Best Response

I've worked in both buy and sell side for several years at top tier and BB firms. Wow I can't believe I sat through that. Thank god for Youtube HTML5's 2x speed function.

Ok he starts off really slow and is really annoying... stop telling everyone they "need to realize this" or "need to know this".

As for the content, I gotta say he's mostly right about the problems of the sell side, but I think he way upsells the buy side and trading your own money. Obviously, since he runs a grinder for prop traders and he would love nothing more than to have all these kids sign up with their money and put on 4-6x leverage. Then he can cherry pick the smarter ones and let the bad ones burn out without cost. Wow.

Anyway, he's taken a very very dark view of sell side trading... despite what he's said it IS still possible to get promoted to Director or MD and make the 7 figure (locked up) pay, but yes it's much harder and lower than before. Also I think he comes from liquid FX or Equities markets because there's still lots of sell-side skill in illiquid credit or fixed income products.

On the hedge fund side, his pay #s are for a top tier established fund... and even then they're relatively optimistic these days. He skips over issues with client withdrawals, drawdowns, and the fact that you can be fired very very easily on the buy-side. Underperforming Jr or Sr PMs can be let go in 6 months to 1 or 2 years very easily.

This guy seems to work with the assumption that someone is an unbelievable trader capable of generating 20% returns with low variance every year in their career. Yea great then of course trading your own or at a HF is going to get you better returns.

In the end, I actually agree with him that if you really want to be a trader and take risk these days, you're better off on the buy side. However, if you are 1. not sure about your risk taking abilities 2. not from a target school or not getting noticed by buy-side 3. want to do research/sales/structuring etc then sell-side is still viable.

 
cauchymonkey:

lol although his points about IB made sense, it was pretty funny how he talked up trading one's own money by assuming someone would make 20% returns per year on 5x leverage...no mention that one bad year could wipe out everything with that leverage

Agree, his points about sell-side make sense. His points about buy-side make sense. His points about prop trading are ludicrous. I wonder what he's selling?

 

Yes, it's definitely not what it used to be and he was in the industry back when it was 'the good times' so I guess it's easy for him to put it down nowadays.. Also, the point about being a contractor for two years. I'm pretty sure all grad programs are like that regardless of the industry?

 

So I've only had the patience to watch 2 out of the 5 videos (thank god for 2x speed). He does bring up a few good points, however I think a vast majority of this is with equities (even the graphs he pulls up are for equities). I interned at a FI floor last summer and many of the specifics he mentioned about market making were vastly different. He seems to make the assumption that traders must take a position from the client. At least from what I saw in FI, if a trader doesn't want to take a position from a client, he simply wouldn't do the trade...The only time when we would take it would be if it was a very large and important client or if he had a really good relationship with the salesman. The salesman would then return the favor by pushing the trader's axes hard. so basically most of the positions that they had, they wanted to have. So that greatly reduces the "negative choice portfolio" that this guy loves to talk about.

 

Snore. Pushing his propshop as the only way to trade.

I thought he was funny back with BBCs Million Dollar Trader, but now he's spewing common sense for anyone trading more than 10 times a year. I understand that UG students are impressed by his speech and those are his audience. Not guys with more than a few weeks of work experience.

CNBC sucks "This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
 

I think he brought up some points about the sell side that make sense but he also embellished a lot to try to almost scare the students from taking jobs on the sell side. Granted I don't know much about what the industry was like 12 years ago and am sure today is different but some of his points are flat out wrong. In the first video he says that commissions are down 80% and thus pay is also down 80%. Someone with more experience can correct me if I'm wrong but intuitively if banks downsized and trade the same volumes with less traders (with the help of algos) the commission to pay ratio wouldn't be perfectly correlated.

He also says that there is no skill in equity market making because of algo's which frankly isnt the case because if it was the market makers wouldn't be paid six or seven figures if there was zero skill involved. I get that the pay is lower and that there are less traders on the sell side, but to say that there is absolutely no skill in it is ridiculous.

Just my two cents (and I only watched the first video so he may address these points later)

 

Doloremque laudantium sed officia molestiae ut. Quibusdam illum consequatur exercitationem modi. Et in et unde soluta animi nobis. Enim earum odit facilis ad. Ut eos corporis nulla sit nobis aut.

Id quisquam necessitatibus tempora omnis totam omnis. Voluptate dolore ut magni aut esse iusto. Hic corrupti reprehenderit praesentium.

Maxime laudantium voluptatem vero hic. Hic nesciunt autem dignissimos temporibus. Et voluptas est dolorem illo vel vero officia rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”