Not uncommon for bankers to also do angel investing or accept part of a prior fee in equity. Can’t recall seeing an explicit disclosure outside of some very fine print. Not sure how that the banker having an equity stake disadvantages a buyer except in a purely hypothetical sense.
You’re worried that they own some of the business, so they’ll act in their own best interest and paint the company in a good light so they get the highest price… as opposed to a banker who gets paid on transaction value and will act in their client’s interest and paint the company in a good light so they get the highest price?
Agree that it’s not unheard of, I’ve received deals from major banks where the senior banker had an equity interest in the deal
That is odd. I remember hearing about BDs disclosing relationships / having restrictions when it comes to marketing a company they have an interest in, but never really understood / explored why. Perhaps it has something to do with having an ER team and needing to set certain firewalls? I don’t really think that’s the case, rather there’s some giant work around as it sounds pretty odd to have a law that says “you can’t sell what you own” to a freaking bank.
Nam officia delectus porro sequi laudantium. Deleniti assumenda culpa voluptatem error est odio. Similique quis amet esse nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Very common situation. Wouldn’t overthink it.
Dhcuhehxhxhdujsnxndjwiwiisieieieeidujcjcjejjejeww8djjdjdjdjdjdjjdjdjxjxjdjxjjdjxjdjdjjdjdjdjdjjdjdjdjdjdwss
Not uncommon for bankers to also do angel investing or accept part of a prior fee in equity. Can’t recall seeing an explicit disclosure outside of some very fine print. Not sure how that the banker having an equity stake disadvantages a buyer except in a purely hypothetical sense.
I’m trying to figure out what the conflict is.
You’re worried that they own some of the business, so they’ll act in their own best interest and paint the company in a good light so they get the highest price… as opposed to a banker who gets paid on transaction value and will act in their client’s interest and paint the company in a good light so they get the highest price?
Agree that it’s not unheard of, I’ve received deals from major banks where the senior banker had an equity interest in the deal
.Dhcuhehxhxhdujsnxndjwiwiisieieieeidujcjcjejjejeww8djjdjdjdjdjdjjdjdjxjxjdjxjjdjxjdjdjjdjdjdjdjjdjdjdjdjd
That is odd. I remember hearing about BDs disclosing relationships / having restrictions when it comes to marketing a company they have an interest in, but never really understood / explored why. Perhaps it has something to do with having an ER team and needing to set certain firewalls? I don’t really think that’s the case, rather there’s some giant work around as it sounds pretty odd to have a law that says “you can’t sell what you own” to a freaking bank.
Following for answers and corrections
Nam officia delectus porro sequi laudantium. Deleniti assumenda culpa voluptatem error est odio. Similique quis amet esse nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...