Is this a normal practice within a fund house?
I just joined a hedge fund and we have this investment challenge game within our team. The game is to play a virtual investment game with hypothetical money. But the payoff, which is determined by our over/under-performance against a particular index (say MSCI APAC ex Japan), instead of the actual returns of our holdings, is real. So for example if my virtual holdings for the month returned 5% while the index returned 3%, I would receive 2% x USD 100 = USD 200 from my boss. I am just wondering if this is a normal or legitimate practice within a fund house. My boss said he got the idea from a retired Goldman Sachs fund manager who used to do this with his team. Thank you.
Is there a penalty if you underperform?
yes it will just be the exact opposite
Hah probably not common, but pretty awesome
Doesn't really sound like that big of a deal. So I don't think it's "normal", but it's also not exceptionally weird.
It's similar to the European quant team at SAC getting together and doing PF Chang's every Saturday night - is that "normal"? No. It's also not really weird. Or a big deal. Or that interesting. Kind of a like this.
Illum iste odio est eaque. Cupiditate omnis voluptatum iure debitis ducimus corrupti. Pariatur dolores quo hic laudantium dolorum. Quae molestiae et eos. Vitae at soluta reiciendis eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...