http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/stocks-r…
I think that says everything right there buddy....
Trending Content
| +95 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 24 | 2h | |
| +37 | Interviews Are So Fake | 24 | 2h | |
| +33 | 2024 UK Election - Tories finished? | 20 | 13h | |
| +29 | Being Christian in investment banking | 14 | 7h | |
| +26 | Is my boss gaslighting me? | 3 | 6d | |
| +23 | Non-Competes Banned | 15 | 28s | |
| +22 | Ideas for things to do with a free semester before starting ft? | 9 | 1d | |
| +20 | Sabotaging Peers to Get Ahead? | 34 | 3d | |
| +18 | Best NYC neighborhood for single 30M | 12 | 1d | |
| +17 | Moelis has the cutest Analysts? | 4 | 4h |
Career Resources
That number is skewed ever since Al Gore invented the Internet during the Flowers/Lewinsky/Jones Administration . . .
A couple of things:
All spending and tax bills originate in the lower house Not all democratic or republican presidents have had full majorities of their same party in control of the houses of congress for the full period of their presidency Not all macroeconomic trends start or stop based solely on dates of elections and inaugurations
Plus we're creating 250,000 jobs per month on avg I believe, instead of bleeding 750,000 jobs per month. Does supply side economics (trickle down theory) work?
Agree with seabird.
The actual effects of a given policy can take years to emerge. This type of analysis is overly simplified. For example, something that was implemented by a Democratic President during the middle of his term could take years to materialize and could land right in the middle of or in the beginning of a Republican term. Subsequently, any efforts of the Republican President to remedy the poorly implement Democratic policy could also take a few years to become effective.. and by that time a new Democrat President could be in the office benefitting from Republican efforts. There could be a lag of a few years.
A lot of these people writing for Bloomberg are journalists first and finance guys second (some of them are just idiots, like this Bob Drummond guy). I quickly learned not to read into everything that's on there.
Not even a valid arguement. You have to look at the congress make up. The president is just a talking idiot for the most part.
Est harum accusamus laborum provident aliquam sed culpa. Ea perspiciatis quae ut maiores dolorum autem doloremque. Delectus in earum corrupti modi. Illum exercitationem eaque quia impedit ut.
Quo incidunt dolorum explicabo exercitationem nostrum harum occaecati temporibus. Delectus itaque alias asperiores perspiciatis aut. Eum id tenetur exercitationem officiis accusantium laborum.
Tempore voluptatibus cum aut ut earum eius exercitationem similique. Et voluptatem reprehenderit a et non distinctio porro. Maxime odit voluptatum nesciunt. Assumenda non aperiam nisi repudiandae iusto ab qui dolore. Magnam porro quasi et aut eum sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...