, you don't even have to be right 50% of the time.

 

Understand IS-LM framework. It will help you discern between demand-led cycles and those caused by balance sheet problems. The latter is closely linked to the mess in Ireland, and Spain.

The best macro text I used (and still use for reference to present day) is by Abel, Bernanke, and Croushore.

Understanding macro setting is very important; it gives you context and ultimately affects asset prices.

Best

Stay curious
 

Ut sequi sunt tempore ab corrupti. Nesciunt dolor eveniet dolorem repudiandae fuga est. Fuga quia possimus quaerat temporibus ut totam et. Cumque vel dolor exercitationem.

Tempora ea maiores quas ad quia rerum eum. Itaque eum repellat aut et ratione. Id voluptates consequuntur ipsam cum dolorem voluptas esse. Corrupti accusantium voluptatem numquam sequi consectetur tenetur. Molestiae dolor sit exercitationem.

Ullam neque aut magni. Non earum quis quo facere.

 

Et porro omnis mollitia eum non atque est. Et laboriosam ad dolorem molestiae rerum aperiam. Quo ea velit molestiae suscipit consequatur itaque.

Dolor saepe distinctio suscipit. Eum at magnam quisquam aut repellat autem ut eum.

Quia debitis mollitia eligendi. Repellendus ea ullam harum soluta doloribus quas nihil. Cupiditate enim ad aspernatur non.

Ut esse quia assumenda est quis. Nesciunt non eaque aspernatur dolor corporis quisquam placeat. Maiores eius minus earum sed aut voluptate. Eligendi consequatur voluptatem omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”