Integrated Reasoning Help - GMAT - What is Wrong?

Has anyone who has studied for the GMAT found the Integrated Reasoning portion hard?

I've consistently scored 700-750 on the past 4 MGMAT practice tests (75-80% Q, 90-95%V) but in the 2 tests that I've tried out the integrated reasoning portion, I can't get higher than a 3-4.... I'm always pressed for time and seems like even when I think I answered the questions right, I did not.

Does anyone have any tips? I take the test very, very soon and am getting quite concerned over the IR portion.

Thanks in advance for all comments.

 

To be fair, MGMAT tests are not that accurate from my experience. The quant is definitely a bit harder than the actual but not sure about IR. I think the key to IR is just being able to look at data quickly the first time around to get a feel for what's going on and then being able to quickly go back to answer the questions. Also if you're good at basic deductive reasoning you'll do well. Don't really have advice to be honest. I didn't study IR at all when I was preparing for the GMAT.

 

Took the GMAT a month ago. I found that IR to be really, really easy -- much easier than MGMAT. Never got even close to an 8 on the MGMAT preptests, but got an 8 on the real thing, if that helps.

Honestly, dont worry about it. When you're actually taking it on the test, even with only a 70% focus as youre already thinking about the Quant section, you're going to find it very easy if you just give it some effort.

 

The MGMAT Scoring for the IR section is flawed. If you got them all right you'd end up with like a 3.9, or at least that was they way it was 6 months ago.

I'm certian I missed 4 questions on the actual test and I eneded up with a 8. I think the section was much easier on the real test. It's not computer adaptive, so you'll get the same questions that someone targeting a 500 score will recieve. Just remember to pace yourself, as they will drop 1-2 tough questions.

 

I dramatically increased my performance on the IR section by simply skipping the really tough ones. It seems like GMAC wants you to burn time on one or two extremely complicated questions which, in turn, leaves you short on time for the manageable ones. I ended up with a 6 on the real thing with this approach which isn't too bad (had like 5 mins to spare at the end).

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 
Best Response

I saw one of the guys from Kaplan come out and basically say there's no reason for you to wait to take it and should definitely take it before the new section if you can. The reason is because it will take more time studying for the new section to achieve the SAME score on the old test (since you have to spend more time preparing for a whole new section). Therefore by taking it before the update comes, you essentially get extra points for taking it before the update comes.

If you spend x hours on old=680 if you spend x hours on new=650

to get 680 on new, it will take x+y hours, so it's not worth it because of the excess time required for the SAME score. obviously this is all an approximation, and i have no idea if it will be a 30 point differential, but thats the basic gist.

 

It's NOT included in the 800, you can go to the official GMAT website to prove that. The real consensus is that 1) nobody knows how the score will be perceived, but 2) people GENERALLY think that the schools aren't going to put much weight on it because it's new, and will therefore mostly rely on the Q / V split and aggregate GMAT score as they always have. In other words, take the test when you are ready and don't get your panties in a twist.

 

If you're applying for fall 2013. I would wait.

I was one of the people that tested this section for GMAC (wrote in January) and in my personal opinion this section benefits people in finance, especially those who have done cases (Those who went to case based schools have a leg up). I found it very intuitive and of the 12 questions I had to do at least 4 had graphs (which you should be able to interpret if you're in finance).

 
cinnamontoastcrunch:
Your numerical score will still be determined by quant and verbal.

The integrated reasoning section will be every bit as useless as the AWA score is for your essay.

^^ This, while the 'Integrated Reasoning' is new and you should probably study for it a little bit, it really won't matter unless you basically score a zero which would be akin to writing nothing for your essays. The score is reported separately just like the essays are and just like the essays no one will care about the score unless you basically don't do the entire section. There is no need to rush your prep and take the test if you're not ready, just proceed as usual and spend a few extra days looking at the pointless graphs and paragraphs that are part of the new section.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

I agree with BepBep12 . Take your time and make sure you are fully prepared. Also I believe the IR section will be at the end of the exam - this may help some people as they only have to write one essay prior to Quant and Verbal.

 
madgames:
I agree with BepBep12 . Take your time and make sure you are fully prepared. Also I believe the IR section will be at the end of the exam - this may help some people as they only have to write one essay prior to Quant and Verbal.

^This is correct and all of this can be found on the GMAC website.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

Voluptas nulla autem aut voluptatum unde. Ea itaque cumque est voluptatem et debitis ea consequatur. Earum voluptatibus omnis officia veniam sint amet numquam necessitatibus.

Vel omnis placeat explicabo est. Amet perferendis dignissimos voluptas aperiam rerum. Velit est quas voluptate minima dolorem.

Corporis aut non aut voluptatum. Iure in vel asperiores qui impedit maxime quisquam. Quis et nihil quibusdam excepturi omnis ut. Modi soluta voluptas mollitia rerum perferendis ipsum nihil. Accusantium reiciendis eos vel non nemo provident. Quas quis dolor nam.

Qui provident quo architecto. Minima architecto ut nihil corrupti consequatur consequatur aliquam laudantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”