If all you had for a given company is its revenues, would you feel more comfortable applying industry gross margins or industry EBITDA margins to try and GUESStimate that company's operating profitability? My hunch, is that gross margins are more stable than EBITDA margins. Hence, a guesstimate of gross profit would be more reliable than an guesstimate of EBITDA using industry averages. Is that correct?
Trending Content
| +169 | The "Not So Obvious" things that get you a return offer? | 20 | 2h | |
| +101 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 25 | 1h | |
| +65 | Best IB group on the Street | 27 | 3h | |
| +56 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 4h | |
| +49 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 5h | |
| +46 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 22 | 7h | |
| +36 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 1d | |
| +35 | Georgetown Placement for 2024 and 2025 | 21 | 6d | |
| +34 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 3d | |
| +33 | Highest Paid Bankers in Toronto? | 51 | 3h |
Career Resources
since you want operating profitability, wouldn't it be better to use ebitda since it accounts for all costs of the business instead of gross which accounts only for cogs? I may be wrong, but the structures would be varying from one firm to another. So wouldn't ebitda margin be better for operating profitability since it shows a company's performance without accounting its structure? feel free to correct me if I'm wrong
Some companies could differ in their cost determination method (while one can consider a certain expenditure a cost, other could account it as an administrative expense), therefore, leading to different gross margins in the same industry. To avoid this, I would certainly look for EBITDA margins.
Apologies, I think I phrased my question incorrectly. Say if we realigned everyone's cost determination method to the same rule. Empirically, which measure is more volatile across companies within a given indistry, gross margins or EBITDA margins?
In this case, I would say that EBITDA margins are more volatile. Companies can have different sales structures (wholesale, distribution, etc.), administrative structures, and therefore different SG&A expense ratios as % of revenues. I have seen one case that illustrates this and is related to pharma companies: one global pharma company acquiring part of a small lab's portfolio, and the key metrics used for analysis were gross margins by product.
I'd imagine that this depends on the industry you're looking at. Specifically if the typical cost structure is more variable cost (eg consumer products/wholesale & distribution) or fixed cost (eg airlines/logistics) driven.
Eos praesentium earum rerum in quos ab adipisci. Omnis quia ratione unde quam deleniti delectus recusandae est. Qui dolorum magnam ut doloremque. Beatae maxime est quia cumque consequatur consectetur id. Mollitia occaecati rerum aut soluta itaque. Et deleniti voluptas eaque voluptatem.
Sint quo accusantium reprehenderit. Rerum non quis doloremque sit alias. Sit et laborum quis odio doloremque voluptatem non. Similique quisquam error deleniti qui dicta ut deleniti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...