LBO - Model Test - Questions


Have a few LBO modelling tests coming up and have been preparing in advance.

One area that I am confused about is Preference Shares / Loan Notes. All of the model guides that I have seen all assume that the PEH invests only in ordinary shares (i.e. their return is just closing equity / opening equity). Is there a reason for this? From what I understand, in practice almost all deals are structured so the PEH has a preferred return using pref shares / loan notes. Should I be modelling this out in any case studies that I do, or is it over complicating it?

Secondly, this is a bit basic but I am confused with how ownership works with preferences shares / loan notes. Are preference shares / loan notes the same thing? Do they count towards my ownership % on exit?

E.g. If I have a 1,000 equity value on entry financed 900 PEH loan note, 50 ordinary PEH, 50 ordinary management. What is my ownership % on exit? Is it 50% or 95%?

Really appreciate any tips. Thanks.

Private Equity Interview Course

  • 2,447 questions - 203 PE funds. Crowdsourced from 750k+ members
  • 9 Detailed LBO Modeling Tests and 15+ hours of video solutions.
  • Trusted by over 1,000 aspiring private equity professionals just like you.

Comments (11)

  • Analyst 2 in IB - Cov
Jan 22, 2021 - 7:32am

From European Perspective:

- PEH (or SHL) grows by PIK (e.g. 10% p.a.), at the end at exit this 100% goes to the Sponsor

- After deduction of SHL from the "total equity value" (meaning exit multiple x EBITDA - net debt); Common equity is left. This is dividend according to initial investments into the common equity of the Sources & Uses. If split was 50:50; then 50 to management, 50 to Sponsor.

  • Analyst 3+ in IB-M&A
Jan 22, 2021 - 7:45am

Thanks. Super helpful. A couple of follow up qs:

(I) how is the common equity split determined? I.e. if on entry it is 900 SHL, 50 PEH Ords, 50 Mgmt Ords, that seems like a very unfair split on PEH (contributing 95%, but only getting 50% of equity upside)? Does it get adjusted to take this into account? I.e. SHL 900, PEH 90 Ords, Mgmt 10 Ords? - This still gives Mgmt an outsized equity amount for their investment (even ignoring any sweet equity / MIP)

(II) How should this be presented in an LBO test? As I said, all the materials I have reviewed have assumed PEH invests only in Ordinary equity. Is there a reason for that? Is it expected to model out the SHL in an LBO case study?


Learn More

300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.

Learn more
  • Analyst 2 in IB - Cov
Jan 22, 2021 - 7:49am


(I) It depends on a reasonable amount that management can afford right? Usually, what I have seen, 85% SHL, 15% CE, 80/20 split Sponsor and Mgmt; which results in a couple of million for management (reasonable amount to rollover)

(II) I have, with one exception (US MF in Continental Europe), not seen modeling test incorporating these features; but rather just doing common equity; also due to timing reasons in a 1-2 h test. Would only model this in if explicitly asked - not a real value add but the potential to f*** up in a timed scenario.

  • Analyst 1 in IB - Gen
Jan 22, 2021 - 11:43am

Do you know why firms actually do SHL? Is it for tax purposes? They'd get wiped out anyways in pretty much all cases if going bankrupt 

  • Analyst 2 in IB - Cov
Jan 22, 2021 - 11:48am

Tax reasons, correct! PIK interest is tax-deductible (depends of course on the country etc.) And as outlined above as multiplier for management returns / incentivisation

  • Analyst 3+ in IB-M&A
Jan 22, 2021 - 12:35pm

Thank you again! 

Just on the case study / test element - is it not a bit weird to not include it? Seems an integral part of the transaction structure & how returns are generated and odd to not include on that basis. Would it get extra credit if it was included as part of an assessment?

Another point - does management rollover not often take a similar structure ("Mgmt loan notes"?). Whereby your structure may be something like this:

Entry: 1,000

PEH Loan Notes: 950

Mgmt Loan Notes: 45

PEH Ords: 4

Mgmt Ords: 1

Just trying to reconcile what I hear in real life around structuring & have read vs. What is presented typically in models / modelling guides.

Jun 3, 2021 - 6:35am

Necessitatibus et illo qui nisi qui voluptas asperiores fuga. Omnis qui illo nisi est nobis doloremque nemo.

Et veritatis voluptas non et fugiat ab incidunt nulla. Autem natus laboriosam velit occaecati rerum non.

Harum veritatis amet libero minima ut. Fugiat dolorem quia ut tenetur dolore molestiae voluptatem. Quibusdam mollitia nam impedit quidem eos pariatur ducimus.

Nam nihil quia voluptas. Delectus quis sunt velit ut quia atque.

Start Discussion

Total Avg Compensation

September 2021 Private Equity

  • Principal (7) $694
  • Director/MD (18) $575
  • Vice President (68) $367
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (68) $270
  • 2nd Year Associate (139) $254
  • 1st Year Associate (284) $219
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (26) $159
  • 2nd Year Analyst (61) $135
  • 1st Year Analyst (185) $118
  • Intern/Summer Associate (20) $67
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (219) $59