How can manufacturing lead a recovery?

Why is manufacturing booming? In order for manufacturing activity to boom, doesn’t there have to be demand at the end of the supply chain? I’m envisioning a sort of pull-demand model where consumer demand --> retailers sell more goods --> retailers demand additional supply from manufactures --> manufacuring activity.

Where is the demand for manufactured goods coming from? Are stimulus projects really doing that much? And surely it can’t be investment capital goods because businesses won’t invest in this environment…?

Or is my business cycle knowledge way off track?

 

Inventories are rather depleted. Business will spell off their inventories and not replace them. In a slow economy these inventory reserves can last a while, but eventually they will become depleted. Once they are gone businesses have to replace them which fuels manufacturing. Unless the consumer and the economy as a whole starts going again it will be a temporary boom.

ISM is what, like 58 or so.

 
AnthonyD1982:
Inventories are rather depleted. Business will spell off their inventories and not replace them. In a slow economy these inventory reserves can last a while, but eventually they will become depleted. Once they are gone businesses have to replace them which fuels manufacturing. Unless the consumer and the economy as a whole starts going again it will be a temporary boom.

ISM is what, like 58 or so.

So since manufacturers are responding to depletion rather than demand, I wouldn't think they'd make very much inventory....so would I be correct to assume there is not much manufacturing activity in general, albeit more than there was last month (as the ISM measures activity relative to last month, I believe)?

If so, that means that a small amount of manufacturing activity is leading an entire recovery (albeit a temporary one)!?!??!

 

I would also think:

More manufacturing => more hours worked for expanded output => More disposable income

But I'm just guessing.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 
Revsly:
I would also think:

More manufacturing => more hours worked for expanded output => More disposable income

But I'm just guessing.

Your right, but wages haven't increased as much as they should so essentially profit per worker has increase.

More hours work = more overtime, but the money earned in overtime isn't high enough to offset the normal salary of a laid off worker. Additionally, until you see hiring increase people making all that overtime will pretty scared to go out an spend it with the prospects of being laid off waiting for them.

That being said, more hours worked is typically a precursor for hiring. I mean there gets a point where the company bits the bullet and starts hiring temps and then full time workers.

 
AnthonyD1982:
Revsly:
I would also think:

More manufacturing => more hours worked for expanded output => More disposable income

But I'm just guessing.

Your right, but wages haven't increased as much as they should so essentially profit per worker has increase.

More hours work = more overtime, but the money earned in overtime isn't high enough to offset the normal salary of a laid off worker. Additionally, until you see hiring increase people making all that overtime will pretty scared to go out an spend it with the prospects of being laid off waiting for them.

That being said, more hours worked is typically a precursor for hiring. I mean there gets a point where the company bits the bullet and starts hiring temps and then full time workers.

Exactly. The economic logic is sound... its just not happening in my opinion.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

There isn't much of a recovery going on right now. Government spending is keeping things going. Inventories are depleted, workers are producing a lot and working more hours, a precursor to actual hiring. I wouldn't say no one is buying, just a handful of individuals.

Bank lending is still incredibly slow and we need that to increase to see any real increase in activity. Take a look at companies balance sheets right now, they are overflowing with cash. Afraid to spend, but eventually they will have to do something with that money. I don't know if this is a double dip, but it isn't some glorious rebound thats for sure.

If anyone else wants to chime in feel free.

 

My view has always been that we wouldn't see the unemployment rate really come down until we get a substantial increase in the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index. After all, most of the jobs produced in this country are coming from non-manufacturing related activities, and any increase in demand for manufacturing goods will be met by one worker powering a crapload of machines.

ISM NM was around 53 last month, and the Employment Index is slowly creeping back towards 50. It'll be interesting if it's going to be sustainable.

On a similar note, what's up with the Baltic Dry Index? Anyone want to call a local bottom on it, or think we'll see it (shipping) head down further?

 

a lot of this was discussed in today's wsj. one reason is that exports are rising due to a weak dollar, which in turn creates more demand for manufacturing. additionally, as AnthonyD mentioned, inventories are depleted.

Baltic Dry Index is going a little haywire at the moment due to the incoming order of roughly 1400 new tanker-sized ships this year (traditionally there has only been a supply of 240 ships annually). BDI has usually has had very steady supply since ships are so slow to make, and since supply is constant, it has always been a great indicator of worldwide demand. now that there is going to be an influx in supply, the index in bottoming. note, 2009 also predicted a huge influx of new ships, but most were delayed/scrapped and the supply was unaffected, so this year people might be getting their panties ruffled over nothing.

 

Another big challenge to US manufacturing over the long-term could be labor costs. Hard to compete when everything you manufacture can be counterfeited and produced by people making cents on the dollar in other parts of the world. Even when these Asian economies start paying comparable salaries to the developed world, there are a whole host of countries waiting to fill the low-wage manufacturing model as a precursor to becoming an emerging economy. There are already frontier hedge funds in Africa looking at investment opportunities.

We need a United States MBA corps, like JFK's Peace Corps to sit down and work this country's competitive and debt problems out once and for all. We have the best schools in the world but we are not leveraging the talent in a constructive way.

 
Best Response
jonmorris:
Another big challenge to US manufacturing over the long-term could be labor costs. Hard to compete when everything you manufacture can be counterfeited and produced by people making cents on the dollar in other parts of the world. Even when these Asian economies start paying comparable salaries to the developed world, there are a whole host of countries waiting to fill the low-wage manufacturing model as a precursor to becoming an emerging economy. There are already frontier hedge funds in Africa looking at investment opportunities.

We need a United States MBA corps, like JFK's Peace Corps to sit down and work this country's competitive and debt problems out once and for all. We have the best schools in the world but we are not leveraging the talent in a constructive way.

I agree with you in general, but I disagree with the low cost angle. There are many factors that go into a companies decision to move production overseas. Low cost labor is one thing, but when you add in the total cost of doing business in China the labor isn't that cheap. Still cheaper than here, but all things considered, far more expensive than their hourly wage alone.

 

What is the one thing that America has that many countries would die to get their hands on? Besides our military arsenal, we can sell our medical devices. Rich asian countries would pay handsomely to get better health care. In a perfect world, we would be able to profit by making these devices and have enough money to solve the health care problem.

But this is not a perfect world, so why don't we sell more planes, tanks, and ships to our partners Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. They would be better equipped to defend themselves against the attacks of Kim Jong Il and would be helping the American economy so that we can build more planes which will lead to more jobs and therefore a recovery of the markets.

 

Selling advanced military weapons to Taiwan is incredibly tricky since any major sale angers the Chinese. We just recently sold Taiwan a large shipment of military goods which was met with an unusually stern response from the Chinese government.

We do sell a lot of military items as it is to Japan and S.Korea. Unfortunately, military sales are not enough to pull a country out of a recession.

The United States has an incredibly diverse, open and strong economy. The rest of the world is suffering right along with the rest of us. China has been able to maintain their growth through one of the largest government spending initiatives in history which they are currently pulling back. I tend to agree with the "new normal" statement being thrown around. The economy got so hot because of over extension of credit. Now we are reverting to a more normal equilibrium. House prices have been brought back to earth, home ownership percentages have normalized, savings rates have increased, debt continues to be shed from consumer balance sheets. The economy will turn around, but it will look more like it did many years ago rather than 5-6 years ago.

 

Est enim occaecati sunt. Perferendis unde quia laudantium voluptas omnis. Ad magni quam error. Aut illum aperiam similique officia placeat praesentium.

Impedit non minus quibusdam aperiam ut nemo deserunt. Totam voluptatem eaque et debitis tempore quis. Debitis expedita earum laudantium quidem. Consequatur rerum eum a vel. Ea distinctio assumenda ut sint qui.

Odit eos voluptatem ut voluptatum deleniti voluptas. Adipisci ea est sint nisi animi est similique maxime. Omnis dolore nam eaque sit dolorem ut officiis.

Ipsa ipsam omnis ut exercitationem autem quia. Facere aliquam est quia ea blanditiis ut modi atque. Qui aut exercitationem ut quo dolores qui. Voluptatem cum esse quisquam adipisci.

Follow me on insta @FinancialDemigod

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”