Deal experience for resume

I am currently an IB analyst starting to look for buy-side opportunities. I work in the industry group of an MM. Unfortunately, during my time in banking none of the M&A deals I have worked on have closed. As such, all my deal experiences are fairly boring in spaces such as IG credit or equity issuance.

I am wondering, for the sake of applying to the buy-side, would it be better to cite these capital markets deal experience which have closed, or it be better to vaguely write about analysis I have done for M&A assignments that have yet to close? The work on M&A deals are obviously much more modelling and analysis intensive which should be more beneficial for buy-side recruiting, but does the fact that the deal didn't close hinder the work and make it not worth talking about? Given that there's limited space on your resume which is better to put?

 
Best Response
chunkylover53:

I am currently an IB analyst starting to look for buy-side opportunities. I work in the industry group of an MM. Unfortunately, during my time in banking none of the M&A deals I have worked on have closed. As such, all my deal experiences are fairly boring in spaces such as IG credit or equity issuance.

I am wondering, for the sake of applying to the buy-side, would it be better to cite these capital markets deal experience which have closed, or it be better to vaguely write about analysis I have done for M&A assignments that have yet to close? The work on M&A deals are obviously much more modelling and analysis intensive which should be more beneficial for buy-side recruiting, but does the fact that the deal didn't close hinder the work and make it not worth talking about? Given that there's limited space on your resume which is better to put?

I'm only in IB, so PE guys may have a better feel, but I would write about the M&A experience, since that is most relevant. Even if the transaction didn't close, you can still talk about what role you had in the process and provide high-level details. If you can't mention the firms by name, just use "$500mm Technology Firm) or something to that effect.

At my prior bank, I had a similar issue, but still learned plenty in the process. So long as you demonstrate you understand the process and the perspective (i.e. you ran several LBOs an assessed IRRs based on X,Y,Z), I think you will have a shot for MM PE firms.

Just my thoughts.

 

I agree with peinvestor2012. It is not uncommon for analysts to write about deals that haven't closed. Usually they write "Pending" or "Deal Pulled at LOI Phase" and then proceed to describe their work on the deal. The folks that handle recruiting for junior PE roles understand that an analyst can gain highly relevant experience from busted deals. In fact, most first year MM M&A analysts only have 1-2 deals closed by the time they are recruiting for PE anyways. Some don't even have that (depending on the year --- many had zero circa 2009).

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Comp... how would you go about structuring that into a sentence? I haven't updated my resume in a while, but for transactions that didn't go through, I don't go into quite as much detailed as "Deal Pulled in LOI Phase".

For instance, I'd put down something like, "Served as buy side advisor for $XXX million IT company in its leveraged acquisition bid to take XYZ Co. private". Do you think it is beneficial to add where the transaction stalled (in this case, our confirmatory due diligence caused our client to drop its offering price and the seller went with a different bidder)?

I just don't want to go overboard with detail on the resume, so it gives me some depth to discuss in future interviews.

 

Disclaimer: I am in UG and am heading into my first IBD SA gig this December (I'm from the S.hemisphere), so this question will be naive.

If you can't name companies when describing your work on deals that didn't close, what's to stop someone from making stuff up? How do buy-side interviewers/HR verify your claims?

 
notthehospitalER:

Disclaimer: I am in UG and am heading into my first IBD SA gig this December (I'm from the S.hemisphere), so this question will be naive.

If you can't name companies when describing your work on deals that didn't close, what's to stop someone from making stuff up? How do buy-side interviewers/HR verify your claims?

Hypothetically, if you created enough detail behind the situation, you could make something up. But, it would be a highly risky maneuver, since the interviewer could ask several relevant questions that you may need to answer on the fly.

Once you actually go through a deal process, you quickly understand how detailed things become and how many little pieces of information there are. I suppose it has probably happened before, but I wouldn't dare try it.

Embellishing one's role in a process is much more common.

 

I worked at a boutique IB this summer, and I'm not sure how detailed I can get into my deals because we worked with lower MM clients. Would you happen to know where I could find some "deal templates" so I could structure my resume in preparation? (Basically, I don't know how much detail I'd have to know...)

Thanks in advance, that was super helpful.

 
peinvestor2012:
notthehospitalER:

Disclaimer: I am in UG and am heading into my first IBD SA gig this December (I'm from the S.hemisphere), so this question will be naive.

If you can't name companies when describing your work on deals that didn't close, what's to stop someone from making stuff up? How do buy-side interviewers/HR verify your claims?

Hypothetically, if you created enough detail behind the situation, you could make something up. But, it would be a highly risky maneuver, since the interviewer could ask several relevant questions that you may need to answer on the fly.

Once you actually go through a deal process, you quickly understand how detailed things become and how many little pieces of information there are. I suppose it has probably happened before, but I wouldn't dare try it.

Embellishing one's role in a process is much more common.

Thanks, very informative.

 
peinvestor2012:

Comp... how would you go about structuring that into a sentence? I haven't updated my resume in a while, but for transactions that didn't go through, I don't go into quite as much detailed as "Deal Pulled in LOI Phase".

For instance, I'd put down something like, "Served as buy side advisor for $XXX million IT company in its leveraged acquisition bid to take XYZ Co. private". Do you think it is beneficial to add where the transaction stalled (in this case, our confirmatory due diligence caused our client to drop its offering price and the seller went with a different bidder)?

I just don't want to go overboard with detail on the resume, so it gives me some depth to discuss in future interviews.

Completely depends on how your resume has been laid out. Frequently I'll see analysts list the deal as the main bullet and then describe their role in the deal in a couple of sub bullets. When it is done this way, you can simply put in parenthesis the status of the deal. For example:

Project Falcon - Sell-side advisory to ~$500mm Equipment Manufacturer (Deal Pulled in LOI Phase) -Sub bullet 1 -Sub bullet 2
Obviously there are many ways to do it. As an investment banking analyst I'm sure you'll find a way to make the content flow.
CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

I've typically seen bullets such as: - Advised Acquisition Corp on the $5.0Bn acquisition of Target Corp (Announce date)

If deal is not announced, but is substantially progressed, I've seen resumes with the company names obfuscated but with enough details to give jist ("A large consumer products company"). NEVER give enough detail to betray confidences. Heard of an interview once where the interviewer said "You know there is only one company that fits that description, right?"

Also do not disclose anything that is not publically disclosed (most common: undisclosed deal value).

If you're junior, just include selected transactions. If you're senior (officer level, VP+) you can probably put an add on deal sheet.

 

Pretty sure it wouldn't be a problem if you did 1 and 2, just don't have any names and make sure you can talk about every detail.

For 3, just format it so that it is within the section that you've set aside for that position.

4 might be a little tricky. You can definitely mention it during the interview, but I would personally leave it off.

 

Thanks for your reply. I was really hoping to add the AUM to my resume b/c i feel like there are so many people who work at PE shops with less than $100 M in AUM (there is nothing wrong with that) , and the fund I worked at has more than 1 Billion AUM. I think this will look good when people are looking through resumes but I wanted to know if there was a way to do it without looking like a douche.

 

I start with a main bullet that sums up fund size, strategy you worked on, type of work done (modelling, DD, valuation, bankruptcy) and how that fits with general fund strategy (mezz at a PE firm is different than mezz at a cross-cap HF) subbullets for the transactions, deal that closed first, for the shit that didn't pan out say why (sponsor advanced to final round of bidding but lost or needed warrants that they didn't want to give to hit target IRR). That will create interesting conversations around what sounds like a strong experience.

AUM does not make you a douche. It makes you credible. As a student you lack credibility - this goes a long way toward resolving that. Being a douche makes you a douche. If you are kind of person who worried about this, you probably aren't one. Brush up on deal details, you need to be able to tell the story (but not numbers) of each investment as well as you did the first time you read the CIM.

 

Vel rerum rerum id odit autem et amet. Id laboriosam debitis magnam dolor sequi labore ut modi.

Ad hic eos totam consequuntur. Perspiciatis nam consequuntur iusto hic et ut neque. Voluptatibus dolores ullam id facere reprehenderit.

Quidem adipisci et magnam non reiciendis. Qui et et sunt sit accusamus. Quos blanditiis dolorum et nobis quia nihil nemo. Labore tenetur nemo cumque aut pariatur fuga.

Aut hic nesciunt ut sed inventore molestiae. Et neque voluptas adipisci atque pariatur quia modi. Voluptatem et vel occaecati a rerum rerum occaecati.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”