How do I do a watefall model for only the sale proceeds, while the operating cash flows are always pro rata?

How do I build a model in which the the operating cash flows are distributed pro rata between LP and GP, but the sale proceeds are distributed based on certain IRR hurdles. I only know how to do a waterfall model for overall levered cash flow, but I don't know how to separate out only the sale price.

Has anyone seen a deal like this before?

Thanks for any help

 

If conceptually this is a struggle for you though, you might need to take a few steps backwards you just may be ahead of yourself. Might want to take a better look at constructing rent rolls, income statements, creating proformas, and all the mechanics of cap rates and discount rates so that you fully understand how you get from top line revenue all the way down to equity cash flow and where the actually building valuation and sales price are coming from. Once you understand all of that I think you would see why people are confused on why you would ask this because you literally answered your own question in the question itself...just separate them out.

 

To be honest I am only just learning how to do waterfall models using Spencer Burton's videos. I don't understand the mechanics well enough to fiddle around too much with the model he did. Although if I saw a model with how it worked for sale proceeds onlyI would understand it. Just trying to learn

 

I'm not saying he uses the AND() function in his waterfall, but I know he uses it when timing certain events. For example, off the top of my head, I know he uses it when calculating development costs. I'm not sure which model of his you're looking at, so I can't reference exact sections.

You can use AND()*FOLLOWING_FORMULA in your model to dictate when the cash flows appear in either the waterfall or the pro rata section.

 
Most Helpful

Agreed with the above that this should be simple, but I remember when I was just learning waterfalls and could see how you could get confused. This is what I would do:

  • Separate out the cash flow and the sales proceeds into two separate lines.
  • Split the cash flow into two pro-rata lines (GP and LP). So if the GP is 20% and the cash flow is $100, they get the full $20 allocated to them
  • Split the sale proceeds pro-rate as well (if sales proceeds are $1000, then GP gets $200 vs LP $800)
  • Apply the entire cash flow allocated to each partner accordingly. This would probably be in the line titled "Preferred return distributed" or "Tier 1 Distributions" where if the cash flow that is split pro-rata ($20 for the GP, $80 for the LP) is less than the required return, the capital account balance will increase and vice versa.
  • For the Sales Proceeds - Use a Min function that should be the minimum of the outstanding capital account less cash flow distributions applied to preferred return for the period, or the total sales proceeds allocated to the partner
  • Your ending capital balance for the first tier should be 0 (assuming the deal performs better than the required return) as it should read Beginning balance + Preferred return for the period - Preferred return paid - sales proceeds applied to the capital balance
  • You should then have excess sales proceeds only to be applied to the next tier. (total cash flow - pref paid - sales proceeds paid = remaining cash to distribute.)

I'm not always the best at explaining, so hopefully that makes sense. I would spend a little more time on understanding waterfalls as this is a pretty simple. The most helpful tip I can give for modeling waterfalls is to break out every calculation (cash flow, refi proceeds, sales proceeds, cash flow applied to preferred return, capital event proceeds applied to preferred return, cash flow used to reduce capital, etc) to make the easier. That way when you have different cash flow events applied differently you can more easily alter the calculations to correspond with the waterfall terms.

 

I think I'm starting to approach something that makes sense. I was able to get the first hurdle done but I have to do the rest of it. Could I send you what I have so far, and you can tell me if this is what you had in mind?

 

Accusantium id dolor repellendus a qui. Qui enim quae consectetur. Nulla reiciendis rerum eum corrupti tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”