MBB Consultant Answering Questions

Looks like it may have been a while since a post like this was made here. I found WSO super valuable when I was going through recruitment, and thought it'd be nice to contribute after having spent several years at MBB. Some more background: Went to a semi-target (think UVA/UMich/UCB/UCLA), joined the Bay Area/NY office of MBB, and recently left after having spent 3 years there. Worked closely with the recruiting team while there.

I relied heavily on this community as I was going through recruiting, so happy to answer any and all questions. Please don't PM; let others see your question and we can continue the conversation in PMs if it's clear it's something specific to just you that others wouldn't benefit from seeing further conversation around.

EDIT: Heads up will wrap up actively responding to comments on 8/5, once the thread hits 1 week old--may check every so often afterwards. Just a note to posters who may be coming onto this thread after I've stopped actively checking.

 

Thanks for doing this AMA!

  1. What were some of your stats applying into these positions? (GPA, ECs, etc.) Since you worked with recruiting, what were criteria you looked out for when screening applications?
  2. What was your answer to "why consulting"?
  3. What were some of the materials you used and how did you find case buddies to practice with?
  4. Also I was just wondering what are your steps moving forward from MBB?
 
  1. GPA was 3.97, had a couple ECs that I was very very passionate about and was in leadership positions for, and a solid internship the summer prior. FWIW, I joined MBB as an intern. Resume screens are typically actually done by consultants themselves, and they're ultimately looking for someone who signals they have the intellectual horsepower, cultural fit, and mentality to just get stuff done and learn. Typically, that manifests itself in a decent GPA (we didn't hard cutoff at 3.5, but it was very rare to see someone get through the screen with anything lower), and ECs + professional experience that show real impact.

  2. Won't go into too much detail here as it'll be relatively easy to identify who I am from this answer, but the gist of my answer was talking about why I was passionate about making an impact on businesses and felt consulting was a great fit given the variety of projects and skillset you build. I'll say that the answers people give to this vary wildly -- best advice I can give here is to reflect on why you actually want to enter consulting and give your genuine answer.

  3. I used Victor Cheng's stuff to get familiar with what a case even was, what some typical ways were to go through them, and then turned attention to MBA case books to practice going through cases. I networked with people and, after building a bit of a rapport, found a couple who were willing to do several cases with me. Other than that, I did quite a bit of practice just working through cases on my own.

  4. Went into a product role at a startup.

 

LinkedIn will be more helpful than me here--try searching for PMs at FAANG who have MBB as past experience--but more often than not you're not going to see them move directly into PM positions (exception being a PM development program). More commonly, you'll see them join strategy/marketing/ops teams and then, after 2-3 years, make their way over to product. That transition doesn't always mean that the MBB consultant knew they wanted to do product but couldn't get in directly so then did the other role. In many cases, it's likely because they just didn't think about product or didn't think it was for them, but then engaged with the team in whatever role they were in when they joined, and then came to think it's something they'd like to do. But, I think the case remains that it's going to be very, very rare to see someone jump straight into a FAANG position from MBB--at least when you're doing MBB post-undergrad.

 

Do you happen to know anyone who made a lateral move into the BA/A/AC level from a non-consulting background? Specifically people with 1-2 years of experience. How common is it, especially at very popular offices like SF/NYC? What about at the smaller regional offices, like Seattle or Denver?

I ask because I'm planning the same jump a year from now after striking out in OCR last year. I'll be coming from an operations role at a quant hedge fund. Do you have any advice on what the best strategy for this would be?

 

Yes, I do. It's not super common, but typically we would have ~1-3 industry hires--with a mix of them either having previous consulting experience or not. Network with folks who also jumped from industry, not to get an 'in,' but to actually get their perspective on the merits of doing so, understand how they made the jump, etc. Then, come time to make that decision, you'll not only be informed but also likely have these same people offer you their help throughout the process.

 

Honestly, I'm not too sure. I don't think you're going to see wildly varying availability of outcomes due to office. I think your office impacts 2 things that can impact exit opps: 1) The type of work you end up doing--especially at Bain/BCG where staffing is local and regional, respectively, 2) Prestige of office -- this is the one I'm less sure how much others actually value this; I do think it might matter more in a PE-type recruiting situation vs. exiting to a startup.

FWIW, most people wouldn't lump Chicago into the group of major offices. And remember you can always transfer offices too. Transferring into a SF/NY/BOS office is always going to be harder than going from one of those to the other, but that's just a matter of demand those offices have to fill spots.

 

Currently at an MBB in one of the cities you mentioned. Chicago is among the top 3 biggest offices for each of MBB, and it was McKinsey's first/founding office. Without question, it is a major office.

That said, I believe you're right about the work you're ending up doing being very much influenced by your office for Bain/BCG, and less so McKinsey.

 

Hi, thanks for doing this. I'm entering my senior year and currently interning at a financial company with the majority of the internal strategy being MBB. I am not on the strategy team and plan on recruiting full-time for MBB after my current internship. Is it acceptable/would it be weird for me to network with the strategy folk at my firm or would it be looked down upon especially since I will not be returning FT? How would you feel at your start-up if an intern who does not plan on accepting FT wants to chat about your time at MBB?

 

Honestly, nobody is going to be able to answer this for you except yourself. Whether it's weird to network with these folks at your company depends entirely on what your relationship is like with them. If you're someone who has killed it at the company and you have a good relationship with them, or have someone at the company who views you positively and is willing to make an introduction for you to some of these folks, then I don't think it's weird at all.

 

Hello and thank you so much for doing this AMA! I am a junior at a midwest target and based on my GPA and major, I'm thinking I need to network hard to get into the interviews. (also hustling on case/behavioral prep of course)

My question is how would you advise a student to make a real connection during networking. Without any face to face contact (as OCR is all virtual) what are some strategies for trying to make a genuine connection? Thus far, I have been doing short informational interviews, but it seems a little repetitive and shallow. Any tips? Thanks again.

 

This is a great question, and it's so difficult to answer. What you're aiming to do is make a genuine connection with someone, who will then be willing to really work with you throughout the process/put you in touch with other people at the firm/vouch for you. That's obviously easier said than done. I think the best way to do this is 1) Have warm conversations with people -- find people who were in the same clubs as you or have some sort of commonality where there is going to be a willingness to help off the bat, 2) Have genuine conversations with people. Don't follow the format of what the stereotypical information interview looks like. Think about what you genuinely want to learn and ask these questions. Hopefully you'll form a good enough connection with a couple people that then turns into them wanting to help you out.

 
Most Helpful

This question really stuck with me and I kind of mulled it around and have one more follow-up note here, which is to really take a broad lens as to what a 'warm' conversation or what a commonality can look like. It doesn't just have to be a club you were both in. It could literally be that you see the person has some interest shared with you, has similar volunteer experience to you, is from the same hometown as you; when I was going through recruiting, I too often got stuck thinking a warm connection had to come from some commonality that was formal or professional in nature, but that's not right. I think a better way to think about it is the same kind of stuff that would lead you to connect with someone you meet at a party/bar/in any social scene is going to typically be the best type of commonality when reaching out to someone. As far as cold outreach that came my way, I was always quickest to respond to messages that were along the lines of "Hi Doublejump, I'm a Junior at school interested in joining consulting after graduating. I was looking through the LinkedIn profiles of folks in the San Francisco/New York office of MBB and noticed you [are from X city/seem to enjoy Y hobby/spent a Summer in Z country/whatever]. I'm also a huge fan of Y hobby; [insert one sentence about something they've done in that hobby]. If you're up for it, I'd love to chat about your experiences in consulting so far."

Above isn't meant to be a template, just an example of how these kinds of messages tend to read. I absolutely loved getting these messages. It shows the person is real and thoughtful, and the immediate reaction I have is I'd rather have someone like that join the class vs. someone else from their school.

 

Hey, thanks for doing this. Im interning in ib this summer and looking to recruit for FT consulting roles. Is this a common transition? Seems like some of the consulting folks from my school thought finance/ib kids saw them as a "backup" so I'm worried having a finance focused background isn't as good as having some more diverse experiences. Also, if I get a return, would it be a good idea to try to email the recruiters and accelerate the process?

 

Absolutely a normal transition to make. It'll be important to be able to speak to why you want to do consulting--and I'd be sure to make this a point in your cover letter--but it's relatively common to see folks who did IB during the summer and realized it just wasn't for them.

Never hurts to email recruiters to see if they're willing to accelerate the process.

 

How many carrots can fit into a double decker school bus ?

 

Hi - thanks for doing this!

I’m a rising junior at UPenn and wondering how much networking is required from a target school. Granted I’ve had quite a few coffee chats with different people from different firms, along with some follow ups. Some told me to reach out when I apply but we’re very vague. I haven’t made any serious lasting relationships and am worried i won’t get interviews. Wondering your thoughts on this - do I need a referral from Penn and does my networking sound like enough? Obviously it would help a lot but I’m very stressed that there’s more I can be doing that I’m not.

Thanks.

 

I don't think you need to be concerned. So long as you've got a decent GPA and solid professional + EC experience, networking won't be needed. In other words, networking is helpful if there's a glaring part of your application that'll prevent you from having a good chance at getting an interview otherwise, but it's not itself a requisite to getting an interview. At least at my MBB and specifically my school, the majority of candidates were given interviews simply on the merits of how their applications were scored during the resume screen. Networking and the relationships fostered through that really only came up when it was time to discuss the last few spots we had for interviews and the pool of candidates who we believed to be on that borderline of getting an interview or not.

 

Going along with the question from Rezzy here. Is it pretty important to network with the recruiting team specifically? I know Bain puts out exactly which associates are on the team and I think BCG as well.

Additionally, will networking be enough to counteract a 3.54 GPA (non STEM) and solid experiences? (for summer interns) This is coming from a target school, but not as high as UPenn

My low GPA has been weighing on my mind and networking seems like the only thing I can do to counteract it.

 

Thanks for doing this. Here are some of my questions;

1) I see very very few international students at Bain & BCG. Can you share from your experiences why that is the case? BCG also hires very few people even though it is much bigger than Bain-any thoughts?

2) If I don't have a Consulting internship, as an international Asian male, do I even have a shot during FT MBA recruiting in this environment?

 
  1. I unfortunately don't have much insight here. I will say that, during our resume screens, the number of international students we had even applying was a very small portion of the resumes that came in.

  2. I'm unfamiliar with how MBA recruiting works, but I think this will depend heavily on what MBA you're at. My guess is you get more slack the better ranked program you're at.

 

Thank you for doing this!

  1. I was wondering what about your internship experience led you to want to take your full time offer with your firm?

  2. I've heard MBB can be competitive and cutthroat, and that you have to watch your back from your peers. Was this your experience?

  3. Did you ever feel pressured to work slower or create unnecessary work in order to extend the contract/generate more billable hours for the firm?

  4. This may seem like a silly concern, I realized through my internship this summer that I really do not enjoy making slides, but I am really interested in the idea of helping businesses solve their biggest challenges. Should I take my dislike of making slides to mean that I should pursue things outside of consulting?

 
  1. Thought the work was interesting, stimulating, and would allow me to build a good skillset; absolutely loved the people; exit opportunities were great.

  2. This wasn't my experience.

  3. Absolutely not. We didn't (and I am pretty confident no MBB do) bill by the hour. Projects were scoped in advance and there's a monthly charge. Never once felt we tried to extend the contract for the sake of milking more dollars.

  4. I mean, I guess it depends on just how much you dislike slides. There is a LOT of slide making and editing, at all levels of seniority. It's kind of a means to an end as far as communicating insights and generating needed discussion with clients.

 

What made you decide to exit into product at a startup instead of pursuing other alternatives (continuing at your MBB, b-school, industry, private equity)? The sponsorship package offer seems very compelling, so I'm curious how seriously you thought about it.

Do you see yourself ever coming back to your MBB in the future? Currently at one of these firms and thinking about these topics, so would love your perspective!

 

My MBB leaves an offer on the table to return, so it felt like a risk-free time to do something else in that regard. B-school was something that I thought could potentially be in the cards, but I wanted to get some experience at a startup before going--if I did choose to go. Industry just never interested me much--much better lifestyle and that's a big reason why people go that route, and I never really had issues with the lifestyle (save for a few cases). Lastly, on PE, I spent a good amount of time exploring what the day-to-day looked like--and ultimately it just wasn't something I thought I'd enjoy doing (but this is a great route for many people).

I'm not ready to close the door on going back to my MBB in the future, but the longer I'm out the less I think I realistically go back--have really enjoyed building things and seeing people use them. I did truly love the job at my MBB though.

 

Hi Doublejump,

Thanks for your time in creating this thread. I'm currently at Cal, specifically, and I'm looking to apply to full time positions this upcoming fall. I would like your advice regarding office selection - I am not sure where I want to be after graduation, and as an int. student I have no family in the States either. Some cities I'm considering are Seattle, NY, LA and Houston (or SF if I decide that I want to be close to Berkeley haha).

How did you select your office preferences when you applied?

From what others told me (idk how reliable the source is tho) my school isn't a target for any other offices other than SF, so does this mean that I would have to network with folks in other offices in order to be considered for an interview?

Are some offices necessarily short of the "supply" vs "demand" for candidates? I understand that the standard is the same across all offices in the U.S. but def there would be some that are more competitive than others due to the headcount availability and higher demand. What are your insights into this? Which offices are the biggest in the U.S.?

 

What should be my networking strategy if I want to apply to offices without alumni from my school? My school is a target for mbb but most people go to regional offices and there aren't really any at the offices I'm interested in. Thanks!

 

Same thoughts I gave to the poster who mentioned "I am a junior at a midwest target..." apply here. Seek people who you have some sort of commonality with--in this case it won't be your school--and try to form some connections with them. Alternatively, you could reach out to alumni from your school and, if you can form a solid connection or already are close to some of them, can ask them to put you in touch with people from the offices you're interested in.

 

If this is a serious post, I haven't ever heard of a move like this happening. Typically a move at that point places you entering as a Partner. I haven't ever seen a Consulting Partner come in who wasn't a partner at another firm, and have seen a few folks come in from industry as expert Partners--but these are typically folks with deep industry (vs. trading) experience. And all Partner-level hires will typically have a deep network or at least a couple strong relationships with senior folks at the MBB. I'm no expert on this--just speaking from the handful of these laterals I've seen happen (have seen 3 Partner laterals, 1 Expert Partner lateral).

 

unlike many other professions...a commodity futures trader does not have the networks and deep industry experience...its more like an athlete of sorts...but the sport is solo and can be a very lonely experience. i would expect the entry transition to another field would not be a very senior position...it really would be starting all over (and while i'm sure the experience as a trader has some value as an information processing decision maker...that alone is not enough)...tho perhaps the advancement would be faster than a fresh college hire.

thoughts?

 

How did you select your office preferences when you applied?

From what others told me (idk how reliable the source is tho) my school isn't a target for any other offices other than SF, so does this mean that I would have to network with folks in other offices in order to be considered for an interview?

Are some offices necessarily short of the "supply" vs "demand" for candidates? I understand that the standard is the same across all offices in the U.S. but def there would be some that are more competitive than others due to the headcount availability and higher demand. What are your insights into this? Which offices are the biggest in the U.S.?

 

I believe you'll likely do your first-rounds either on-campus or on-site at your local office before being considered for a separate office (e.g. first round at McKinsey SF before being considered for McKinsey NY). That being said, those other 'popular' offices tend to fill their ranks with students from local universities and/or Top 10 (Ivy League, Stanford, etc.) because they can, so the bar to get there from a non-target is sometimes higher.

 

While I certainly have to appreciate your ambition--and know, especially at Cal, how easy it can feel abnormal to not know what you want to do from day 1--best advice I can give is to actually focus on learning what you're interested in (and do take school seriously + recognize the value of having a good GPA) and pursuing activities you're passionate about. That'll lead into having all the stuff consulting firms look for. You don't need to be in a business frat, consulting club, etc. What actually stuck out most in interviews were the candidates who clearly did stuff they actually cared about and had massive impact; every student from the top consulting club is going to apply to the various consulting firms, and it becomes very repetitive seeing the following profile: 3.5+ GPA, Haas undergrad, Member of or leadership position in top consulting club, Member of or leadership position in business frat, strategy/operations internships at recognizable names. Is that going to get you an interview? Sure. But, there's so many other ways to get an interview and, arguably, are ones that help you stand out not only during the resume screen but also during the interview itself.

Answers to your other questions (keep in mind I didn't state where I went, so take that with a grain of salt): I was an Econ and Poli Sci double major, Haas undergrad vs. any other undergrad didn't matter by the time someone was recruiting for consulting (many other indicators like GPA, impact you've had outside school, etc. were what we looked at), and I don't think double majoring or minoring matters much.

Seriously just pursue stuff you are actually interested in--forcing yourself to fit a mold you think consulting firms are going after is not the path to success, and is not going to lead to you being happy. Do be cognizant of what it is firms and other jobs look for--academic rigor + success, impact outside of school, etc.--but just do what you think matters and is interesting. Even if you were to talk to someone who just joined MBB after undergrad right now, chances are incredibly high they won't even work there anymore by the time you recruit.

 

Recently graduated Cal and I agree with doublejump 100% - sometimes doing what's not cookie cutter will actually make you stand out more (except with maybe McKinsey). Do enough to get yourself through the door but don't be constrained by what is typical. There is so much to do in college that will not relate in the slightest to you getting a job in consulting. Only do those things if you find other genuine reasons to do them (community, passion for business, etc.) so you don't walk away from college regretting all the things you hadn't done. :)

With that being said, feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions about Cal, whether consulting is actually right for you, or otherwise.

 

Does giving a generic "why consulting or why X firm" answer put you at a severe disadvantage? I know there are a few pretty common answers to why consulting so I can see how that is pretty plain.

Does it really matter?

 

Ex in ut et occaecati. Amet amet expedita sed et occaecati velit dicta. Ut labore aliquam est nihil illo labore.

 

Doloremque et quibusdam quia in. Quo enim neque et cupiditate.

Dolores eos ullam dolor enim laudantium dolorum laborum. Placeat qui nostrum est non laudantium totam. Voluptatem ut aut quis molestias veritatis voluptatem et. Perferendis tenetur quia nihil consectetur praesentium rerum.

Rerum praesentium doloremque omnis quidem voluptatem vel. Possimus eum molestiae possimus commodi voluptates quos. Alias omnis labore debitis.

Id veritatis facere alias corporis sed. Quae ipsum qui veniam fugiat rerum quia consequuntur. Ad enim quia voluptates ut eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (99) $225
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • Senior Consultant (331) $130
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Consultant (587) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (538) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (146) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (344) $103
  • Associate Consultant (166) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1048) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (188) $84
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (549) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”