It really depends on the person. One might like getting the deal flow of a larger shop, but doing the 'same' things over and over again as some semblance of "security" where as at the lean shop you're going to be wearing many different hats.

For me, I'd rather go to the lean shop. Learn more, do more things. Pay could potentially be greater with bonuses. Hours are generally better.

make it hard to spot the general by working like a soldier
 

i say large because its more likely that you get a second chance there... no one makes money all the time and plenty of guys blow up (some would say its only a matter time).

i think if you are talented and driven, you can always find a way into a risk taking role... small or large.

 

This question is largely irrelevant. What you should be more focused on is the strategy of the shop and how you think about investing and your PM's track-record. Do you want to be doing equities, distressed, macro, etc.

Then it comes down to the fund's structure / ability to move within. Would argue some places are more 2 and out but not nearly the extent of PE.

Then maybe comes AUM / person but it's so far behind the first 2-3 questions that it's largely irrelevant. And yes, it does feel good to play for Bama. Roll Tide.

 

apologies, did realize that my question was quite vague and not exactly targeted to have a specific answer. wanted to have an open ended type question that would bring about discussion from all different individual experiences.

to be more specific, the lean shop: AUM is small (around $100 million), but the shop is very lean, 1 PM with 1-2 analysts under, invests in equities. the large shop: $2+ billion AUM, but significantly larger shop with multiple PMs and analysts, invests in distressed situations.

my issue: the lean shop seems as though there would be a lot more autonomy, and potential upside in joining, but in doing so, there's also the risk of the fund blowing up much more easily than the larger shop. im open to both investment strategies as they both are in line with my interests.

interested to hear if anyone has been in a similar situation in terms of selecting a fund, and how it's played out for them

 

I am working at a small/lean shop. If both funds have same strategy I believe most important are: AUM and PM/management's ability to raise money.
AUM should be >USD 150m to survive some meager months and to feed all mouths in the company (surely depends on strategy and fee structure, also how many shares have been given away to seed money or other investors/management). PM needs to have an impressive track record and he has to be known among investor. Also, relationships to the sell-side is quite important. The guys on the other side earn big bucks with big shops - small accounts are often not worth the hustle. Also, not every good analyst becomes a good PM and not every good PM becomes a good HF manager. You should be aware that joining a small shop means that you startup/business risk is disproportionate compared to a larger and stable fund. Consider the risk/reward and this should be reflected in your contract when joining a startup fund. In your case, they have different strategies and quite frankly being a distressed analyst is very different to equity. So should think also about which strategy fits best. I personally believe that coming from a big distressed shop after 2-3 year is definitely an advantage vs small equity shop nobody has heard off.

 
Best Response

Rem quos quo rem voluptatum est non saepe ut. Enim consequuntur et voluptate qui sint dignissimos. Laborum rerum ut iste ut suscipit nihil sunt. Harum quod tempore optio fuga quia est dolore.

Provident doloribus provident nemo sed. Ut quis sit ut. Repellat tempore labore fugiat sed quae animi veritatis eos. Autem eligendi porro non optio nam nisi consequatur.

Value investor working in the hedge fund industry. Portfolio Manager, Analyst at a $380+ million Texas-based value investing HF. Former Research Consultant, Analyst at a NYC-Based deep value and special situations HF.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”