How do you pick a multiple in DCF terminal value calculation (multiples method)

I am preparing for the interview this week.

I know with the multiples method, you assume that a company will be sold for a certain multiple at the end of your projection period (let's say it is 5.

You take the company's projected EBITDA at Year 5. I know you would look at public comps. Do you look at the current multiples of comparable companies or do you project the 5th year's multiple for the comps?

Hope anyone could help me.

 

I've never seen levered free cash flow DCF in any valuation model, not sure why you would take this approach versus traditional unlevered fcf and take into account the impact of leverage in the discount rate. If you want to piece meal the equity and the debt, you could do the APV valuation DCF methodology which I think is more accepted on the street, well at least taught in b-school. And yes, you would have to use a p/e ratio that is sensitive to the cap structure of your comps, further diluting your analysis unless you had a sold p/e. You can also use the GGM for equity since it's essentially what was used to value equity to begin with in perpetuity.

 

Typically if your comps don't have similar enough (enough being the key word here) fundamental business risk, then you must not have selected the right set of comps. One expects companies in the same industry with a similar product mix to be affected by similar risk factors and thus have an unlevered (asset) beta in a certain range. What kind of company are you valuing? Does it have a highly unique, niche product? If so you might have to look a little harder (or get more creative) in your comp set selection.

But to answer your original question, yes I think it would be a bit odd theoretically speaking to use the average EBITDA multiple for terminal value if your claim is that your company has fundamentally different business risk from its comps. Remember that multiples are really factors of 3 things - growth, profitability and risk, and so ideally speaking a good comp set should be able to tell you something about both valuation (multiples) and risk (betas).

Now note that business risk is not the same as overall risk of the company. Overall risk is a function of the business risk AND the capital structure (that is why you must relever the target company after you unlever its comps)

 

Everything above is correct. Typically we'll put together comps (prev. trans and market) for the targets peer group, calc the mean, median, max and min to arrive a multiples (usually just use the mean, but always defer to what your senior guys want to use or just use your brain / common sense in a pinch). Usually whatever multiple you take away from that could be you're base multiple for your sensitivities.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

At my bank, we use Capital IQ to develop a list of precedent transactions and public company comparables. From there, we use excel to spread key financials (ie EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, P/E, etc.). We also set up a Min, Max, Median, Mean box that is calculated based all of the multiples the provided. Typically, you then "put a finger in the air" based on the Median/Mean #s and the most comparable companies/transactions and say "OK, the mean is 1.5x EBITDA multiple, but the best comparables are at around 2.0xE EBITDA multiple...OK, lets put down 1.8x!) -- Then you go to the client, show them your analysis and, since they know the industry, will say WOW those #s are HUGE and you say "OK, we will use lower multiples" and they say good! "then you say OK, lets use 1.2X instead! WOOHOO!

 

You're still getting to the same place (EV), so...

My posts will be fraught with grammatical errors since I post from my phone. I will try my best not to post an incoherent babble.
 

Maybe I'm missing something here, but the EBITDA multiple gives you a value estimate that factors in that the profitability metric is before taxes. In other words, if the average/median of other market deals is 8.0x, that means the EV was 8.0x pre-tax, pre-interest, pre-depreciation, and pre-amortization earnings for other companies.

I suppose you could take out taxes, but then the starting point for comparable multiples you would use as a baseline would technically be EBIDA (never heard of using that though).

 

What you are referring to is a "foward EV/EBITDA" multiple which is pretty much never used because it depends entirely on your own inputs. So no, don't use your projected EBITDA for your EV/EBITDA multiple...Use the LTM EBITDA for comparability's sake when you do spread your comps.

You speak in in varying levels of verbosity.You often adopt the typing quirks of others as you find it boring to settle on styles.
 

Eum sit sequi mollitia non eveniet alias. Delectus perferendis alias et et qui et nobis. Reprehenderit et vel reprehenderit fugiat.

Praesentium voluptatem soluta nam incidunt sed quaerat. Dolor voluptas ab voluptas asperiores ab qui. Qui aut assumenda minima est error.

Fugiat aliquid quia non amet quas fuga nihil incidunt. Vel repudiandae voluptatem quaerat iusto placeat odio quaerat. Consequuntur quia enim dolorem dolor sed quod vitae. Et harum est et doloremque est voluptas. A laborum totam qui non.

Pariatur et molestiae nobis architecto quisquam quam. Voluptate dolor nesciunt sit voluptatibus provident qui dolores. Eos sit odio esse ad. Minima eligendi porro sit dolorem. Odio et minus soluta ea quod. Laboriosam iusto ut vitae dolores aut et ipsum ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”