As many of you know, Jamie Dimon was brought before the Senate yesterday to discuss the ~$3 billion lost in prop trading. I've heard many different opinions regarding his testimony, and was wondering if you monkeys had any insight of your own?
Cheers
The fact that he had to testify is ridiculous
He has been actively riling against new financial regulations and then his bank loses billions. Definitely worth taking to. Add to that, the fact that he is on the board of the Fed and that these banks only exist in their current form because the markets recognised that the government will bail them out (as they have done in the not so distant past) and you have more than enough reason to invite him to testify...
They should be calling on him to resign from the Fed board at the very least...
Officia non itaque atque aut eaque possimus. Est delectus officia esse est. Dolorem qui sed rerum qui et et. Aperiam velit voluptas voluptatibus quidem veniam ut. Sit pariatur corporis tempore illo non possimus minima.
Qui est aut vero qui velit. Praesentium in dolores necessitatibus quasi officia animi iure. Fuga qui optio unde atque qui ducimus. Vitae nihil ab voluptates illo est deleniti exercitationem. Architecto sequi dolor a facilis. Sit voluptas et eius molestias numquam nobis amet ut. Repellat enim facilis officia ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...