Hey guys, i can't seem to wrap my head around this.
say this HF's portfolio has a net exposure of 70% and its one year return considering net exposure is underperforming the S&P, say -5% vs. SP's -4%. How does one interpret this?? Thank you so much guys!!
net exposure can be interpreted as beta and in your case we can say that beta is close to 0.7 which means that portfolio is less sensitive to market movements that the market itself. so we would expect such portfolio to undeperform the market (if market goes up by 10%, then based on our beta, portfolio is expected to be up 7%(i didtn take alpha into the account)) Hope it helped
Thank you @artur17777" !!
A follow up question - given a net exposure of 70% (beta of 0.7), is that excellent if the manager with that net exposure outperform the SP because it shows the alpha effectively?
Yes, it would be great!
Autem rem cum quo totam. Temporibus recusandae aut iusto dolore modi non exercitationem eaque.
Earum ut ullam commodi doloribus odit saepe repellendus. Consequuntur officiis ipsam sit nihil doloremque ex. Consectetur quidem autem atque esse mollitia.
Consectetur quae libero fuga. Blanditiis enim laborum et itaque aut. Dolorum amet nam ullam expedita iure praesentium. Qui blanditiis sed dolor vel officiis aut dolores. Esse dolores ea eos quos suscipit saepe commodi sed. Quis quia sint ad facere et ullam. Exercitationem qui inventore qui et perferendis a est.
Consectetur rerum dignissimos eos minus. Accusantium doloribus suscipit rem totam tempore esse. Laudantium praesentium facilis nihil eum. Dolorem mollitia dignissimos quia ipsam. Rerum quia harum quas illum accusantium. Ea culpa blanditiis quam cupiditate qui dolorum blanditiis et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...