Maximizing risk adjusted returns: sell as valued-add or stabilized?
I'm working at a small developer (value-add - buy office properties, convert to life science, sell) and we typically model our sales post-stabilization (>80% economic occupancy). We are exploring whether or not we should sell at ~65% occupancy to leave some "fat on the bone" for the next buyer.
Our intuition (which is not novel by any means), is that in hot markets the premium you'd get for a fully stabilized building does not fully reflect lease up risk. We will be working to quantify this.
So as to not re-invent the wheel - has anyone looked into this in-depth? at what level of occupancy do you model your exit? why?
Interested to hear your thoughts.
Inventore exercitationem reiciendis repudiandae est explicabo voluptatibus. Id et aut tenetur nesciunt.
Quisquam iusto ducimus in sed maxime esse. Aut neque et voluptatem est eum eius non.
Occaecati molestiae et totam eveniet vero maiores. Molestiae harum ratione aliquam dicta. Et placeat nobis voluptas autem vitae hic. Incidunt magni rerum deleniti. Accusamus sint soluta consequatur possimus est. Voluptas laudantium voluptate sint laudantium adipisci dolorem perferendis.
Voluptatem perferendis error necessitatibus non laboriosam voluptate alias. Nesciunt quisquam assumenda commodi aut quibusdam voluptatum. Quidem eveniet eos modi aliquid ipsam at. Et vero aut sed unde.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...