LSE vs Cambridge for Post Grad in Finance in Economics

I was recently accepted to LSE's MSc in Finance and Economics and Cambridge's MPhil for F&E--and I'm having a bit of trouble deciding between the two. It seems that LSE has fantastic placement, but I find it hard to believe that having a MPhil from Cambridge would be much different (Cambridge clearly has a stronger overall brand name, but within the financial sector there seems to be less of a disparity in that regard). Moreover, both courses seem fairly theoretical in nature, so I'm not sure if there is too much of a difference academically.

tl;dr Any input would be greatly appreciated.

 

LSE's placement isn't as good as you might think This isn't LSE Econ- it's LSE F/A Cambridge's placement isn't great either, but it's got a little bit more versatility, in the sense that the brand name will help you open more doors to things you might not have thought of applying to before.

Go with the oxbridge

.
 

Take Cambridge and don't look back. Even though LSE is great, Oxbridge opens a lot more doors for you in the UK/Europe and same can be said about financial services. The only reason why you see more LSE students in the City is because many go to LSE with the goal of doing IB or similar. Oxbridge - not so much, so there is a selection bias. When it comes to how targeted these schools are, Cambridge wins over LSE.

 

Also think that especially since you want to go back to the US, Cambridge is the better choice. LSE is a great school, but it's a bit like Harvard and Wharton. Harvard carries the brand and even if Wharton is maybe a more well known name in finance, it pretty much stops there. Though I'd also add that Cambridge will likely be more theoretical than LSE. They went with the MPhil for a reason, I'd say but depending on which profession you aim for that could be no problem at all.

 

Laughable that people think Cambridge has a better placement. Yes it probably does have a better network as its much older and larger, but can someone tell me how they arrived at the conclusion is has better placement?

 

Just to confirm, is there no notion of LSE's program being more established? I'm just a bit concerned that as a postgraduate in a relatively new program at Cambridge, I would not be given the same advantages as an undergraduate student (in terms of how employers perceive my candidacy).

 
Best Response

Depends where you wanna work for and what you wanna do. Personally from LSE, and I can tell you at least at UG there is no difference in UK recruiting. For IB/PE/HF, they don't care as long as you are from oxbridge/LSE. Top HF/PE (BX, TPG, Carlyle etc.) only recruits at Oxbridge and LSE. Honestly i think if you can't land interviews from these 3 schools, it's probably your problem. (I'm an international student BTW, so you shouldn't be worried too much if you are not bad)

While LSE give you the London edge, Oxbridge gives you the experience. Personally I will go for LSE for master, especially the F&E program is the flagship program along with the Finance one. It's a very quantitative course with excellent placement in finance, plus you really do enjoy the EASY networking opportunities in London (and night life). But the Oxbridge brand holds weight in a long run. If you consider to go back to the US, or try to break into consulting, go to Cambridge.

If you really care about prestige, take Cambridge. A good analogy is really harvard vs wharton in NYC.

And YES, the F&E at Cambridge is very new. But your LSE program is one of the toughest to get in (F&E right?). Can't comment too much the Cam one but the LSE one is TOUGH.

 

Fugiat quaerat ab neque ipsam in. Omnis laborum est sit exercitationem laboriosam.

Quae architecto dolorum odit nesciunt et corrupti odio. Aut dicta explicabo animi et. Rem tempora est tempora qui inventore commodi accusamus et. Fugiat non placeat aliquid.

Expedita illo quos optio voluptatem quidem. Cupiditate distinctio reiciendis veritatis ut. Vel ut quae magni corrupti quia. Accusamus sed eius cumque qui quia velit praesentium illo.

Officia eveniet et voluptas. Deleniti ea ea incidunt. Omnis sed necessitatibus ut debitis error dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”