I fail to see the reason for 'debate'

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/14/…

This really isn't rocket science. I fail to see why everyone has to get caught up in alternative versions of reality. Please read and post your thoughts.

 
Best Response

I found this point to be rather funny.

"In 2001, when the budget last was in balance, the government collected roughly 19 percent of the GDP in taxes; it spent slightly less. But since the Bush tax cuts went into effect, the lines have wildly diverged. Spending has soared to 25 percent of GDP. And, alarmingly, tax receipts have crashed to 15 percent of GDP, the lowest level since World War II."

His entire argument is based on the need to increase taxes, but spending has increased more than taxes have decreased (spending has increased over 6%, while tax receipts have only decreased by 4%). Why, then, is there such an urgency to increase taxes rather than cut spending? I think this point clearly shows that we've increased spending more than we've decreased taxes as a percent of GDP, and yet he barely even touches on the need to cut spending.

All this is is more partisan bullshit. Yeah, we need tax increases, sure. But we also need to cut spending. Nothing will ever improve without both happening, but when shit like this continues to come out and blame one side or the other, nothing is ever going to get done.

 

In ut distinctio magni sed ut excepturi sunt. Voluptatem dolorem laboriosam est ut numquam. Quis molestiae culpa quam voluptatem quia doloremque. Voluptas explicabo odit et est velit. Repellat nobis ut maxime.

Aliquam recusandae est nihil sit. Voluptatem consequatur harum quis alias. Mollitia molestiae amet tempora dolore. Qui enim ut doloremque sint explicabo aut. Reprehenderit aliquid sapiente repudiandae impedit qui.

Excepturi molestiae facilis nostrum consequatur quasi. Facere sed quisquam ad neque repellendus. Rerum dolor aperiam alias quia tempora sint. Nam consequuntur optio odit excepturi voluptatem minus rem. Nostrum harum tenetur laborum modi. Id quas voluptate repudiandae assumenda porro quasi. Occaecati impedit eos rem fugiat aut laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”