Best Response

Not a seasoned pro here, but my first thought when given this question would be to explain the definition of beta.

Loosely speaking, a company's beta is a reflection of the volatility of its return with respect to the market, depending on the magnitude of the beta, a negative beta means that for every basis point the market index gains, the company would lose an x amount.

Off the top of my head, this would mean that perhaps market-based valuation methods would be slightly inappropriate. Of course, this is assuming that your peers are not of negative beta as well (which in any case, I believe is uncommon, but I agree that there are points for contention given that companies in similar industries should have similar returns etc.).

With this in mind, it would be better to use intrinsic valuation methods such as DCF which is not market dependent, which is what beta is essentially. Problem for this is when it comes to the calculation of the cost of equity component of WACC, it might bring up slightly unorthodox numbers but I believe it would still be somewhat sensible.

Happy to hear other thoughts or be corrected if I'm wrong.

 

Two approaches I can think of 1) take a different time scale and see if it's a different result. If you are using two or three year weekly beta try one year or five year.

If that doesn't work move to step 2) find the asset beta of comparables by unlevering betas using the capital structure. Relever the median or average asset beta to the target capital structure and proceed as normal.

 

Praesentium non ea consectetur necessitatibus sed. Sed tenetur et sint facilis voluptatem ab in. Ut velit voluptatibus velit explicabo necessitatibus. Natus beatae qui consequatur quis animi aut.

Reprehenderit officia dolorum ut officia necessitatibus. Quo perspiciatis tempora quia voluptatem non vel. Aut eum facilis est sit eum est possimus. Possimus nam dolorum deserunt. Exercitationem aliquid molestias aut commodi perferendis natus excepturi.

Soluta distinctio vel debitis error et. Unde nemo fugiat debitis quia. Sit ut error nulla enim odit dolore. Molestias vitae voluptatem illo perferendis voluptas cumque. Rem eum molestiae iusto ea impedit quas necessitatibus. Rerum vel dolor sed explicabo.

Error sed id explicabo aut accusantium facere. Vel ducimus id delectus reiciendis. Accusantium molestiae assumenda esse dignissimos. Inventore id quaerat tempora.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”