Is this still considered a LBO?

Is it still considered a LBO if a public corporate acquires another corporate (private) using 100% debt? I know the term LBO is typically used in the context of a sponsor using a significant amount of leverage to acquire a company, but wasn't sure if LBO could also just be used as a highly leveraged transaction, sponsor or no sponsor present.

What are your thoughts?

 
Best Response

No, that is just a merger financed with debt. I get the confusion - LBOs are acquisitions at the end of the day. But keep in mind a few things that distinguish LBOs from other acquisitions:

1. In LBOs the buyer is (usually) a bankruptcy remote LLC shell instead of an actual business. This means that all txn debt is secured by the target’s own assets and the purchase accounting adjustments are based on the target’s standalone balance sheet. This is different than a traditional merger, where you are combining two separate businesses

2. In a LBO the buyer intends to exit the investment after ~5 years and uses return on equity as its main form of analysis (either IRR or MOIC). No synergies are expected (though the sponsor might assume higher margins based on how it plans to run the business).

In a traditional merger, a public company analyzes its returns based on its effect on standalone earnings per share (ie, accretion dilution analysis). This is a GAAP based analysis that typically includes synergies and various merger related accounting charges. Obviously cash flows are much less relevant here than for an LBO where accounting earnings are irrelevant

Tl;dr - public co mergers and LBOs have basic structural differences and use different kinds of analysis

 

Thanks for your input, Draymond. So if I worked on a transaction like this (where we were putting together part of the financing), would it be correct to list something like "$Arranged xxxMM credit facility for an Industrial Co's M&A of a major competitor"?

Also, would it be appropriate to say "arranged" if we technically did not get lead left, but instead were like a joint lead arranger (right)?

 

Wow OK I'm gonna make this very clear and simple:

Public company acquires any company and is still public, that's M&A (NEVER LBO). Crown acquiring Signode below. The 2 companies have combined revenues and increased scale. (PUBLIC COMPANY GOING FWD, no matter what happened prior). LBO is a sponsor buying a company. (PRIVATE COMPANY - Pro Forma, no matter what happened prior. ) Also want to clarify minformation @ $0 synergies comment for LBO. Quite the contrary. They'll often add value and use their industry expertise to drive growth, reduce costs, expand to new markets, and acquire and integrate acquisitions using their proprietary data. Totalprojectcost savings from platform integration Operations: $20m  Process transformation and automation  30% reduction in premises footprint  Back office consolidation (risk, compliance, and operations) Risk platform: $15m  Fraud reduction  Good / Bad rate improvement  Credit loss improvement  Digital Wallet funding enhancement Bank as a service: $20m  Lower fees (acquiring, APM, FX)  Closing of unused accounts  Banking relationship consolidation  Consolidate onto proprietary acquiring licenses

Finally - example of Transaction Experience. The ppl interviewing me were always able to understand what's going on below, using less words and clutter

Transaction Experience • Bumble (Blackstone) | $200MM Revolver / 1.0B Term Loan | LBO (Left-lead) • Crown Holdings (Signode) | $2.0 Term Loan B | M&A (Joint Lead) [Or say Right-lead]

 

Aut quaerat voluptate iure illum nesciunt ipsa. Aperiam ea et doloribus delectus sed et veniam. Aliquid et maxime accusantium sunt non. Aut nam quis et quia earum est suscipit. Voluptatem repudiandae et totam praesentium aperiam voluptas quis itaque. Qui id possimus nemo et.

Iure quam est dolorem earum voluptatem modi illo. Ut quasi officia porro non aut temporibus temporibus. Cupiditate voluptas id fuga. Ea ex saepe recusandae provident. Nesciunt dolorem sed veniam id ipsum. Nobis qui fuga et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”