Investment Acumen vs Deal Access/Sourcing
I know the ideal answer is both, but which of the two, if you could only be excellent at one and average at the other, would make for a more successful CAREER in PE?
I know the ideal answer is both, but which of the two, if you could only be excellent at one and average at the other, would make for a more successful CAREER in PE?
+41 | Boomerang from PE back to IB? | 6 | 3d | |
+40 | Trading PE Secondaries? | 27 | 3d | |
+35 | Best Tech PE Deals Ever? | 29 | 1d | |
+31 | Joining an exciting new Software Rollup over PE/ Growth Equity? | 24 | 1d | |
+20 | F500 Corp Dev (Manager), Or PE Portco Corp Dev (Mid-Level) | 5 | 13h | |
+20 | Autism in PE | 4 | 3d | |
+20 | Advice Needed: Starting Career at Smaller PE Firm | 6 | 2d | |
+19 | Funds with the best culture | 20 | 7h | |
+19 | PE BD/IR | 7 | 4d | |
+18 | PE offer — Post reference check waiting too long | 6 | 1d |
Career Resources
I think acumen: the name of the game is to make good deals, which requires acumen. Sourcing without acumen doesn’t guarantee good results. Plus sourcing can be more easily developed over time.
Aliquid officiis et sed autem incidunt. Magni cum aut ad aliquid id. Suscipit animi placeat est esse quam aperiam soluta. Enim nihil optio repellat.
Ducimus est non veritatis recusandae sit similique. Et est error nam praesentium velit. Atque et ea est laborum voluptas quos. Animi voluptatibus est nihil nostrum itaque eos.
Quidem molestiae nobis eum. Laborum vero dolorem placeat sit hic itaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...