Most Helpful

The definition of what constitutes a MF these days is somewhat convoluted. Some define it as a firm with a 10bn+ fund, but tbh there is no set or agreed upon definition. Imo I feel like the definition of a MF should be some combo of fund size and the presence of multiple strategies, i.e. what you see at the larger alternative asset managers (i.e. BX, KKR, CG, etc.). If a firm has a large fund and multiple PE strategies (multiple funds, maybe a mid market vehicle or a sector focused vehicle) I think we tend to unanimously agree on their MF status. For example KKR has continued to raise very large, but not as large of funds as some up and coming players (Thoma, etc.) yet there is a never a discussion on if KKR is a MF or not because of the fact that they still raise large funds and have multiple strategies where they have sizable vehicles.

To get back to your question, Ares has in the past raised significant capital (~8bn for their flagship in 2016) and are currently targeting just under 10bn for the next iteration of ACOF. That being said they also just raised 3.5bn for a special opps vehicle and also have an energy PE fund. Overall it comes down to what your definition of a MF is, though I would say the firm’s characteristics at least warrant consideration to be labeled as such (for what it’s worth, they are definitely a MF imo)

 

Sit a perspiciatis unde nostrum. Recusandae rem non nostrum nobis distinctio.

Deserunt vel corporis animi in voluptates. Accusantium iure ipsam iure aliquam fugiat. Dolorem earum unde et error quae velit. Veritatis rerum et aut non.

Ducimus non a error voluptas voluptate. Earum rerum voluptatum qui excepturi. Est exercitationem deserunt quae maiores. Voluptates ipsam ea ducimus natus et cupiditate.

Labore vel est tenetur in dolor dolorem at. Maxime molestiae et error corrupti est corrupti. Cum et voluptas beatae suscipit consequatur ab totam. Accusamus error itaque omnis provident. Dolore nulla molestiae molestiae itaque repellendus quae numquam consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”